Temperature effects induced by climate change on the growth and consumption by salmonines in Lakes Michigan and Huron
- 491 Downloads
We used bioenergetics models to investigate temperature effects induced by climate change on the growth and consumption by Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, lake trout Salvelinus namaycush, and steelhead O. mykiss in Lakes Michigan and Huron. We updated biological inputs to account for recent changes in the food webs and used temperature inputs in response to regional climate observed in the baseline period (1964–1993) and projected in the future period (2043–2070). Bioenergetics simulations were run across multiple age-classes and across all four seasons in different scenarios of prey availability. Due to the increased capacity of prey consumption, future growth and consumption by these salmonines were projected to increase substantially when prey availability was not limited. When prey consumption remained constant, future growth of these salmonines was projected to decrease in most cases but increase in some cases where the increase in metabolic cost can be compensated by the decrease in waste (egestion and excretion) loss. Consumption by these salmonines was projected to increase the most during spring and fall when prey energy densities are relatively high. Such seasonality benefits their future growth through increasing annual gross energy intake. Our results indicated that lake trout and steelhead would be better adapted to the warming climate than Chinook salmon. To maintain baseline growth into the future, an increase of 10 % in baseline prey consumption was required for Chinook salmon but considerably smaller increases, or no increases, in prey consumption were needed by lake trout and steelhead.
KeywordsClimate change Bioenergetics models Salmonines Lake michigan Lake huron
We thank Michael Wiley and James Breck for providing valuable comments on an early draft of manuscript. We also thank Roger Bergstedt, Jixiang He, Gregory Jacobs, Amber Peters, and Jeffery Schaeffer for sharing unpublished data. Simon Hsu and Yo-Jin Shiau provided technical support. This research was funded by the U.S. Geological National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center. This article is Contribution 1864 of the U.S. Geological Survey Great Lakes Science Center.
- Brandt SB, Mason DM, McCormick MJ, Lofgren B, Hunter TS, Tyler JA (2002) Climate change: implications for fish growth performance in the Great Lakes. In: McGinn NA (ed) Fisheries in a Changing Climate. American Fisheries Society Symposium 32, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, pp 61–75Google Scholar
- Brown EH, Busiahn TR, Jones ML, Argyle RL (1999) Allocating Great Lakes forage bases in response to multiple demand. In: Taylor WW, Ferreri CP (eds) Great Lakes fisheries policy and management: a binational perspective. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, pp 355–394Google Scholar
- Crawford SS (2001) Salmonine introductions to the Laurentain Great Lakes: an historical review and evaluation of ecological effects. Can Spec Pub Fish Aquat Sci 132Google Scholar
- Dobiesz NE (2003) An evaluation of the role of top piscivores in the fish community of the main basin of Lake Huron. Michigan State University, Doctoral dissertationGoogle Scholar
- Fenske JL, Shouder MF (1992) Swan River harvest weir report, 1984–90. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Technical Report, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, pp 92–6Google Scholar
- Hanson PC, Johnson TB, Schindler DE, Kitchell JF (1997) Fish Bioenergetics 3.0. University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute Technical Report WISCU-T-97-001, Madison, Wisconsin, USAGoogle Scholar
- Hay RL (1992) Little Manistee River harvest weir and chinook salmon egg-take report, 1990. Michigan Department of Natural Resources , Fisheries Technical Report, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, pp 92–5Google Scholar
- IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kling GW, Hayhoe K, Johnson LB, Magnuson JJ, Polasky S, Robinson SK, Shuter BJ, Wander MM, Wuebbles DJ, Zak DR (2003) Confronting Climate Change in the Great Lakes. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge and Massachusetts and Ecological Society of America, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- NCDC, NOAA National Climate Data Center, (2013) Climate at a Glance. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/. Accessed June 2013.
- Stewart DJ (1980) Salmonid predators and their forage base in Lake Michigan: a bioenergetics-modeling synthesis. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, Doctoral dissertationGoogle Scholar
- Thayer SA, Loftus AJ (2012) Great Lakes recreational fisheries and their role in fisheries management and policy. In: Taylor WW, Lynch AJ, Leonard NJ (eds) Great Lakes fisheries policy and management: a binational perspective, 2nd edn. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, pp 399–440Google Scholar
- Wells L (1968) Seasonal depth distribution of fish in southeastern Lake Michigan. Fish Bull 67:1–15Google Scholar