Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 99, Issue 12, pp 1009–1018 | Cite as

Population-level variation in juvenile brown trout growth from different climatic regions of Norway to an experimental thermal gradient

  • Kim Magnus Bærum
  • Leif Asbjørn Vøllestad
  • Peter Kiffney
  • Alice Rémy
  • Thrond Oddvar Haugen
Article

Abstract

Climate-change scenarios predict increasing temperatures and more precipitation at high latitudes. Ectothermic species are highly affected by these environmental variables and due to few dispersal opportunities many populations will need to adapt to these environmental changes. Understanding if, where, and how such adaptation processes occur is important for our understanding of the possible impacts of a changing climate. Individual growth, a key life-history trait influencing population-level parameters is directly affected by temperature especially in ectotherms. Thermal adaptations that optimize growth are therefore expected in such organisms. However, knowledge about how ectothermic animals modify growth rate in the face of climate change is poor at best for many species especially at the local population level. Here, we present a common-garden experiment exploring variations in growth reaction norms for three populations of Salmo trutta (a temperate freshwater fish) over three discrete temperatures. The populations originated from different climatic regions of Norway that vary in temperature and precipitation. Thermal growth reaction norms varied among populations, however we found no convincing evidence for either local thermal adaptations or countergradient adaptations. Rather, the population variation tended to correlate with a variable indicating east vs west climate region, that is strongly associated with a gradient in precipitation in Norway. This results suggests precipitation levels with corresponding flow regimes to have a stronger selection potential for early juvenile growth compared to temperature in these systems.

Keywords

Climate change Temperature Precipitation Adaptation Fish Salmonids 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are most thankful to Olav Berge, Frode Næstad and Kåre Sandklev at Evenstad fish research facility for invaluable help and input during the experimental set-up.

Cyril Milleret and Sandra Marie Paulsen contributed during the experiment. Thanks to George Pess and three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions to the manuscript. The study was possible through funding from Hedmark University College, Campus Evenstad. The experiment and procedures have been approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Authority (NARA) and registered by the Authority. NARA permission ID: FOTS ID 3705. The experiment have thus been conducted in accordance with the laws and regulations controlling experiments/procedures in live animals in Norway,i.e. the Animal Welfare Act of December 20th 1974, No 73, chapter VI sections 20-22 and the Regulation on Animal Experimentation of January 15th 1996.

References

  1. Angilletta M, Wilson R, Navas C, James R (2003) Tradeoffs and the evolution of thermal reaction norms. Trends Ecol Evol 18:234–240. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00087-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auer SK, Lopez-Sepulcre A, Heatherly T, Kohler TJ, Bassar RD, Thomas SA, Reznick DN (2012) Life histories have a history: effects of past and present conditions on adult somatic growth rates in wild Trinidadian guppies. J Anim Ecol 81:818–826. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01964.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 Journal of Statistical Software 67:1–48:doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01Google Scholar
  4. Budy P et al (2013) Limitation and facilitation of one of the world's most invasive fish: an intercontinental comparison. Ecology 94:356–367. doi: 10.1890/12-0628.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Campos J, Freitas V, Pedrosa C, Guillot R, van der Veer HW (2009) Latitudinal variation in growth of Crangon crangon (L.): does counter-gradient growth compensation occur? J Sea Res 62:229–237. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2009.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlson SM, Olsen EM, Vøllestad LA (2008) Seasonal mortality and the effect of body size: a review and an empirical test using individual data on brown trout. Funct Ecol 22:663–673. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01416.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chavarie L, Dempson JB, Schwarz CJ, Reist JD, Power G, Power M (2010) Latitudinal variation in growth among Arctic charr in eastern North America: evidence for countergradient variation? Hydrobiologia 650:161–177. doi: 10.1007/s10750-009-0043-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conover DO, Present TMC (1990) Countergradient variation in growth rate: compensation for length of the growing season among Atlantic silversides from different latitudes. Oecologia 83:316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidson RS, Letcher BH, Nislow KH (2010) Drivers of growth variation in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): an elasticity analysis approach. J Anim Ecol 79:1113–1121. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01708.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Donelson JM, Munday PL, McCormick MI, Pitcher CR (2012) Rapid transgenerational acclimation of a tropical reef fish to climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2:30–32. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Einum S, Fleming IA (1999) Maternal effects of egg size in brown trout (Salmo trutta): norms of reaction to environmental quality Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 266:2095–2100 doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0893Google Scholar
  13. Elliott JM (1994) Quantitative ecology and the brown trout. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliott JM, Hurley MA, Fryer RJ (1995) A new, improved growth model for brown trout. Salmo trutta Functional Ecol 9:290–298Google Scholar
  15. Evans D, Claiborne J, Currie S (eds) (2013) The physiology of fishes. Fourth Edition edn. CRC Press, CRC Marine Biology SeriesGoogle Scholar
  16. Forseth T, Larsson S, Jensen AJ, Jonsson B, Naslund I, Berglund I (2009) Thermal growth performance of juvenile brown trout, Salmo trutta: no support for thermal adaptation hypotheses. J Fish Biol 74:133–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02119.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Huey RB, Kingsolver JG (1989) Evolution of thermal sensitivity of ectotherm performance. Trends Ecol Evol 4:131–135. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90211-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The physical science basisGoogle Scholar
  19. Jensen AJ, Forseth T, Johnsen BO (2000) Latitudinal variation in growth of young brown trout. Salmo trutta J Animal Ecol 69:1010–1020Google Scholar
  20. Jensen LF, Hansen MM, Pertoldi C, Holdensgaard G, Mensberg K-LD, Loeschcke V (2008) Local adaptation in brown trout early life-history traits: implications for climate change adaptability. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 275:2859–2868. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0870 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonsson B, Jonsson N (2011) Ecology of Atlantic salmon and brown trout. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonsson N, Hansen LP, Jonsson B (1991) Variation in age, size and repeat spawning of adult Atlantic salmon in relation to river discharge. J Anim Ecol 60:937–947. doi: 10.2307/5423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koskinen MT, Haugen TO, Primmer CR (2002) Contemporary fisherian life-history evolution in small salmonid populations. Nature 419:826–830. doi: 10.1038/nature01029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Laugen AT, Laurila A, Räsänen K, Merilä J (2003) Latitudinal countergradient variation in the common frog (Rana temporaria) development rates – evidence for local adaptation. J Evol Biol 16:996–1005. doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00560.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  26. Levinton JS, Monahan RK (1983) The latitudinal compensation hypothesis: Growth data and a model of latitudinal growth differentiation based upon energy budgets. II. Intraspecific comparisons between subspecies of Ophryotrocha puerilis (polychaeta: Dorvilleidae) Biological Bulletin 165:699–707 doi:10.2307/1541472Google Scholar
  27. Lorenzen K, Enberg K (2002) Density-dependent growth as a key mechanism in the regulation of fish populations: evidence from among-population comparisons. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 269:49–54. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1853 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mazerolle MJ (2013) Model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c)Google Scholar
  29. McCullagh P, Nelder J (1989) Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nicieza AG, Metcalfe NB (1997) Growth compensation in juvenile Atlantic salmon: responses to depressed temperature and food availability. Ecology 78:2385–2400. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[2385:gcijas]2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change annual review of ecology. Evol Syst 37:637–669. doi: 10.2307/30033846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42. doi: 10.1038/nature01286 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pauly D (1980) On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters, and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks Journal du Conseil 39:175–192 doi:10.1093/icesjms/39.2.175Google Scholar
  34. R (2011) R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, 2.14.1 edn., ViennaGoogle Scholar
  35. Salinas S, Munch SB (2012) Thermal legacies: transgenerational effects of temperature on growth in a vertebrate. Ecol Lett 15:159–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01721.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sogard SM (1997) Size-Selective Mortality in the Juvenile Stage of Teleost Fishes. A Review Bulletin of Marine Science 60:1129–1157Google Scholar
  38. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  39. Steel EA, Tillotson A, Larsen DA, Fullerton AH, Denton KP, Beckman BR (2012) Beyond the mean: The role of variability in predicting ecological effects of stream temperature on salmon Ecosphere 3:art104 doi: 10.1890/ES12–00255.1
  40. Tukey J (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, USAGoogle Scholar
  41. Walther GR et al (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395. doi: 10.1038/416389a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wootton RJ (1998) Ecology of teleost fishes, 2nd edn. Kuwer academic publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Institute for Nature ResearchLillehammerNorway
  2. 2.Faculty of Applied Ecology and Agricultural Sciences, Campus EvenstadHedmark University CollegeElverumNorway
  3. 3.Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of BioscienceUniversity of OsloBlindernNorway
  4. 4.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries ServiceNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, Fish Ecology Division, Watershed ProgramMukilteoUSA
  5. 5.Department of Ecology and Natural Resource ManagementNorwegian University of Life SciencesAasNorway

Personalised recommendations