Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 37, Issue 5, pp 335–343 | Cite as

Missing the Boat with Technology Usage in Early Childhood Settings: A 21st Century View of Developmentally Appropriate Practice

  • Howard P. Parette
  • Amanda C. Quesenberry
  • Craig Blum
Article

Abstract

Technology use permeates virtually all aspects of twenty-first century society, though its integration in early childhood settings and recognition as a developmentally appropriate practice remains problematic. A position is taken that education professionals may be ‘missing the boat’ by not embracing technology usage as a developmentally appropriate practice. Concerns are presented that both preservice education and inservice professional development require substantial improvement if early childhood education professionals are to both recognize the role of technology in developmentally appropriate practice and develop skills in using it in classroom settings.

Keywords

Technology Developmentally appropriate practice Preservice education Professional development 

References

  1. Crick Software Ltd. (2007). Clicker in your classroom. From http://www.cricksoft.com/us/ideas/using_clicker/. Retrieved October 30 2007.
  2. Anderson, R. S., Grant, M. M., & Speck, B. W. (2008). Technology to teach literacy. A resource for K-8 teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bakken, J. P., & Parette, P. (2006). Using technology to advance multicultural special education. In F. E. Obiakor (Ed.), Multicultural special education (pp. 272–289). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Banks, J. A. (1997a). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In J. A. Banks & C. A. McGee Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 3–31). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Banks, J. A. (1997b). Teaching strategies for ethnic studies (6th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  6. Bausch, M. E., & Hasselbring, T. S. (2004). Assistive technology: Are the necessary skills and knowledge being developed at the preservice and inservice levels? Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 190–201.Google Scholar
  7. Blum, C., Parette, H. P., & Watts, E. H. (2009). Engaging young children in an emergent literacy curriculum using of Microsoft© PowerPoint: Development, considerations, and opportunities. In A. M. Vilas, A. S. Martin, J. M. González, & J. A. González (Eds.), Research, reflections and innovations in integrating ICT in education (Vol. 1, pp. 41–45). Badajoz, Spain: Formatex.Google Scholar
  8. Blum, C., & Watts, E. H. (2008). Ready-to-go curriculum. Normal, IL: Illinois State University.Google Scholar
  9. Casey, J. M. (2000). Early literacy. The empowerment of technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, J., & Price, V. (2006). Narrowing the digital divide: Head Start teachers develop proficiency in computer technology. Education and Urban Society, 38, 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook, R. E., Klein, M. D., & Tessier, A. (2008). Adapting early childhood curricula for children with special needs (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, T., Fuller, M., Jackson, S., Pittman, J., & Sweet, J. (2007). A national consideration of digital equity. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.Google Scholar
  13. Dever, M. T., & Falconer, R. C. (2008). Foundations and change in early childhood education. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Dickinson, D. K., & Neuman, S. B. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 1). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  15. Downes, T. (2002). Children’s and families’ use of computers in Australian homes. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(2), 182–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feldman, B. J. (2008). What Myspace is doing to protect others from hoaxes. From http://www.surfnetkids.com/safety/what_myspace_is_doing_to_protect_others_from_hoaxes-29973.htm. Retrieved June 3 2009.
  17. Finnegan, C., & Austin, N. J. (2002). Developmentally appropriate technology for young children. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2002, 87–102.Google Scholar
  18. Floyd, K. K., Canter, L. L. S., Jeffs, T., & Judge, S. A. (2008). Assistive technology and emergent literacy for preschoolers: A literature review. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 5, 92–102.Google Scholar
  19. Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school––Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Grahame, K. (1908). The wind in the willows. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  21. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59, 45–51.Google Scholar
  22. Huffman, M. (2008). MySpace agrees to toughen security for young users. From http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2008/01/myspace_states.html. Retrieved June 3 2009.
  23. Hutinger, P., Bell, C., Daytner, G., & Johanson, J. (2006). Establishing and maintaining an early childhood emergent literacy technology curriculum. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(4), 39–54.Google Scholar
  24. International ICT Literacy Panel. (2002). Digital transformation: A framework for ICT literacy. From http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/Information_and_Communication_Technology_Literacy/ictreport.pdf. Retrieved March 3 2006.
  25. International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). The ISTE national education technology standards (NETS-S) and performance indicators for students. From http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForStudents/2007Standards/NETS_for_Students_2007_Standards.pdf. Retrieved June 24 2009.
  26. International Society for Technology in Education, Partnership of 21st Century Skills, & State Educational Technology Directors Association. (2009). Maximizing the impact. The pivotal role of technology in a 21st century education system. From http://www.setda.org/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=191&name=P21Book_complete.pdf. Retrieved July 23 2009.
  27. Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. From http://www.digitallearning.macfound.org/atf/cf/%7B7E45C7E0-A3E0-4B89-AC9C-E807E1B0AE4E%7D/JENKINS_WHITE_PAPER.PDF. Retrieved July 23 2009.
  28. Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology literacy and learning: A multimodal approach. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Judge, S. (2006). Constructing and assistive technology toolkit for young children: Views from the field. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(4), 17–24.Google Scholar
  30. Kalyanpur, M., & Harry, B. (1999). Culture in special education Building reciprocal family-professional relationships. Baltimore: Brookes.Google Scholar
  31. Katz, L. G., & McClellan, D. E. (1997). Fostering children’s social competence: The teacher’s role. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  32. Kirkorian, H. L., Wartella, E. A., & Anderson, D. R. (2008). Media and young children’s learning. The Future of Children, 18(1), 39-61. Retrieved June 3, 2009, from http://www.futureofchildren.org/usr_doc/18_03_Kirkorian.pdf.
  33. Laffey, J. (2004). Appropriation, mastery and resistance to technology in early childhood preservice teacher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36, 361–382.Google Scholar
  34. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New technologies in early childhood research: A review of research. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(1), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loveless, A., & Dore, B. (Eds.). (2002). ICT in the primary school. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mayer-Johnson. (2008). Boardmaker® with speaking dynamically Pro® [computer software]. Solana beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson. From http://www.mayer-johnson.com/ProdDesc.aspx?SKU=M145w. Retrieved July 23 2009.
  37. McGee, L. M., & Richgels, D. J. (2006). Can technology support emergent reading and writing? Directions for the future. In M. C. McKenna, L. D. Labbo, R. D. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 369–377). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  38. Meadan, H., Stoner, J. B., & Parette, H. P. (2008). Sight word recognition among young children at-risk: Picture-supported vs. word-only. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 5, 45–58.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, E., & Almon, J. (2009). Crises in the kindergarten. Why children need to play in school. College Park, MD: Alliance for Childhood. From http://www.allianceforchildhood.org/sites/allianceforchildhood.org/files/file/kindergarten_report.pdf. Retrieved July 23 2009.
  40. National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1995). Many languages, many cultures: Respecting and responding to diversity. From http://208.118.177.216/about/positions/pdf/diversity.pdf. Retrieved June 24 2009.
  41. National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1996). Technology and young children-Ages 3 through 8. A position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children. Washington, DC. From http://www.naeyc.org/about/positions/pdf/PSTECH98.pdf. Retrieved June 3 2009.
  42. National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. A position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children. Washington, DC: Author. From http://www.naeyc.org/about/positions/pdf/PSDAP.pdf. Retrieved February 25 2009.
  43. National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2002). Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings. From http://208.118.177.216/about/positions/pdf/psmath.pdf. Retrieved June 24 2009.
  44. New, R. S. (2001). Early literacy and developmentally appropriate practice. In S. B. Newman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 245–262). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  45. No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301 et seq. (2001).Google Scholar
  46. North Carolina Newspapers in Education. (2009). Making the grade. Understanding digital literacy. From http://www.dpi.state.nc.us/docs/parents/resources/makingthegrade/2009winter.pdf. Retrieved July 23 2009.
  47. Parette, H. P., Blum, C., Boeckmann, N. M., & Watts, E. H. (2009a). Teaching word recognition to young children using Microsoft® PowerPoint coupled with direct instruction. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 393–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parette, H. P., Hourcade, J. J., Boeckmann, N. M., & Blum, C. (2008a). Using Microsoft® PowerPoint to support emergent literacy skill development for young children at-risk or who have disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(3), 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parette, H. P., Hourcade, J. J., Dinelli, J. M., & Boeckmann, N. M. (2009b). Using Clicker 5 to enhance emergent literacy in young learners. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Parette, H. P., Huer, M. B., & Peterson-Karlan, G. R. (2008b). Working with persons with developmental disabilities across cultures. In H. P. Parette & G. R. Peterson-Karlan (Eds.), Research-based practices in developmental disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 143–167). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  51. Parette, H. P., & Stoner, J. B. (2008). Benefits of assistive technology user groups for early childhood education professionals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35, 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Parette, H. P., Stoner, J. B., & Watts, E. H. (2009c). Assistive technology user group perspectives of early childhood professionals. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 44, 257–270.Google Scholar
  53. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2002). Learning for the 21st century. From http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/images/stories/otherdocs/p21up_Report.pdf. Retrieved June 24 2009.
  54. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). 21st century standards. Partnership for 21st century skills epaper. From http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/21st_century_skills_standards.pdf. Retrieved May 18 2009.
  55. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). Maximizing the impact. The pivotal role of technology in a 21st century education system. From http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/p21setdaistepaper.pdf. Retrieved May 18 2009.
  56. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). Framework for 21st century learning. From http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/index.php?Itemid=120&id=254&option=com_content&task=view. Retrieved July 23 2009.
  57. Peterson-Karlan, G. R., & Parette, P. (2005). Millennial students with mild disabilities and emerging assistive technology trends. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(4), 27–38.Google Scholar
  58. Peterson-Karlan, G. R., & Parette, H. P. (2008). Integrating technology into the curriculum. In H. P. Parette & G. R. Peterson-Karlan (Eds.), Research-based practices in developmental disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 183–214). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  59. Pheelan, P., Davidson, A. L., & Cao, H. T. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 224–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2009). The technologisation of childhood? Young children and technology in the home. Children and Society. Google Scholar
  61. Puckett, M. B., & Black, J. K. (2005). The young child. Development from prebirth through age eight (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  62. Rosen, D., Haugland, S. & Jaruszewicz, C. (2007). Developmentally appropriate practice and technology literacy of young learners. In: R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology and teacher education international conference 2007. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (pp. 2754–2757).Google Scholar
  63. Rosen, D. B., & Jaruszewicz, C. (2009). Developmentally appropriate technology use and early childhood teacher education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 30, 162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rossman, G., Corbett, D., & Firestone, W. (1988). Change and effectiveness in schools: A cultural perspective. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.Google Scholar
  65. Silver-Pacuilla, H. (2006). Moving toward solutions: Assistive and learning technology for all students. Washington, DC: National Center for Technology Innovation.Google Scholar
  66. Siraj-Blatchford, J., & Whitebread, D. (2003). Supporting ICT in the early years. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Sleeter, C. E., & Grant, C. A. (2003). Making choices for multicultural education. Five approaches to race, class, and gender (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  68. Stephen, C., & Plowman, L. (2003). Information and communication technologies in pre-school settings: A review of the literature. International Journal of Early Years Education, 11, 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stone, B. (2008). Facebook agrees to protect young customers. From http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/08/facebook-agrees-to-protect-young-customers/. Retrieved June 3 2009.
  70. Tapscott, D. (1998). The rise of the Net generation: Growing up digital. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  71. Thomas, G., & Loxley, A. (2001). Deconstructing special education and constructing inclusion. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wardle, F. (2008). The role of technology in early childhood programs. From http://www.earlychildhoodnews.com/earlychildhood/article_view.aspx?ArticleID=302. Retrieved September 25 2009.
  73. Weinberger, N., Anderson, T., & Schumacher, P. (2009). Young children’s access and use of computers in family child care and child care centers. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Welch, M. (1989). A cultural perspective and the second wave of educational reform. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 537–540, 560.Google Scholar
  75. Wilcox, M. J., Dugan, L. M., Campbell, P. H., & Guimond, A. (2006a). Recommended practices and parent perspectives regarding AT use in early intervention. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(4), 7–16.Google Scholar
  76. Wilcox, M. J., Guimond, A., Campbell, P. H., & Moore, H. W. (2006b). Provider perspectives on the use of assistive technology for infants and toddlers with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(1), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wojcik, B. W., Peterson-Karlan, G. R., Watts, E. H., & Parette, P. (2004). Assistive technology outcomes in a teacher education curriculum. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 1, 21–32.Google Scholar
  78. Zammit, K., & Downes, T. (2002). New learning environments and the multiliterate individual: A framework for educators. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25(2), 24–36.Google Scholar
  79. Zevenbergen, R. (2007). Digital natives come to preschool: Implications for early childhood practice. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard P. Parette
    • 1
  • Amanda C. Quesenberry
    • 2
  • Craig Blum
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Special EducationIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA
  2. 2.Department of Curriculum and InstructionIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA
  3. 3.Department of Special EducationIllinois State UniversityNormalUSA

Personalised recommendations