Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp 543–549 | Cite as

Math Fluency: Accuracy Versus Speed in Preoperational and Concrete Operational First and Second Grade Children

  • Vanessa Ramos-Christian
  • Robert Schleser
  • Mary E. Varn
Article

Abstract

Cognitive abilities as well as math fluency play an important role in mathematical skills. Understanding the relationship between cognitive abilities and mathematical skills is imperative to teaching effective arithmetic skills. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between cognitive ability and math fluency with 38 first and second grade elementary aged children. Results demonstrate that preoperational children lacked the speed of concrete operational children but achieved comparable levels of accuracy when completing arithmetic problems.

Keywords

Child development Arithmetic Math fluency Academic achievement Childhood education 

References

  1. Billington, E. J., & Skinner, C. H. (2002). Getting students to choose to do more work: Evidence of the interspersal procedure. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 105–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Binder, C. (1990). Precision teaching and curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Precision Teaching, 7(2), 33–35.Google Scholar
  3. Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. The Behavioral Analyst, 19, 163–197.Google Scholar
  4. Bisanz, J., & Lefevre, J. (1992). Understanding elementary mathematics. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 113–136). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cates, G. L., & Rhymer, K. N. (2003). Examining the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance: An instructional hierarchy perspective. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
  7. Delazer, M., Domahs, F., Bartha, L., Brenneis, C., Locky, A., Treib, T., & Benke, T. (2003). Learning complex arithmetic-an fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dowker, A. (1998). Individual differences in normal arithmetical development. In C. Donlan (Ed.), The development of mathematical skills (pp. 275–302). Hove, England: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  9. Floyd, R. G., Evans, J. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2003). Relations between measures of cattell-horn-cattell (CHC) cognitive abilities and mathematics achievement across the school-age years. Psychology in Schools, 40, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L. I., & Bransford, J. D. (1988). Developing math automaticity in learning handicapped children: The role of computerized drill and practice. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20, 1–73 .Google Scholar
  12. Hartnedy, S. L., Mozzoni, M. P., & Fahoum, Y. (2005). The effect of fluency training on math and reading skills in neuropsychiatric diagnosis children: A multiple baseline design. Behavioral Interventions. Special Issue: Traumatic Brain Injury, 20, 27–36.Google Scholar
  13. Haughton, E. C. (1980). Practicing practices: Learning by activity. Journal of Precision Teaching, 1, 2–30.Google Scholar
  14. Haughton, E. C. (1972). Aims: Growing and sharing. In J. B. Jordan, & L. S. Robbings (Eds.), Let’s try doing something else kind of things (pp. 20–39). Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar
  15. Ivarie, J. J. (1986). Effects of proficiency rates on later performance of a recall and writing behavior. Remedial & Special Education, 7, 25–30.Google Scholar
  16. Klein, J. S., & Bisanz, J. (2000). Preschoolers doing arithmetic: The concepts are willing but the working memory is weak. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 105–116.Google Scholar
  17. Lindsley, O. R. (1996). Is fluency free-operant response-response chaining? The Behavior Analyst, 19, 211–224.Google Scholar
  18. Lovett, M. W. (1987). A developmental approach to reading disability: Accuracy and speed criteria of normal and deficient reading skill. Child Development, 58, 234–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martini, R. (2004). Metacognitive processes underlying psychomotor performance in children identified as high skilled, average, and having developmental coordination disorder (pp. 1–192). Montreal, Quebec: McGill University.Google Scholar
  20. Mccallum, E. (2006). The taped-problems intervention: Increasing multiplication fact fluency using a low-tech delay intervention. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 67(9-A), 2007, pp. 3300.Google Scholar
  21. Mullis, et al. (2001). Mathematics benchmarking report. TIMSS 1999-Eight grade: Achievement for U.S. states and districts in an international context. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College. Retrieved from http://timss.bc.edu.
  22. National Council Of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  23. National Council Of Teacher of Mathematics. (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  24. Pellegrino, J. W., & Goldman, S. R. (1987). Information processing and elementary mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 23–32, 57.Google Scholar
  25. Pellegrino, J. W., & Goldman, S. R. (1989). Mental chronometry and individual differences in cognitive processes: Common pitfalls and their solutions. Learning and Individual Differences, 1, 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. Poncy, B. C., & Skinner, C. H. (2006). Implementation guidelines: Detect, practice, and repair: The effects of a classwide intervention on elementary students’ math-fact fluency. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 7, 69–72.Google Scholar
  28. Poncy, B. C., Skinner, C. H., & Jaspers, K. E. (2007). Evaluating and comparing interventions designed to enhance math fact accuracy and fluency: Cover, copy, and compare versus taped problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 16(1), 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rivera-Batiz, F. L. (1992). Quantitative literacy and the likelihood of employment among young adults in the United States. Journal of Human Resources, 27, 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rourke, B., & Conway, J. (1997). Disabilities of arithmetic and mathematical Reasoning: Perspectives from neurology and neuropsychology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 34–46.Google Scholar
  31. Siegel, L. S. (1988). Evidence that IQ scores are irrelevant to the definition and analysis of reading disability. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 201–215.Google Scholar
  32. Singer-Dudek, J., & Greer, R. D. (2005). A long-term analysis of the relationship between fluency and the training and maintenance of complex math skills. Psychological Record, 55, 361–376.Google Scholar
  33. Starlin, A. (1972). Sharing a message about curriculum with my teacher friends. In J. B. Jordan, & L. S. Robbins (Eds.), Let’s try doing something else kind of thing (pp. 13–19). Arlington, VA: Council on Exeptional Children.Google Scholar
  34. Sweeney, S. R., Sweeney, W. J., & Malanga, P. (2001). The effects of one minute warm up procedures on addition one minute fluency timings. Journal of Precision Teaching & Celeration, 17, 76–88.Google Scholar
  35. Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 252–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wadsworth, B. J. (1996). Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  37. Widaman, K. F., & Little, T. D. (1992). The development of skill in mental Arithmetic: An individual differences perspective. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 189–253). New York: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vanessa Ramos-Christian
    • 1
  • Robert Schleser
    • 1
  • Mary E. Varn
    • 1
  1. 1.PsychologyIllinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations