Abstract
Little is known about the ecological importance of low-order tidal marsh channels to fishes in the San Francisco Estuary, California. We conducted a passive mark-recapture study to compare residency, site fidelity, and movement patterns of fishes in a small intertidal channel (0.1 km2) in a large tidal marsh reserve (4.25 km2). We coupled continuous, high-frequency data on movements of fish tagged with Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT) tags and abiotic conditions from a PIT-detector and datasonde, respectively. Novel insights were gained by employing TidalTrend, a software program that characterizes tidal time-series data for ecological interpretation. Overall, we found that fishes exhibited different patterns of intertidal habitat use: the resident species, tule perch (Hysterocarpus traski), consistently spent more time per visit, per day, and per season using the intertidal channel, except during the reproductive window in spring; the transient species, Sacramento splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) and striped bass (Morone saxatilis), were more opportunistic and exhibited higher individual variation in movement patterns. Generalized additive mixed models indicated that tide height, rate of change in tide height, tidal inequality, time of day, lunar phase, and water temperature better predicted fish detections than other variables, but their effects varied across species. Based on our findings, we posit that time, through tides, allows habitat partitioning among fish species and individuals with different life-history types. Furthermore, functional connectivity between subtidal and intertidal channels in tidal marshes is a feature of the estuarine mosaic that should be integrated into habitat restoration designs in the San Francisco Estuary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baltz DM, Moyle PB (1982) Life history characteristics of tule perch (Hysterocarpus traski) populations in contrasting environments. Environ Biol Fish 7(3):229–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00002498
Barbour AB, Adams AJ, Yess T, Behringer DC, Wolfe RK (2012) Comparison and cost-benefit analysis of PIT tag antennae resighting and seine-net recapture techniques for survival analysis of an estuarine-dependent fish. Fish Res 121–122:153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.01.013
Bass AL, Giannico GR, Brooks GT (2012) Performance of a full-duplex passive integrated transponder (PIT) antenna system in estuarine channels. Mar Coast Fish 4(1):145–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2012.676384
Beck MW, Heck KL, Able KW, Childers DL, Eggleston DB, Gillanders BM, … Weinstein MP (2001) The identification, conservation, and Management of Estuarine and Marine Nurseries for fish and invertebrates. BioScience 51(8), 633–641. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0633:TICAMO]2.0.CO;2
Becker A, Whitfield AK, Cowley PD, Cole VJ, Taylor MD (2016) Tidal amplitude and fish abundance in the mouth region of a small estuary. J Fish Biol 89(3):1851–1856. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13056
Boesch DF, Turner RE (1984) Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: the role of food and refuge. Estuaries 7(4):460. https://doi.org/10.2307/1351627
Boswell KM, Kimball ME, Rieucau G, Martin JGA, Jacques DA, Correa D, Allen DM (2019) Tidal stage mediates periodic asynchrony between predator and prey nekton in salt marsh creeks. Estuar Coasts 42(5):1342–1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-019-00553-x
Bretsch K, Allen DM (2006) Tidal migrations of nekton in salt marsh intertidal creeks. Estuar Coasts 29(3):474–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02784995
Brown LR (2003) Will tidal wetland restoration enhance populations of native fishes? San Francisco Estuary Watershed Science, 1(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2cp4d8wk
Bürkner P (2017) Brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J Stat Softw 80(1):1–28
Bürkner P (2018) Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. R J 10(1):395–411
Colombano DD, Manfree AD, O’Rear TA, Durand JR, Moyle PB (2020) Estuarine-terrestrial habitat gradients enhance nursery function for resident and transient fishes in the San Francisco estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 637:141–157
Department of Water Resources Atlas: highways, roads, California state boundary, LiDAR, bathymetry. State of California. http://atlas-dwr.opendata.arcgis.com/ (accessed January 2018)
Donovan, J. & Ayers, D. (2019). TidalTrend software technical report, US Geological Survey Dept of Interior
Drolet D, Barbeau MA (2009) Diel and semi-lunar cycles in the swimming activity of the intertidal, benthic amphipod Corophium volutator in the upper bay of Fundy, Canada. J Crustac Biol 29(1):51–56
Drucker E, Jensen J (1996) Pectoral fin locomotion in the striped surfperch. I Kinematic effects of swimming speed and body size. J Exp Biol 199(10):2235–2242
Ellis WL, Bell SS (2008) Tidal influence on a fringing mangrove intertidal fish community as observed by in situ video recording: implications for studies of tidally migrating nekton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 370:207–219. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07567
Enright C, Culberson SD, Burau JR (2013) Broad timescale forcing and geomorphic mediation of tidal marsh flow and temperature dynamics. Estuar Coasts 36(6):1319–1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9639-7
Gabry J, Mahr T, Bürkner P, Modrák M, Barrett M (2018) Bayesplot: plotting for Bayesian models. http://mc-stan.org/bayesplot
Gannon R, Payne NL, Suthers IM, Gray CA, van der Meulen DE, Taylor MD (2015) Fine-scale movements, site fidelity and habitat use of an estuarine dependent sparid. Environ Biol Fish 98(6):1599–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-015-0385-5
Gesch D, Oimoen M, Greenlee S, Nelson C, Steuck M, Tyler D (2002) The National Elevation Dataset. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68(1):5–11
Gibbons WJ, Andrews KM (2004) PIT tagging: simple Technology at its Best. BioScience 54(5):447–454. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0447:PTSTAI]2.0.CO;2
Grant GN, Cowley PD, Bennett RH, Murray TS, Whitfield AK (2017) Space use by Rhabdosargus holubi in a southern African estuary, with emphasis on fish movements and ecosystem connectivity. Afr J Mar Sci 39(2):135–143. https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2017.1327887
Hampel H, Cattrijsse A, Vincx M (2003) Tidal, diel and semi-lunar changes in the faunal assemblage of an intertidal salt marsh creek. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 56(3):795–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00296-2
Herbold B, Baltz DM, Brown L, Grossinger R, Kimmerer W, Lehman P, … Nobriga M (2014) The role of tidal marsh restoration in fish Management in the san Francisco Estuary. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 12(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1147j4nz
Hering DK, Bottom DL, Prentice EF, Jones KK, Fleming IA (2010) Tidal movements and residency of subyearling Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in an Oregon salt marsh channel. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67(3):524–533. https://doi.org/10.1139/F10-003
Hoffman MD, Gelman A (2014) The no-U-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. J Mach Learn Res 15(1):1593–1623
Jeffres CA, Klimley AP, Merz JE, Cech JJ (2006) Movement of Sacramento sucker, Catostomus occidentalis, and hitch, Lavinia exilicauda, during a spring release of water from Camanche dam in the Mokelumne River, California. Environ Biol Fish 75(4):365–373
Kimball ME, Able KW (2012) Tidal migrations of intertidal salt Marsh Creek nekton examined with underwater video. Northeast Nat 19(3):475–486. https://doi.org/10.1656/045.019.0309
Kleypas J, Dean JM (1983) Migration and feeding of the predatory fish, Bairdiella chrysura Lacépède, in an intertidal creek. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 72(3):199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(83)90106-5
Kneib R (1997) The role of tidal marshes in the ecology of estuarine nekton. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review. http://www.vliz.be/en/imis?refid=490
Lazaridis E (2014) Lunar: lunar phase & distance, seasons and other environmental factors (version 0.1-04). Available from http://statistics.lazaridis.eu
Luo L, Apps D, Arcand S, Xu H, Pan M, Hoerling M (2017) Contribution of temperature and precipitation anomalies to the California drought during 2012–2015. Geophys Res Lett 44(7):3184–3192
McElreath R (2018) Statistical rethinking: a Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan. CRC Press
McIvor CC, Odum WE (1988) Food, predation risk, and microhabitat selection in a marsh fish assemblage. Ecology 69(5):1341–1351. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941632
McNatt RA, Bottom DL, Hinton SA (2016) Residency and movement of juvenile Chinook Salmon at multiple spatial scales in a tidal marsh of the Columbia River estuary. Trans Am Fish Soc 145(4):774–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2016.1172509
Milardi M, Lanzoni M, Gavioli A, Fano EA, Castaldelli G (2018) Tides and moon drive fish movements in a brackish lagoon. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 215:207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2018.09.016
Minello TJ, Rozas LP, Baker R (2012) Geographic variability in salt marsh flooding patterns may affect nursery value for fishery species. Estuar Coasts 35(2):501–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-011-9463-x
Moyle PB (2002) Inland Fishes of California: revised and expanded. University of California Press
Moyle PB, Daniels RA, Herbold B, Baltz DM (1986) Patterns in distribution and abundance of a non-coevolved assemblage of estuarine fishes in California. Fish Bull 84:105–117
Moyle PB, Baxter RD, Sommer T, Foin TC, Matern SA (2004) Biology and population dynamics of Sacramento Splittail (Pogonichthys macrolepidotus) in the San Francisco estuary: a review. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 2(2). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/61r48686
Moyle PB, Manfree AD, Fiedler PL (2014) Suisun marsh: ecological history and possible futures. Univ of California Press
Munsch SH, Cordell JR, Toft JD (2016) Fine-scale habitat use and behavior of a nearshore fish community: nursery functions, predation avoidance, and spatiotemporal habitat partitioning. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 557:1–15. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11862
Mussen TD, Cech JJ (2013). The roles of vision and the lateral-line system in Sacramento splittail’s fish-screen avoidance behaviors: evaluating vibrating screens as potential fish deterrents. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 96(8), 971-980.
Næsje TF, Cowley PD, Diserud OH, Childs AR, Kerwath SE, Thorstad EB (2012) Riding the tide: estuarine movements of a sciaenid fish, Argyrosomus japonicus. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 460:221–232. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09780
Nagelkerken I, Sheaves M, Baker R, Connolly RM (2015) The seascape nursery: a novel spatial approach to identify and manage nurseries for coastal marine fauna. Fish Fish 16(2):362–371. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12057
Nichols FH, Cloern JE, Luoma SN, Peterson DH (1986) The modification of an estuary. Science, 231(4738), 567-573.
NOAA (2019) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. US Dept of Commerce. Data accessed from the NOAA NERRS Centralized Data Management Office website: http://www.nerrsdata.org/
O’Rear TA, Moyle PB, Durand JR (2019) Trends in fish and invertebrate populations in Suisun marsh January 2018 – December 2018. California, California Department of Water Resources. https://watershed.ucdavis.edu/library/suisun-marsh-fish-study-trends-fishand-invertebrate-populations-suisun-marsh-january-2017
Palaima A (2012) Ecology, conservation, and restoration of tidal marshes: The San Francisco estuary. University of California Press
Pedersen EJ, Miller DL, Simpson GL, Ross N (2019) Hierarchical generalized additive models in ecology: an introduction with mgcv. PeerJ 7:e6876. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6876
Prentice EP, Sims CW, Park DL (1985) A study to determine the biological feasibility of a new fish tagging system. Report (contract DEA179-83BP11982, project 83-19) to Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon.
R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org/
Rozas LP, McIvor CC, Odum WE (1988) Intertidal rivulets and creekbanks: corridors between tidal creeks and marshes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 47(3):303–307
Rypel AL, Layman CA, Arrington DA (2007) Water depth modifies relative predation risk for a motile fish taxon in Bahamian tidal creeks. Estuar Coasts 30(3):518–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03036517
Sakabe R, Lyle JM (2010) The influence of tidal cycles and freshwater inflow on the distribution and movement of an estuarine resident fish Acanthopagrus butcheri. J Fish Biol 77(3):643–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02703.x
San Francisco Estuary Institute (2012) Bay Area EcoAtlas. Modern baylands. Data accessed from website: http://www.sfei.org/ecoatlas/
Scofield EC (1931) The life history of striped bass. California Department of Fish and Game. Fish Bull 29:26–60
Stan Development Team (2018) RStan: the R interface to Stan. R package version 2.18.2. http://mc-stan.org/
Time and Date (2019) Antioch, California data accessed from the Time and Date website: https://www.timeanddate.com/sun/usa/antioch
US Geological Survey (2004) National Hydrography Dataset. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. Reston, Virginia. Data accessed from website: https://www.usgs.gov/corescience-systems/ngp/national-hydrography/national-hydrography-dataset
Vasey MC, Parker VT, Callaway JC, Herbert ER, Schile LM (2012) Tidal wetland vegetation in the San Francisco Bay-Delta estuary. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 10(2). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/44z5v7xf
Vehtari A, Buerkner P, Gabry J (2018) Leave-one-out cross-validation for non-factorizable models. http://mc-stan.org/loo/articles/loo2-non-factorizable
Viehman HA, Zydlewski GB (2017) Multi-scale temporal patterns in fish presence in a high-velocity tidal channel. PLoS One 12(5):e0176405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176405
Walters RA, Cheng RT, Conomos TJ (1985) Time scales of circulation and mixing processes of San Francisco Bay waters. Hydrobiologia 129(1):13–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048685
Wenner EL, Geist M (2001) The National Estuarine Research Reserves program to monitor and preserve estuarine waters. Coast Manag 29(1):1–17
Whitcraft CR, Grewell BJ, Baye PR (2011) Estuarine vegetation at rush ranch open space preserve, san Franciso Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 9(3). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6j89531r
Wickham H, François R, Henry L, Müller K (2019) dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 0.8.1. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=dplyr
Wiens JA (1989) Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct Ecol 3(4):385–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389612
Wood SN (2003) Thin plate regression splines. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 65(1):95–114
Wood SN (2017) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC
Acknowledgements
Funding for data collection was provided by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Ecosystem Restoration Program [E1183013], the Department of Water Resources [4600011551], and the S.D. Bechtel Jr. Foundation. Funding for J. Donovan and D. Ayers was provided by the Bureau of Reclamation [R15PG00085]. Additional funding for D. Colombano was provided by a Delta Science Fellowship [2271] administered by the Delta Science Program and California Sea Grant. This study adhered to Animal Care and Use standards [18883]. We thank I. Jezorek and C. Smith and anonymous reviewers for helping us improve this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colombano, D.D., Donovan, J.M., Ayers, D.E. et al. Tidal effects on marsh habitat use by three fishes in the San Francisco Estuary. Environ Biol Fish 103, 605–623 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-020-00973-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-020-00973-w