Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 102, Issue 4, pp 541–552 | Cite as

Planktonic larval duration, early growth, and the influence of dietary input on the otolith microstructure of Scolopsis bilineatus (Nemipteridae)

  • A. E. HallEmail author
  • L. Vitale
  • M. J. Kingsford
Article

Abstract

The pelagic larval phase represents a critical period in the early life history of fishes, since larval growth and development can contribute substantially to patterns of survival, dispersal and connectivity. The microstructure of otoliths was examined to investigate events during the early life history of the bridled monocle bream Scolopsis bilineatus (Nemipteridae) on the Great Barrier Reef. We validated a distinct settlement mark, characterized by a rapid transition from wide to narrow increments. The time fish spent in the plankton (Pelagic Larval Duration; PLD) ranged from 17 to 27 days (mean = 21.3 days), which is similar to many other fish families. Three distinct early life history stages occurred: pre-settlers (larvae), newly settled fish, and settled juveniles. Increment width (a proxy for growth) was sequentially narrower with each life history stage; pre-settlers>newly settled>settled juveniles, and growth was reduced as fish approached and underwent settlement to reef habitats. Evidence is provided for a “search phase”, whereby growth was reduced in the three to four days preceding settlement; this pattern may be indicative of changes in the behaviour of larvae immediately prior to settling. Two manipulative experiments investigated the effects of diet ration on otolith increment widths. Reduced food intake resulted in significantly narrower increment widths, with a possible lag effect of at least six days. Experiment results indicated that increment widths can be a reliable proxy of somatic growth, and results from this study overall highlight the utility of otoliths as a tool for investigating the early life history of fishes.

Keywords

Otolith microstructure Pelagic larval duration Settlement mark Early life history Food intake Search-phase 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff at the One Tree Island Research Station for their logistical support, as well as Mark O’Callaghan for his valuable assistance with field and laboratory work.

Funding

Funding was provided to M.J.K from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This research was conducted with approval from the James Cook University Animal Ethics Committee (#A2207). All care was made to ensure that fish experienced minimal distress from collections and experimental procedures. All collections were made with the necessary permits from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, and the Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries.

References

  1. Bay LK, Buechler K, Gagliano M, Caley MJ (2006) Intraspecific variation in the pelagic larval duration of tropical reef fishes. J Fish Biol 68:1206–1214.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01016.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergenius MA, Meekan MG, Robertson RD, MI MC (2002) Larval growth predicts the recruitment success of a coral reef fish. Oecologia 131:521–525.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0918-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergenius MAJ, McCormick MI, Meekan MG, Robertson DR (2005) Environmental influences on larval duration, growth and magnitude of settlement of a coral reef fish. Mar Biol 147:291–300.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-005-1575-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boaden AE, Kingsford MJ (2012) Diel behaviour and trophic ecology of (Nemipteridae). Coral Reefs 31:871–883.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-012-0903-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boaden AE, Kingsford MJ (2013) Distributions and habitat associations of the bridled monocle bream Scolopsis bilineatus (Nemipteridae): a demographic approach. J Fish Biol 83:618–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booth DJ (2002) Distribution changes after settlement in six species of damselfish (Pomacentridae) in one tree island lagoon. Great Barrier Reef Mar Ecol Prog Ser 226:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brothers EB, Mathews CP, Lasker R (1976) Daily growth increments in otoliths from larval and adult fishes. Fish Bull- NOAA 74:1–8Google Scholar
  8. Brothers EB, Williams DM, Sale PF (1983) Length of larval life in twelve families of fishes at one tree lagoon, great barrier reef, Australia. Mar Biol 76:319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunton BJ, Booth DJ (2003) Density- and size-dependent mortality of a settling coral-reef damselfish (Bleeker). Oecologia 137:377–384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1377-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campana SE (1983) Feeding periodicity and the production of daily growth increments in otoliths of steelhead trout (Salmo gairdneri) and starry flounder (Platichthys stellatus). Can J Zool 61(7):1591-1597Google Scholar
  11. Campana SE (1990) How reliable are growth back-calculations based on otoliths? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:2219–2227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doherty P, Kingsford M, Booth D, Carleton J (1996) Habitat selection before settlement by Pomacentrus coelestis. Mar Fresh Res 47:391–399.  https://doi.org/10.1071/mf9960391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gagliano M, McCormick MI, Meekan MG (2007) Survival against the odds: ontogenetic changes in selective pressure mediate growth-mortality trade-offs in a marine fish. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 274:1575–1582.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.0242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green B, Begg G, Carlos G (2009) Tropical fish otoliths: information for assessment, management and ecology. Springer VerlagGoogle Scholar
  15. Grorud-Colvert KA, Sponaugle S (2004) Predation in marine protected areas: preliminary results of the effects on growth and survivorship of newly-settled coral reef fishes. Proceedings of the fifty-fifth annual gulf and Caribbean fisheries institute. Gulf Caribbean Fisheries Inst Gcfi, Ft PierceGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall A, Kingsford M (2016) Predators exacerbate competitive interactions and dominance hierarchies between two coral reef fishes. PLoS One 11:e0151778.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamilton S (2008) Larval history influences post-metamorphic condition in a coral-reef fish. Oecologia 158:449–461.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1153-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ (2002) Competition for shelter space causes density-dependent predation mortality in damselfishes. Ecology 83:2855–2868.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3072021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hovenkamp F (1992) Growth-dependent mortality of larval plaice Pleuronectes platessa in the North Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 82:95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hubbs C, JHS B (1986) Ninth larval fish conference: development of sense organs and behaviour of teleost larvae with special reference to feeding and predator avoidance. Trans Am Fish Soc 115:98–114.  https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1986)115<98:NLFCDO>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kingsford MJ, Milicich MJ (1987) Presettlement phase of Parika scaber (Pisces: Monacanthidae): a temperate reef fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 36:65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kingsford MJ, Smith FJA, Flood MJ (2011) Growth and pelagic larval duration of presettlement and newly settled neon damselfish Pomacentrus coelestis, at multiple spatial scales. Coral Reefs 30:203–214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-010-0692-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kingsford MJ, Finn M, O’Callaghan M, Atema J, Gerlach G (2014) Planktonic larval duration, age and growth of Ostorhinchus doederleini (Pisces: Apogonidae) on the southern great barrier reef. Australia Mar Biol 161:245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kingsford MJ, O'Callaghan MD, Liggins L, Gerlach G (2017) The short-lived neon damsel Pomacentrus coelestis: implications for population dynamics. J Fish Biol 90:2041–2059.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leis JM (1991) The pelagic stage of reef fishes: the larval biology of coral reef fishes. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  26. Leis JM, Carson-Ewart BM (2000) The larvae of indo-Pacific coastal fishes. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  27. Leis JM, McCormick MI (2002) The biology, behaviour, and ecology of the pelagic, larval stage of coral reef fishes. In: Sale PF (ed) Coral reef fishes- dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 171–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lester SE, Ruttenberg BI (2005) The relationship between pelagic larval duration and range size in tropical reef fishes: a synthetic analysis. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272:585–591.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luiz OJ et al (2013) Adult and larval traits as determinants of geographic range size among tropical reef fishes. P Natl Acad Sci 110:16498–16502.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304074110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCormick MI, Hoey AS (2004) Larval growth history determines juvenile growth and survival in a tropical marine fish Oikos 106:225–242.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13131.x Google Scholar
  31. Molony BW, Choat JH (1990) Otolith increment widths and somatic growth-rate - the presence of a time-lag. J Fish Biol 37:541–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Molony BW, Sheaves MJ (1998) Otolith increment widths and lipid contents during starvation and recovery feeding in adult Ambassis vachelli (Richardson). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 221:257–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0981(97)00131-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Munday PL, Leis JM, Lough JM, Paris CB, Kingsford MJ, Berumen ML, Lambrechts J (2009) Climate change and coral reef connectivity. Coral Reefs 28:379–395.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-008-0461-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Paris CB, Atema J, Irisson JO, Kingsford M, Gerlach G, Guigand CM (2013) Reef odor: A wake up call for navigation in reef fish larvae. Plos One 8:8.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072808 Google Scholar
  35. Patterson HM, Kingsford MJ, MT MC (2005) Resolution of the early life history of a reef fish using otolith chemistry. Coral Reefs 24:222–229.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-004-0469-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pitcher CR (1988) Validation of a technique for reconstructing daily patterns in the recruitment of coral-reef damselfish. Coral Reefs 7:105–111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00300969 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sale PF, Ferrell DJ (1988) Early survivorship of juvenile coral-reef fishes. Coral Reefs 7:117–124.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00300971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Searcy SP, Sponaugle S (2000) Variable growth in a coral reef fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 206:213–226.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps206213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shima JS, Findlay AM (2002) Pelagic larval growth rate impacts benthic settlement and survival of a temperate reef fish. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 235:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sih TL, Kingsford MJ (2016) Near-reef elemental signals in the otoliths of settling (Pomacentridae). Coral Reefs 35:303–315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-015-1376-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sponaugle S (2010) Otolith microstructure reveals ecological and oceanographic processes important to ecosystem-based management environ. Biol Fish 89:221–238.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-010-9676-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sponaugle S, Grorud-Covert K (2006) Environmental variability, early life-history traits, and survival of new coral reef fish recruits. Integr Comp Biol 46:623–633.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/ic1014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sponaugle S et al (2002) Predicting self-recruitment in marine populations: biophysical correlates and mechanisms bull. Mar Sci 70:341–375Google Scholar
  44. Sweatman H (1985) The influence of adults of some coral reef fishes on larval recruitment. Ecol Monogr 55:469–485.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2937132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thorrold S, Milicich M (1990) Comparison of larval duration and pre-and post-settlement growth in two species of damselfish, Chromis atripectoralis and Pomacentrus coelestis (Pisces: Pomacentridae), from the great barrier reef. Mar Biol 105:375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Thresher RE (1988) Otolith microstructure and the demography of coral-reef fishes trends. Ecol Evol 3:78–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(88)90023-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Victor BC (1986) Duration of the planktonic larval stage of one hundred species of Pacific and Atlantic wrasses (family Labridae). Mar Biol 90:317–326.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00428555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Victor BG (1991) Settlement strategies and biogeography of reef fishes. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, London, pp 231–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Victor BC, Wellington GM (2000) Endemism and the pelagic larval duration of reef fishes in the eastern. Pacific Ocean Marine Ecology Progress Series 205:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vigliola L, Meekan MG (2002) Size at hatching and planktonic growth determine post-settlement survivorship of a coral reef fish. Oecologia 131:89–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-001-0866-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wellington GM, Robertson DR (2001) Variation in larval life-history traits among reef fishes across the Isthmus of Panama. Mar Biol 138:11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270000449 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wenger AS, Whinney J, Taylor B, Kroon F (2016) The impact of individual and combined abiotic factors on daily otolith growth in a coral reef fish. Sci Rep 6:28875.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Williams DM (1991) Patterns and processes in the distribution of coral reef fishes. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilson D, McCormick M (1997) Spatial and temporal validation of settlement-marks in the otoliths of tropical reef fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 153:259–271.  https://doi.org/10.3354/meps153259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson DT, MI MC (1999) Microstructure of settlement-marks in the otoliths of tropical reef fishes. Mar Biol 134:29–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilson TD, IM MC (1999) Microstructure of settlement-marks in the otoliths of tropical reef fishes. Mar Biol 134:29–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002270050522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson DT, Meekan MG (2002) Growth-related advantages for survival to the point of replenishment in the coral reef fish (Pomacentridae). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 231:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wolanski E, Kingsford MJ (2014) Oceanographic and behavioural assumptions in models of the fate of coral and coral reef fish larvae. J Roy Soc Int 11:20140209.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Science and Engineering and ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef StudiesJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations