Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 98, Issue 4, pp 993–1003

Effects of flow regime on growth rate in freshwater drum, Aplodinotus grunniens

  • Stephen J. Jacquemin
  • Jason C. Doll
  • Mark Pyron
  • Michael Allen
  • Dustin A. S. Owen
Article

Abstract

Understanding the influence of flow regime hydrology on fish life history is essential for conservation and management of lotic ecosystems. The objectives of this study were to investigate growth patterns of Wabash River freshwater drum Aplodinotus grunniens relative to age, sex, and long term flow regime variation. Growth was estimated using back-calculated lengths from otolith measurements. Flow regime was described using Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration flow metrics calculated from long-term stream flow data at USGS stations. A generalized linear mixed model was used to model growth as a function of age, sex, and flow regime. Freshwater drum growth was explained by variation in age, sex, and flow magnitude. Freshwater drum exhibited indeterminate growth relative to age. Mean growth rates and mean length at age were lower in males than females. High magnitude flow events were positively correlated with increased growth rates in both males and females. However, the effect of flow magnitude variation on growth was stronger in males. The primary flow regime metrics related to growth were magnitude-based and were not related to timing of flow events. The study provides evidence that long term variation in flow regime is a catalyst for alterations in freshwater drum growth rates.

Keywords

Multivariate statistics Hydrological variation Freshwater fish ecology Freshwater fish assemblage IHA analysis Long term growth 

References

  1. Ali M, Nicieza A, Wootton RJ (2003) Compensatory growth in fishes: a response to growth depression. Fish Fish 4:147–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bain MB, Finn JT, Booke HE (1988) Streamflow regulation and fish community structure. Ecology 69:382–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney RL (1926) The distribution of the freshwater sheepshead, Aplodinotus grunniens Rafinesque, in respect to the glacial history of North America. Ecology 7:351–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker GC (1983) The Fishes of Wisconsin. The University of Wisconsin Press, WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  5. Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Mange 30:492–507Google Scholar
  6. Campana SE (1990) How reliable are growth back-calculations based on otoliths? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:2219–2227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cushman RM (1985) Review of ecological effects of rapidly varying flows downstream from hydroelectric facilities. N Am J Fish Manage 5:330–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devries DR, Frie RV (1996) Determination of age and growth. In: Murphy BR, Willis DW (eds) Fisheries techniques, 2nd edn. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 483–512Google Scholar
  9. Dutterer AC, Mesing C, Cailteux R, Allen MS, Pine WE, Strickland PA (2013) Fish recruitment is influenced by river flows and floodplain inundation at Apalachicola River, Florida. River Res Appl 29:1110–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dynesius M, Nilsson C (1994) Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266:753–762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. French JRP III, Bur MT (1996) The effect of zebra mussel consumption on growth of freshwater drum in Lake Erie. J Fresh Ecol 11:283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gammon JR (1998) The Wabash River Ecosystem. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IndianaGoogle Scholar
  13. Grabowski TB, Young SP, Ely PC, Isely JJ (2012) Age, growth, and reproductive biology of three Catostomids from the Apalachicola River, Florida. J Fish Wildl Manage 3:223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Headley HC, Lauer TE (2008) Density-dependent growth of yellow perch in southern Lake Michigan, 1984–2004. N Am J Fish Manage 28:57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Isely JJ, Grabowski TB (2007) Age and Growth. In: Guy CS, Brown ML (eds) Analysis and Interpretation of Freshwater Fisheries Data. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, pp 187–228Google Scholar
  16. Jacquemin SJ, Pyron M, Allen M, Etchison L (2013) Wabash River freshwater drum Aplodinotus grunniens diet: effects of body size, sex, and river gradient. J Fish Wildl Manage doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3996/032013-JFWM-027
  17. Jackson DA (1993) Stopping rules in principal components analysis a comparison of heuristical and statistical approaches. Ecology 74:2204–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnsson JI, Bohlin T (2005) Compensatory growth for free? A field experiment on brown trout, Salmo trutta. Oikos 111:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones CM (2000) Fitting growth curves to retrospective size-at-age data. Fish Res 46:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koel TM, Sparks RE (2002) Historical patterns of river stage and fish communities as criteria for operations of dams on the Illinois River. Riv Res Appl 18:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Konrad CP, Olden JD, Lytle DA, Melis TS, Schmidt JC, Bray EN, Freeman MC, Gido KB, Hemphill NP, Kennard MJ, McMullen LE, Mims MC, Pyron M, Robinson CT, Williams JG (2011) Large-scale flow experiments for managing river systems. Bioscience 61:948–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lytle D, Poff NL (2004) Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends Ecol Evol 19:94–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of Ecological Communities. MjM Software Design, OregonGoogle Scholar
  24. Mims MC, Olden JD (2012) Life history theory predicts fish assemblage response to hydrologic regimes. Ecology 93:35–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Neuheimer A, Thresher R, Lyle J, Semmens J (2011) Tolerance limit for fish growth exceeded by warming waters. Nature Clim Change 1:110–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nicieza AG, Brana F (1993) Relationship among smolt size, marine growth, and sea age at maturity of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Northern Spain. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:1632–1640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nikki J, Pirhonen J, Jobling M, Karjalainen J (2004) Compensatory growth in juvenile rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), held individually. Aquaculture 235:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nislow KH, Sepulveda AJ, Folt CL (2004) Mechanistic linkage of hydrologic regime to summer growth of age-0 Atlantic salmon. T Am Fish Soc 133:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Page LM, Burr BM (2011) Peterson Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes of North America. Houghton Mifflin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Parker G (1992) The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in fish. J Fish Biol Supp B 41:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pereira DL, Bingham C, Spangler GR, Conner DJ, Cunningham PK (1995) Construction of a 110-year biochronology from sagittae of freshwater drum (Aplodinotus grunniens). In: Secor DH, Dean JM, Campana SE (eds) New Developments in Fish Otolith Research. University of South Carolina Press, South Carolina, pp 177–196Google Scholar
  32. Pflieger WL (1997) The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MissouriGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D. The R Development Core Team. (2012) nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-104Google Scholar
  34. Poff NLR, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47:769–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pringle C, Freeman MC, Freeman BJ (2000) Regional effects of hydrologic alterations on riverine macrobiota in the New World: tropical-temperate comparisons. Bioscience 50:807–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pritchett J, Pyron M (2012) Fish assembalges respond to habitat and hydrology in the Wabash River, Indiana. River Res Appl 28:1501–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pyron M, Lauer TE (2004) Hydrological variation and fish assemblage structure in the middle Wabash River. Hydrobiologia 525:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pyron M, Neumann K (2008) Hydrologic alterations in the Wabash River watershed, USA. River Res Appl 24:1175–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Quist MC, Spiegel JR (2012) Population demographics of Catostomids in large river ecosystems: effects of discharge and temperature on recruitment dynamics and growth. River Res Appl 28:1567–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical; Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available: http://www.R-project.org/
  41. Richard JC, Rypel AL (2013) Water body type influences climate-growth relationships of freshwater drum. T Am Fish Soc 142:1308–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP (1996) A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conserv Biol 10:1163–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ricker WE (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull Fish Res Board Can 191Google Scholar
  44. Rutherford DA, Kelso WE, Frederick Bryan C, Constant GC (1995) Influence of physicochemical characteristics on annual growth increments of four fishes from the Lower Mississippi River. T Am Fish Soc 124:687–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rypel AL, Bayne DR, Mitchell JB (2006) Growth of freshwater drum from lotic and lentic habitats in Alabama. T Am Fish Soc 135:987–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rypel AL (2007) Sexual dimorphism in growth of freshwater drum. Southeast Nat 6:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rypel AL (2011) River impoundment and sunfish growth. River Res Appl 27:580–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saether BS, Jobling M (1999) The effects of ration level on feed intake and growth, and compensatory growth after restricted feeding, in turbot Scophthalmus maximus L. Aquacult Res 30:647–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sparre P, Venema SC (1998) Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1 – Manual. FAO Fish. Technol Paper 306(1):1–337Google Scholar
  50. Taylor CM, Millican DS, Roberts ME, Slack WT (2008) Long-term change to fish assemblages after extensive ecosystem fragmentation by the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway in Mississippi. Ecography 31:787–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Teichert MAK, Kvingedal E, Forseth T, Ugedal O, Finstad AG (2010) Effects of discharge and local density on the growth of juvenile Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. J Fish Biol 76:1751–1769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Thorp JH, Flotermersch JE, DeLong MD, Casper AF, Thoms MC, Ballantyne F, Williams BS, O’Neill BJ, Haase CS (2010) Linking ecosystem services, rehabilitation, and river hydrogeomorphology. Bioscience 60:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tonkin ZD, King AJ, Robertson AI, Ramsey DS (2011) Early fish growth varies in response to components of the flow regime in a temperate floodplain river. Freshwater Biol 56:1769–1782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummin KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE (1980) The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weisberg SB, Burton WH (1993) Enhancement of fish feeding and growth after an increase in minimum flow below the Conowingo Dam. N Am J Fish Manage 13:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. Jacquemin
    • 1
  • Jason C. Doll
    • 2
  • Mark Pyron
    • 2
  • Michael Allen
    • 2
  • Dustin A. S. Owen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesWright State University – Lake CampusCelinaUSA
  2. 2.Aquatic Biology and Fisheries Center, Department of BiologyBall State UniversityMuncieUSA
  3. 3.Center of Excellence for Field Biology, Department of BiologyAustin Peay State UniversityClarksvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations