Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 36, Issue 6, pp 527–539 | Cite as

Artistic Learning in Relation to Young Children’s Chorotopos: An In-Depth Approach to Early Childhood Visual Culture Education

  • Eli Trimis
  • Andri SavvaEmail author


The paper reports on a study of young children and the nature of their art learning based on the in-depth approach and in the context of chorotopos (space-place, area, landscape, region, village or town). The sample includes 50 children drawn from three classrooms in three early childhood settings in the area of Thessaloniki and Chalkidiki, Greece. Classroom observation notes, audio-taped analysis, photographic material and the artworks of children were used to find out the influences of the programs to young children’s art learning. Findings indicate that artistic activities in relation to their chorotopos and in-depth exploration of materials made children more situated to their own environment and enabled them to understand the potential expressiveness of materials and their inherent meaning. Teachers’ role was decisive in providing special “scaffolding” to further the exploratory process in an interactive environment of learning. The findings highlight the significance of learning in, through and about art by allowing children to experience their personal environment through objects and materials encountered in their chorotopos, to appreciate its richness and to see themselves as part of it.


Artistic activities In-depth approach Chorotopos (space-place) Art education Art curriculum 



We express our special thanks to the teachers (Andriana Vretou, Ioanna Goula, Silvia Gramaticopoulou, Thothora Soulimena, Georgia Papaefstathiou, Triantafilia Paximatha, Manousia Aggelidou) who readily participated in the present study, and the children who offered us an enormous amount of images and icons full of joy and knowledge.


  1. Althouse, R., Johnson, M.H., and Mitchell, S.T. (2003). The colors of learning: Integrating the visual arts into the early childhood curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press; Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, T., & Milbrandt, M. K. (2005). Art for life: Authentic instruction in art. New York: Mc Graw Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Brownell, C., & Carriger, M. (1991). Collaborations among toddler peers: Individual contributions to social contexts. In L. Rensick, J. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 365–383). Washington, DC: American Psychologiacal Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter, B. S. (2004). Learning environments for show and tell (an editorial). Art Education, 57, 4–5.Google Scholar
  5. Duncum, P. (2002). Visual culture art education: Why, what and how. International Journal of Art and Deign Education, 21, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliot, S., & Bartley, S. (1998). Material arts design: An exploration in creativity: Ecology and culture. Art Education, 51, 51–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Epstein, Α. S., & Trimis, E. (2002). Supporting young artists. The development of the visual arts in young children. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. Fasoli, L. (2003). Reading photographs of young children: Looking practices. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4, 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture. Curriculum, aesthetics and the social life of art. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gardner, H., & Perkins, D. (1989). Art, mind and education. Research from project zero. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gergen, K. J. (1995). Social construction and the educational process. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 19–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Hohmann, M., & Weikart, D. P. (2002). Educating young children: Active leaning practices for preschool and child care programs. Ypsilanti MI: High Scope Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kellman, J. (1998). Art, narrative & place. Art Education, 51, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krug, D. (2003). Teaching art in the context of everyday life. Green Museum Organisation: URL:
  15. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Patton, M. K. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. London: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  17. Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad and the ugly: The many facets of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24, 5–12.Google Scholar
  18. Piscitelli, B., & Anderson, D. (2000). Young children’s learning in museum settings. Visitor Studies Today, 3, 1–20.Google Scholar
  19. Savva, A., & Trimis, E. (2005). Young children’s responses to contemporary exhibits: The role of artistic experiences. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 6, 13.Google Scholar
  20. Savva, A., Trimis, E., & Zachariou, A. (2004). Exploring the links between visual arts and environmental education: Experiences of teachers participating in an in-service training programme. International Journal of Art and Design, 23, 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Stephens, K. (1999). Primed for learning: The young child’s mind. Child Care Information Exchange, 3, 44–48.Google Scholar
  23. Thompson, Ch. M. (2005). Images of the child in art and art teacher education. Art Education, 58, 18–24.Google Scholar
  24. Trimis, E. (1996). A developmental art program for pre-school education based on the principles of holistic an in-depth approach method. O.M.E.P (In Greek). Researching the Child’s World, 2, 137–151. in Greek.Google Scholar
  25. Trimis, E. (1997a). A developmental Program with Art Activities in pre-school setting. In depth explorations of materials and ideas and active learning approaches. Proceedings of European Regional Conference (OMEP): Art open the child’s sold (pp. 112–117). Prague: OMEP.Google Scholar
  26. Trimis, E. (1997b). Supporting young artists: Exploring and creating with paper (Video). Ypsilanti, MI: High Scope Press.Google Scholar
  27. Trimis, E. (2004). Cultural and aesthetic education: A curriculum programme for lifelong learning. IDEKE, Institute of Continues Adult Education: Greek Ministry Education and Religion.Google Scholar
  28. Trimis, E. (2005). Art and Environment: An in depth visual arts approach with young children. In A. Giorgopoulos, (Ed.), Environmental education: The emergent of a new civilization. Athens: Tipothito-Dardanos.Google Scholar
  29. Trimis, E., & Manavopoulos, C. (2001). Promoting the creative abilities of young children through a visual art program with found materials. In E. Kourti (Ed.), Research in the pre school educational, instructive methodology (pp. 229–244). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. in Greek.Google Scholar
  30. Trimis, E., & Savva, A. (2004). The in depth studio approach: Incorporating an art museum program into a pre-primary classroom. Art Education, 57, 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trimis, E., & Savva, A. (2005). The in depth studio approach: Redefining the aims of early childhood art/visual culture programmes. In Proceedings of abstracts of the International Conference of Art in Early Childhood (p. 32). London: Roehampton University.Google Scholar
  32. Wright, S. (2003). Ways of knowing the arts. In S. Wright (Ed.), Children, meaning-making and the arts (pp. 1–34). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  33. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.University of CyprusNicosiaCyprus

Personalised recommendations