Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 33, Issue 6, pp 389–398 | Cite as

Documentation: A Hard to Reach Place

Review

Abstract

Some educators experience difficulty documenting young children’s work in early childhood settings because of a limited understanding of the importance of documentation, what or how to document, and the effective use of documentation; limited resources (time, tools, and assistance); or predetermined curricular guidelines. Some teachers, especially inexperienced early years teachers, have trouble engaging with children and documenting simultaneously, revealing a crucial misunderstanding about the purpose of documenting. Teachers at Reggio Emilia-inspired schools throughout the United States use many forms of documentation to enhance the qualities of children’s experiences in preschool classrooms. This article addresses the dilemmas teachers face in implementing documentation in order to assist them as they move from standards-based teaching and teacher-determined content to a more constructivist approach to teaching. Ideas for using documentation shared by the authors will allow young children to construct their own knowledge and curiosity, making learning more meaningful to them and more visible to others.

Keywords

young children early years teachers preservice teachers constructivism documentation standards-based teaching Reggio Emilia 

References

  1. Barnett S. W., Boocock S. S., (1998). Early Care and Education for Children in Poverty: Promises, Programs, and Long-term Results State University of New York Press AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett S. W., Hustedt J. T., Robin K. B., Schulman K. L., (2004). The State of Preschool: 2004 State Preschool Yearbook. National Institute for Early Education Research. New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  3. Bersani C., Condit N., Frazier B., (2003). Thinking together: Teachers, children, and parents as researchers. Innovations in Early Education: The International Reggio Exchange 10(2): 5–12Google Scholar
  4. Bersani C., Jarjoura D., (2002). Developing a sense of “we” in parent/teacher relationships. In Fu V. R., Stremmel A. J., Hill L. T. (Eds.), Teaching and Learning: Collaborative Exploration of the Reggio Emilia Approach Merrill Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ pp 69–81Google Scholar
  5. Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to Learn: Educating Our Preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Cecil J., Alexander C., (2003). The evolution of learning through observation, interpretation, and documentation. Innovations in Early Education: The International Reggio Exchange 10(3): 9–17Google Scholar
  7. Curtis D., Carter M., (2000). The Art of Awareness: How Observation Can Transform Your Teaching Redleaf Press St. Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  8. DeVries R., Zan B., Hildebrandt C., Edmiaston R., Sales C., (2002). Developing Constructivist Early Childhood Curriculum: Practical Principles and Activities Teacher College Press New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Forman G., (1994). Different media, different languages. In Katz L., Cesarone B. (Eds.), Reflections on the Reggio Emilia Approach ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Education Urbana, IL pp 41–53Google Scholar
  10. Gandini L., Goldhaber J., (2001). Two reflections about documentation. In Gandini L., Edwards C. P. (Eds.), Bambini: The Italian approach to infant/toddler care Teachers College Press New York pp 124–145Google Scholar
  11. Gandini L., Kaminsky J.A., (2004). Reflections on the relationship between documentation and assessment in the American context: An interview with Brenda Fyfe. Innovations in Early Education: The International Reggio Exchange 11(1): 5–17Google Scholar
  12. Goldhaber J., Smith D., (2002). The development of documentation strategies to support teacher reflection, inquiry, and collaboration. In Fu V., Stremmel A., Hill L. (Eds.), Teaching and Learning: Collaborative Exploration of the Reggio Emilia Approach Merrill Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ pp 147–160Google Scholar
  13. Graue, M. E., Kroeger, J., & Brown, C. P. (2003). Enactments of developmental thought in early childhood education. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 5(1). Retrieved January 1, 2006, from http://ecrpuiuc.edu/v5n1/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  14. Helm J. H., Beneke S., Steinheimer K., (1998). Windows on Learning: Documenting Young Children’s Work Teachers College Press New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  15. Kroeger J., Lash M., Barbour N., with Burns R., Mayer-Will M., Royski D., Russo S., Tonelli D. (2004, November). Developing and Refining Teachers’ Models for Working with and for all Families of Young Children. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for the Education of Young Children Annual Conference, Anaheim, CAGoogle Scholar
  16. Moran J., Jarvis J., (2001). Helping young children develop higher order thinking. Young Children56(5): 31–35Google Scholar
  17. New R., (2003). Reggio Emilia: New ways to think about schooling. Educational Leadership. 60(7): 34–38Google Scholar
  18. Rinaldi C., (1998). Projected curriculum constructed through documentation–progettazione: An interview with Lella Gandini. In Edwards C., Gandini L., Forman G. (Eds.), The Hundred Languages of Children: The Reggio Emilia Approach–advanced reflections(2nd ed.,) Ablex Greenwich, CT pp 113–125Google Scholar
  19. Rinaldi, C. (2001). Documentation and Assessment: What is the Relationship? In Project Zero, Making Learning Visible: Children as Individual and Group Learners. Reggio Children: Reggio Emilia, pp 78–93Google Scholar
  20. Rinaldi C., (2004). The relationship between documentation and assessment. Innovations in Early Education: The International Reggio Exchange11(1): 1–4Google Scholar
  21. Seidel, S. (2003). Appendix D: Collaborative assessment conference protocol. In Project Zero, Cambridgeport School, Cambridgeport Children’s Center, Ezra H. Baker School, & John Simpkins School. Making Teaching Visible: Documenting Individual and Group Learning as Professional Development (p. 85). Cambridge, MA: Project ZeroGoogle Scholar
  22. Turner T., Krechevsky M., (2003). Who are the teachers? Who are the learners? Educational Leadership60(7): 40–43Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Teaching, Leadership, and Curriculum StudiesKent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations