Advertisement

California roach (Hesperoleucus symmetricus) in the Eel River of northwestern California: native or introduced?

  • Andrew P. KinzigerEmail author
  • Rodney J. Nakamoto
  • Andy Aguilar
  • Bret C. Harvey
Article

Abstract

To explore the history of California roach (Hesperoleucus symmetricus) in the Eel River, we compiled mitochondrial DNA data for the putatively introduced Eel River population and comparative collections from throughout the native range. Consistent with an introduction scenario, we found that: 1) one haplotype occurred at high frequency in the Eel River, Russian River and Clear Lake populations, making the Russian River and Clear Lake likely source areas, and 2) the introduced population exhibited reduced haplotype diversity in comparison to populations from the native range. However, we also detected four private haplotypes in the putatively introduced population, despite examining 269 individuals from the likely source areas. Extrapolation of the haplotype richness of the likely source population suggested that even with the large sample size, many haplotypes in the source population remained uncollected. The most parsimonious conclusion of our results is a recent introduction of a small number of California roach to the Eel River of California from a nearby drainage. This result aligns with findings for two other California cyprinids introduced into the Eel River from adjacent drainages, Sacramento pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus grandis) and speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus).

Keywords

Invasion genetics Mitochondrial DNA Genetic diversity Introduced species California roach Hesperoleucus symmetricus 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Jason White, Michael Hellmair, Ryan Whitmore, Shawn Chase, Mike Sugars, Michael O’Heurta, Tom Kisanuki, and Bill Poytress for providing specimens or assisting with the collection of specimens. Procedures used in this paper followed guidelines for the use of fishes in research developed jointly by the American Fisheries Society, American Institute of Fishery Research Biologists, and American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists.

References

  1. Aguilar A, Jones WJ (2009) Nuclear and mitochondrial diversification in two native California minnows: insights into taxonomic identity and regional phylogeography. Mol Phylogenet Evol 51:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson EC (1999) Inferring the ancestral origin of sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka, in the Lake Washington basin: a statistical method in theory and application. M.S. thesis, School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumsteiger J, Moyle PB (2019) A reappraisal of the California roach/hitch (Cypriniformes, Cyprinidae, Hesperoleucus/Lavinia) species complex. Zootaxa 4543:2221–2240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumsteiger J, Moyle PB, Aguilar A, O’Rourke SM, Miller MR (2017) Genomics clarifies taxonomic boundaries in a difficult species complex. PLoS One 12:e0189417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blakeslee AMH, Byers JE, Lesser MP (2008) Solving cryptogenic histories using host and parasite molecular genetics: the resolution of Littorina littorea's north American origin. Mol Ecol 17:3684–3696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown LR, Moyle PB (1997) Invading species in the Eel River, California: successes, failures, and relationships with resident species. Environ Biol Fish 49:271–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlton J (1996) Biological invasions and cryptogenic species. Ecology 77:1653–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CDFG (1959a) South Fork of the Eel River – stream surveys. Written by L. O. Elwell. http://eelriverrecovery.org/library/South_Fork_Survey_CDFW_1959. Accessed Sept 2018
  9. CDFG (1959b) Eel River, Partial Van Arsdale Dam to Scott Dam - Stream Survey. written by John S. Day. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/documents/Default.aspx. Accessed Sept 2018
  10. CDFG (1964) Yager Creek stream survey. Written by J. Gaumer. http://eelriverrecovery.org/library/YagerCreek_Stream_Survey_CDFW_1964. Accessed Sept 2018
  11. CDFG (1972a) Hull’s Creek - stream survey. Written by L. Carufel and D. La Faunce. http://eelriverrecovery.org/library/Carufel_1972_Hulls.pdf. Accessed Sept 2018
  12. CDFG (1972b) Salt Creek - stream survey. Written by L. Carufel and D. La Faunce. http://eelriverrecovery.org/library/Carufel_1972_Salt.pdf. Accessed Sept 2018
  13. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game) (1934) East branch of Eel River and tributaries - stream survey. Written by A. E Burghduff. http://eelriverrecovery.org/library/Stream_Survey_East_Branch_1934_CDFW. Accessed Sept 2018
  14. Chao A, Ma KH, Hsieh TC (2016) iNEXT (iNterpolation and EXTrapolation) online: software for interpolation and extrapolation of species diversity. Program and User’s guide. http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/wordpress/software_download/. Accessed Sept 2018
  15. Chiu CH, Wang YT, Walther BA, Chao A (2014) An improved nonparametric lower bound of species richness via a modified good–Turing frequency formula. Biometrics 70:671–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clement M, Snell Q, Walker P, Posada D, Crandall K (2000) TCS: estimating gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1659Google Scholar
  17. Colwell RK, Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Lin S-Y, Mao CX, Chazdon RL, Longino JT (2012) Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. J Plant Ecol 5:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17:431–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dlugosch K, Anderson SR, Braasch J, Cang FA, Gillette HD (2015) The devil is in the details: genetic variation in introduced populations and its contributions to invasion. Mol Ecol 24:2095–2111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fite KR (1973) Feeding overlap between roach and juvenile steelhead in the Eel River. M.S. thesis, Humboldt State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  22. Follett WI (1968) Letter to Leonard O. Fisk dated 21 March 1968. http://eelriverrecovery.org/library/Academy_of_science_letter_Van_Duzen_1968_CDFW. Accessed Sept 2018
  23. Hänfling B, Carvalho GR, Brandl R (2002) mt-DNA sequences and possible invasion pathways of the Chinese mitten crab. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 238:307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harvey BC, While JL, Nakamoto RJ (2004) An emergent multiple predator effect may enhance biotic resistance in a stream fish assemblage. Ecology 85:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson JR, Thomson RC, Micheletti SJ, Shaffer HB (2011) The origin of tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) populations in California, Oregon, and Nevada: introductions or relicts? Conserv Genet 12:355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelly DW, Muirhead JR, Heath DD, MacIsaac HJ (2006) Contrasting patterns in genetic diversity following multiple invasions of fresh and brackish waters. Mol Ecol 15:3641–3653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kinziger AP, Nakamoto RJ, Anderson EC, Harvey BC (2011) Small founding number and low genetic diversity in an introduced species exhibiting limited invasion success (speckled dace, Rhinichthys osculus). Ecol Evol 1:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kinziger AP, Nakamoto RJ, Harvey BC (2014) Local-scale invasion pathways and small founder numbers in introduced Sacramento pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus grandis). Conserv Genet 15:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leigh JW, Bryant D (2015) PopART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol 6:1110–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindholm AK, Breden F, Alexander HJ, Chan WK, Thakurta SG, Brooks R (2005) Invasion success and genetic diversity of introduced populations of guppies Poecilia reticulata in Australia. Mol Ecol 14:3671–3682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lock J, Kelsey H, Furlong K, Woolace A (2006) Late Neogene and quaternary landscape evolution of the northern California coast ranges: evidence for Mendocino triple junction tectonics. Geol Soc Am Bull 118(9/10):1232–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Hines JE, Knutson MG, Franklin AB (2003) Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology 84:2200–2207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marques ACPB, Franco ACS, Salgueiro F, Garcia-Berthou E, Santos LN (2016) Genetic divergence among invasive and native populations of the yellow peacock cichlid Cichla kelberia. J Fish Biol 89:2595–2606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moyle PB (2002) Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  36. Muirhead JR, Gray DK, Kelly DW, Ellis SM, Heath DD, Macisaac HJ (2008) Identifying the source of species invasions: sampling intensity vs. genetic diversity. Mol Ecol 17:1020–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakamoto RJ, Harvey BC (2003) Spatial, seasonal, and size-dependent variation in the diet of Sacramento pikeminnow in the Eel River, northwestern California. Calif Fish Game 89:30–45Google Scholar
  38. Pereira L, Cunha C, Amorim A (2004) Predicting sampling saturation of mtDNA haplotypes: an application to an enlarged Portuguese database. Int J Legal Med 118:132–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reese CD, Harvey BC (2002) Temperature-dependent competition between juvenile steelhead and Sacramento pikeminnow. Trans Am Fish Soc 131:599–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rezansoff AM, Crispo E, Blair C, Cruz E, Kitano J, Vamosi SM, Rogers SM (2015) Toward the genetic origins of a potentially non-native population of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in Alberta. Conserv Genet 16:859–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roman J, Darling JA (2007) Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:454–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, With KA, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC (2001) The population biology of invasive species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:305–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scott CH, Cashner M, Grossman GD, Wares JP (2009) An awkward introduction: phylogeography of Notropis lutipinnis in its 'native' range and the little Tennessee River. Ecol Freshw Fish 18:538–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Snyder JO (1908) The fishes of the coastal streams of Oregon and northern California. Bull U.S. Bur Fish 27:153–189Google Scholar
  45. Spies IB, Anderson EC, Naish K, Bentzen P (2007) Evidence for the existence of a native population of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) and subsequent introgression with introduced populations in a Pacific northwest watershed. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:1209–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vidal O, Garcia-Berthou E, Tedesco PA, Garcia-Marin JL (2010) Origin and genetic diversity of mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) introduced to Europe. Biol Invasions 12:841–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walsh PS, Metzger DA, Higuchi R (1991) Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10:506–513Google Scholar
  48. White JL, Harvey BC (2001) Effects of an introduced piscivore on benthic fishes in a coastal river. Freshw Biol 46:987–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yonekura R, Kawamura K, Uchii K (2007) A peculiar relationship between genetic diversity and adaptability in invasive exotic species: bluegill sunfish as a model species. Ecol Res 22:911–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Fisheries BiologyHumboldt State UniversityArcataUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Forest ServicePacific Southwest Research StationArcataUSA
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesCalifornia State UniversityLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations