Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 101, Issue 9, pp 1357–1367 | Cite as

Identifying key environmental variables of two seahorse species (Hippocampus guttulatus and Hippocampus hippocampus) in the Ria Formosa lagoon, South Portugal

  • Miguel Correia
  • Heather Jane Koldewey
  • José Pedro Andrade
  • Eduardo Esteves
  • Jorge Palma
Article

Abstract

Recent findings reported a significant decrease in abundance of two seahorse species (Hippocampus guttulatus and H. hippocampus) in the Ria Formosa lagoon (South Portugal) and no direct causes have been, so far, clearly identified. This study aimed to describe fluctuations in the local seahorse populations through monthly surveys over a course of a year, in order to identify some of the potential drivers behind the seasonal fluctuations. A total of six sites were chosen based on their habitat characteristics. The highest H. guttulatus abundances were recorded at sites with higher holdfast availability and depth ranging from 3 to 6 m, while H. hippocampus were observed at highest numbers in sites with lower holdfast availability and patchy distribution. In most sites, seahorse density decreased during the summer months (from May to August) and increased from August to December. Holdfast use changed across the surveyed sites, according to the respective habitat characteristics. This study identified environmental variables that influenced the abundance of seahorse population, i.e., holdfast availability, depth and temperature in the Ria Formosa lagoon, underlining the importance of monitoring populations over a course of no less than a year in order to avoid bias due to seasonal fluctuations. Identifying critical habitats will provide valuable information for local authorities in order to implement protective measures towards seahorse conservation.

Keywords

Hippocampus guttulatus Hippocampus hippocampus Syngnathidae Long term survey Population abundance Seasonal changes 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Miguel Correia was supported by a PhD grant (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia - Portugal) (BD/41020/2007). The study was supported by the scientific projects INAQUA (Oceanario de Lisboa, National Geographic Channel) and HIPPOSAFE (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, ref. PTDC/MAR/122616/2010). Thanks are also due to Project Seahorse (http://seahorse.fisheries.ubc.ca/) for providing logistic support for underwater surveys and to all the volunteers that have participated in the data collection.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical compliance

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baum JK, Meeuwig JJ, Vincent ACJ (2003) Bycatch of lined seahorses (Hippocampus erectus) in a Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery. Fish Bull 101:721–731Google Scholar
  2. Bell EM, Lockyear JF, McPherson JM, Marsden AD, Vincent ACJ (2003) First field studies of an endangered south African seahorse. Hippocampus capensis Environ Biol Fishes 67:35–46Google Scholar
  3. Caldwell IR, Vincent ACJ (2012) Revisiting two sympatric European seahorse species: apparent decline in the absence of exploitation. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 22:427–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caldwell IR, Vincent ACJ (2013) A sedentary fish on the move: effects of displacement on long-snouted seahorse (Hippocampus guttulatus Cuvier) movement and habitat use. Environ Biol Fish 96:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Correia, M. (2015). Trends in seahorse abundance in the Ria Formosa, South Portugal: recent scenario and future prospects. p. 128 pp. Faro: Universidade do AlgarveGoogle Scholar
  6. Correia M, Caldwell I, Koldewey H, Andrade JP, Palma J (2015a) Seahorse (Hippocampinae) population fluctuations in the Ria Formosa lagoon, South Portugal. J Fish Biol 87:679–690CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Correia M, Koldewey H, Andrade JP, Palma J (2015b) Effects of artificial holdfast units on seahorse density in the Ria Formosa lagoon, Portugal. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 471:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Correia M, Koldewey H, Andrade JP, Palma J (2016) A novel underwater visual census: seahorse population survey as a case study. Reg Stud Mar Sci 8:454–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunha AH, Santos RP, Gaspar AP, Bairros MF (2005) Seagrass landscape-scale changes in response to disturbance created by the dynamics of barrier-islands: a case study from Ria Formosa (southern Portugal). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 64:636–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunha AH, Assis JF, Serrão EA (2013) Seagrasses in Portugal: a most endangered marine habitat. Aquat Bot 104:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunha AH, Assis JF, Serrão EA (2014) Reprint of “Seagrasses in Portugal: a most endangered marine habitat”. Aquat Bot 115:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curtis JMR, Vincent ACJ (2005) Distribution of sympatric seahorse species along a gradient of habitat complexity in a seagrass-dominated community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 291:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curtis JMR, Vincent ACJ (2006) Life history of an unusual marine fish: survival, growth and movement patterns of Hippocampus guttulatus Cuvier 1829. J Fish Biol 68:707–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curtis JMR, Ribeiro J, Erzini K, Vincent ACJ (2007) A conservation trade-off? Interspecific differences in seahorse responses to experimental changes in fishing effort. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 17:468–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foster SJ, Vincent ACJ (2004) Life history and ecology of seahorses: implications for conservation and management. J Fish Biol 65:1–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freret-Meurer NV, Andreata JV (2008) Field studies of a Brazilian seahorse population, Hippocampus reidi Ginsburg, 1933. Braz Arch Biol Technol 51 (4):543–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gristina M, Cardone F, Carlucci R, Castellano L, Passarelli S, Corriero G (2015) Abundance, distribution and habitat preference of Hippocampus guttulatus and Hippocampus hippocampus in a semi-enclosed Central Mediterranean marine area. Mar Ecol 36:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guimarães MHME, Cunha AH, Nzinga RL, Marques JF (2012) The distribution of seagrass (Zostera noltii) in the Ria Formosa lagoon system and the implications of clam farming on its conservation. J Nat Conserv 20:30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harasti D, Martin-Smith K, Gladstone W (2012) Population dynamics and life history of a geographically restricted seahorse, Hippocampus whitei. J Fish Biol 81:1297–1314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Harasti D, Martin-Smith K, Gladstone W (2014) Does a no-take marine protected area benefit seahorses? PLoS One 9:e105462CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. IUCN (2014). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.2. www.iucnredlist.org
  23. Koldewey HJ, Martin-Smith KM (2010) A global review of seahorse aquaculture. Aquaculture 302:131–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lourie SA, Foster SJ, Cooper EW, Vincent AC (2004) A guide to the identification of seahorses. Project seahorse and TRAFFIC North America. University of British Columbia and World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Martins, J. T., Ferreira, Ó., Ciavola, P. & Dias, J. A. (1996). Monitoring of profile changes at Praia de Faro, Algarve: a tool to predict and solve problems. In Partnership in Coastal Zone Management. (Taussik, J. & Mitchell, J., eds.), pp. 615–622: Samara Publishing Limited, CardiganGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin-Smith KM, Vincent ACJ (2005) Seahorse declines in the Derwent estuary, Tasmania in the absence of fishing pressure. Biol Conserv 123:533–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin-Smith KM, Vincent ACJ (2006) Exploitation and trade of Australian seahorses, pipehorses, sea dragons and pipefishes (family Syngnathidae). Oryx 40:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Masonjones HD, Rose E, McRae LB, Dixson DL (2010) An examination of the population dynamics of syngnathid fishes within Tampa Bay, Florida. USA Current Zoology 56:118–133Google Scholar
  29. Pacheco A, Ferreira Ó, Williams JJ, Garel E, Vila-Concejo A, Dias JA (2010) Hydrodynamics and equilibrium of a multiple-inlet system. Mar Geol 274:32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/
  31. Ribeiro J, Bentes L, Coelho R, Goncalves JMS, Lino PG, Monteiro P, Erzini K (2006) Seasonal, tidal and diurnal changes in fish assemblages in the Ria Formosa lagoon (Portugal). Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 67:461–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosa IL, Oliveira TPR, Castro ALC, de Souza Moraes LE, Xavier JHA, Nottingham MC, Dias TLP, Bruto-Costa LV, Araújo ME, Birolo AB, Mai ACG, Monteiro-Neto C (2007) Population characteristics, space use and habitat associations of the seahorse Hippocampus reidi (Teleostei: Syngnathidae). Neotrop Ichthyol 5(3):405–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swartzman G, Huang C, Kaluzny S (1992) Spatial analysis of Bering sea groundfish survey data using generalized additive models. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49(7):1366–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Teske PR, Lockyear JF, Hecht T, Kaiser H (2015) Does the endangered Knysna seahorse, Hippocampus capensis, have a preference for aquatic vegetation type, cover or height? Afr Zool 42(1):23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vincent ACJ (1994) Operational sex-ratios in seahorses. Behaviour 128:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vincent ACJ (1995) A role for daily greetings in maintaining seahorse pair bonds. Anim Behav 49:258–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vincent, A. C. J. (1996). The international trade in seahorses. In TRAFFIC International, p. 163. Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  38. Wood S (2001) mgcv: GAMs and generalized ridge regression for R. R News 1:20–25Google Scholar
  39. Wood SN (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wood SN, Augustin NH (2002) GAMs with integrated model selection using penalized regression splines and applications to environmental modelling. Ecol Model 157(2-3):157–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Woodall LC, Koldewey HJ, Shaw PW (2011) Serial monogamy in the European long-snouted seahorse Hippocampus guttulatus. Conserv Genet 12:1645–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Woodall LC, Otero-Ferrer F, Correia M, Curtis JMR, Garrick-Maidment N, Shaw PW, Koldewey HJ (2018) A synthesis of European seahorse taxonomy, population structure, and habitat use as a basis for assessment, monitoring and conservation. Mar Biol 165:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CCMAR, Centro de Ciências do MarUniversidade do AlgarveFaroPortugal
  2. 2.Project Seahorse, Zoological Society of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Departamento de Engenharia Alimentar, Instituto Superior de EngenhariaUniversidade do AlgarveFaroPortugal

Personalised recommendations