Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 97, Issue 3, pp 277–283 | Cite as

Presettlement schooling behaviour of a priacanthid, the Purplespotted Bigeye Priacanthus tayenus (Priacanthidae: Teleostei)

  • Julia Santana-Garcon
  • Jeffrey M. Leis
  • Stephen J. Newman
  • Euan S. Harvey
Article

Abstract

We report in situ behavioural observations of presettlement schooling in Priacanthus tayenus off Coral Bay, Western Australia collected using pelagic Baited Remote Underwater stereo-Video systems. Two groups of fish (8 and 9 individuals) were observed that aggregated into a single school. Mean total length was 24.1 mm (12.5–30.2 mm). The fish swam at a mean speed of 8.5 cm s−1 in a group spacing themselves more or less evenly at a distance of around one body length from the nearest neighbour within the school. P. tayenus appeared to be sometimes associated with juveniles of other species. The results presented here add to the limited, but growing body of literature on the schooling behaviour of the early pelagic stages of demersal fishes.

Keywords

Pelagic juvenile reef fish Mid-water baited remote underwater stereo-video Demersal fish Ningaloo Reef Western Australia 

Supplementary material

ESM 1

(MPG 7632 kb)

References

  1. Breitburg DL (1991) Settlement patterns and presettlement behaviour of the naked goby, Gobiosoma bosci, a temperate oyster reef fish. Mar Biol 109(2):213–221. doi:10.1007/bf01319389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caldwell DK (1962) Development and distribution of the short bigeye Pseudopriacanthus altus (Gill) in the western North Atlantic. US Dep Inter Fish Bull 203:1–150Google Scholar
  3. Caldwell DK, Bullis HR (1971) Unusually large aggregation of prejuvenile bigeyes, Priacanthus arenatus, in West Indies. Copeia (1):176Google Scholar
  4. Harvey ES, Shortis M (1995) A system for stereo-video measurement of sub-tidal organisms. Mar Technol Soc J 29(4):10–22Google Scholar
  5. Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis M (2001a) A comparison of the precision and accuracy of estimates of reef-fish lengths determined visually by divers with estimates produced by a stereo-video system. Fish Bull 99(1):63–71Google Scholar
  6. Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis M (2001b) Improving the statistical power of length estimates of reef fish: a comparison of estimates determined visually by divers with estimates produced by a stereo-video system. Fish Bull 99(1):72–80Google Scholar
  7. Harvey E, Fletcher D, Shortis M (2002) Estimation of reef fish length by divers and by stereo-video—a first comparison of the accuracy and precision in the field on living fish under operational conditions. Fish Res 57(3):255–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harvey ES, Fletcher D, Shortis MR, Kendrick GA (2004) A comparison of underwater visual distance estimates made by scuba divers and a stereo-video system: implications for underwater visual census of reef fish abundance. Mar Freshw Res 55(6):573–580. doi:10.1071/mf03130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harvey ES, Goetze J, McLaren B, Langlois T, Shortis MR (2010) Influence of range, angle of view, image resolution and image compression on underwater stereo-video measurements: high-definition and broadcast-resolution video cameras compared. Mar Technol Soc J 44(1):75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harvey ES, Butler JJ, McLean DL, Shand J (2012) Contrasting habitat use of diurnal and nocturnal fish assemblages in temperate Western Australia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 426:78–86. doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2012.05.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heagney EC, Lynch TP, Babcock RC, Suthers IM (2007) Pelagic fish assemblages assessed using mid-water baited video: standardising fish counts using bait plume size. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 350:255–266. doi:10.3354/meps07193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kingsford MJ, Tricklebank KA (1991) Ontogeny and behavior of Aldrichetta forsteri (TELEOSTEI, MUGILIDAE). Copeia 1:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leis JM (2006) Are larvae of demersal fishes plankton or nekton? In: Southward AJ, Sims DW (eds) Advances in marine biology, vol 51. Academic Press Ltd-Elsevier Science Ltd, London, pp 57–141. doi:10.1016/s0065-2881(06)51002-8 Google Scholar
  14. Leis JM (2010) Ontogeny of behaviour in larvae of marine demersal fishes. Ichthyol Res 57(4):325–342. doi:10.1007/s10228-010-0177-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leis JM, Carson-Ewart BM (1998) Complex behaviour by coral-reef fish larvae in open-water and near-reef pelagic environments. Environ Biol Fish 53(3):259–266. doi:10.1023/a:1007424719764 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leis JM, Sweatman HPA, Reader SE (1996) What the pelagic stages of coral reef fishes are doing out in blue water: daytime field observations of larval behavioural capabilities. Mar Freshw Res 47(2):401–411. doi:10.1071/mf9960401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lester RJG, Watson RA (1985) Growth, mortality, parasitism, and potential yields of two Priacanthus species in the South China Sea. J Fish Biol 27(3):307–318. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.1985.tb04032.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masuda R (2009) Behavioral ontogeny of marine pelagic fishes with the implications for the sustainable management of fisheries resources. Aqua-Bio Sci Monogr 2(2):1–56Google Scholar
  19. Masuda R, Shoji J, Nakayama S, Tanaka M (2003) Development of schooling behavior in Spanish mackerel Scomberomorus niphonius during early ontogeny. Fish Sci 69(4):772–776. doi:10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00685.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCormick MI, Milicich MJ (1993) Late pelagic stage goatfishes—distribution patterns and inferences on schooling behavior. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 174(1):15–42. doi:10.1016/0022-0981(93)90249-n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mora C, Sale PF (2002) Are populations of coral reef fish open or closed? Trends Ecol Evol 17(9):422–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ohman MC, Munday PL, Jones GP, Caley MJ (1998) Settlement strategies and distribution patterns of coral-reef fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 225(2):219–238. doi:10.1016/s0022-0981(97)00224-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seah YG, Mazlan AG, Abdullah S, Zaidi CC, Usup G, Mohamed CAR (2011) Feeding guild of dominant trawl speceis in the southeastern waters of Peninsular Malaysia. J Biol Sci 11(2):221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Senta T (1978) High incidence of aggregations of the bigeyes, Priacanthus tayenus and P. macracanthus in the South China Sea. Bull Fac Fish Nagasaki University 45:1–4Google Scholar
  25. Shaw E (1978) Scooling fishes. Am Sci 66(2):166–175Google Scholar
  26. Soria M, Freon P, Chabanet P (2007) Schooling properties of an obligate and a facultative fish species. J Fish Biol 71(5):1257–1269. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01554.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Starnes WC (1988) Revision, phylogeny and biogeographic comments on the cirmtropical marine percoid fish family Priacanthidae. Bull Mar Sci 43(2):117–203Google Scholar
  28. Starnes WC (1999) Priacanthidae. FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific, vol 4. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  29. Torisawa S, Fukuda H, Suzuki K, Takagi T (2011) Schooling behaviour of juvenile Pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis depends on their vision development. J Fish Biol 79(5):1291–1303. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03113.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Santana-Garcon
    • 1
  • Jeffrey M. Leis
    • 2
    • 3
  • Stephen J. Newman
    • 4
  • Euan S. Harvey
    • 1
  1. 1.The School of Plant Biology and UWA Oceans Institute (M470), Faculty of Natural and Agricultural SciencesThe University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of IchthyologyAustralian MuseumSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Institute for Marine and Antarctic StudiesUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  4. 4.Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories, Department of FisheriesGovernment of Western AustraliaNorth BeachAustralia

Personalised recommendations