Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 96, Issue 10–11, pp 1169–1186 | Cite as

Impending extinction of salmon, steelhead, and trout (Salmonidae) in California

  • Jacob KatzEmail author
  • Peter B. Moyle
  • Rebecca M. Quiñones
  • Joshua Israel
  • Sabra Purdy


California contains the southernmost native populations of most Pacific Coast salmon and trout, many of which appear to be rapidly headed toward extinction. A quantitative protocol was developed to determine conservation status of all salmonids native to the state. Results indicate that if present trends continue, 25 (78%) of the 32 taxa native to California will likely be extinct or extirpated within the next century, following the bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), which was extirpated in the 1970s. California’s salmonids are adapted to living in a topographically diverse region with a Mediterranean climate, characterized by extreme seasonal and inter-annual variability in streamflow. Consequently, California salmonids have evolved extraordinary life history diversity to persist in the face of stressful conditions that often approach physiological limits. The spatial distributions of California salmonids vary from wide-ranging anadromous forms to endemic inland forms persisting in only a few kilometers of stream. Eighty-one percent of anadromous taxa are threatened with extinction and 73% inland taxa are either threatened or already extinct. Although specific drivers of decline differ across species, major causes of decline are related to increasing competition with humans for water, human degradation of watersheds, and adverse effects of hatchery propagation. Climate change, interacting with the other causes of decline, is increasing the trajectory towards extinction for most populations. Bringing all of California’s salmonid fishes back from the brink of extinction may not be possible. If there are bold changes to management policy, however, self-sustaining populations of many species may be possible due to their inherent ability to adapt to changing conditions.


Status assessment Aquatic conservation Climate Hatchery Mediterranean 



Initial funding for this project was provided by California Trout, Inc, through the Sage Fund. Funding for this analysis was provided by the California Department of Fish and Game and by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the Stephen Bechtel Fund, and the Resources Legacy Fund as part of the Delta Solutions program at UC Davis. This analysis would not have been possible without information and review provided willingly by dozens of biologists statewide, making this a true community effort. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect official opinion of any institution.


  1. Akari H, Arden W, Olsen E, Cooper B, Blouin M (2007a) Reproductive success of captive-bred steelhead trout in the wild: evaluation of three hatchery programs in the Hood River. Conserv Biol 21:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akari H, Cooper B, Blouin M (2007b) Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild. Science 318:100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akari H, Berejikian B, Ford M, Blouin M (2008) Fitness of hatchery-reared salmonids in the wild. Evol Appl 1:342–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akari H, Cooper B, Blouin M (2009) Carry-over effect of captive breeding reduces reproductive fitness of wild-born descendants in the wild. Biol Lett 5:621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allendorf FW, Ryman N (1987) Genetic management of hatchery stocks. In: Ryman N, Utter F (eds) Population genetics and fishery management. Univ Washington Pr, Seattle, pp 141–159Google Scholar
  6. Allendorf FW, Waples RS (1996) Conservation and genetics of Salmonid fishes. Conservation genetics: case histories from nature, pp 238–280Google Scholar
  7. Beamish RJ (1993) Climate and exceptional fish production off the West Coast of North America. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:2270–2291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beamish RJ, Nevile CEM, Cass AJ (1997) Production of Fraser River sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in relation to decadal-scale changes in the climate and the ocean. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:543–554Google Scholar
  9. Behnke RJ (2002) Trout and salmon of North America. Free Press, New York, p 359Google Scholar
  10. Bisson PA, Coutant CC, Goodman D, Gramling R, Lettenmaier D, Lichatowich J, Liss W, Loudenslager E, McDonald L, Philipp D (2002) Hatchery surpluses in the Pacific Northwest. Fisheries 27:16–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brett JR (1971) Energetic responses of salmon to temperature. A Study of some thermal relations in the physiology and freshwater ecology of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Am Zool 11:99–113Google Scholar
  12. Brown LR, Moyle PB, Yoshiyama RM (1994) Historical decline and current status of Coho salmon in California. N Am J Fish Manag 14:237–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown DK, Echelle AA, Propst DL, Brooks JE, Fisher WL (2001) Catastrophic wildfire and number of populations as factors influencing risk of extinction for Gila trout (Oncorhynchus gilae). West N Am Nat 61:139–148Google Scholar
  14. California Data Exchange Center (2009) Klamath River watershed historical precipitation and outflows. In: Calif Dep Water Resouces (ed)Google Scholar
  15. Carmona-Catot G, Moyle PB, Simmons RE (2011) Long-term captive breeding does not necessarily prevent reestablishment: lessons learned from Eagle Lake rainbow trout. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries. Published online 8-28-2011Google Scholar
  16. Carr ME (2001) Estimation of potential productivity in eastern boundary currents using remote sensing. Deep-Sea Res 49:59–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carlson SM, Satterthwaite WH, Fleming IA (2011) Weakened portfolio effect in a collapsed salmon population complex. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68:1579–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cayan D, Bromirski P, Hayhoe K, Tyree M, Dettinger M, Flick R (2008) Climate change projections of sea level extremes along the California coast. Clim Chang 87:57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chilcote MW, Leider SA, Loch JJ (1986) Differential reproductive success of hatchery and wild summer-run steelhead under natural conditions. Trans Am Fish Soc 115:726–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chilcote M, Goodson K, Falcy M (2011) Reduced recruitment performance in natural populations of anadromous salmonids associated with hatchery-reared fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coronado C, Hilborn R (1998) Spatial and temporal factors affecting survival in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in the Pacific Northwest. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:2067–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crozier LG, Zabel RW, Hamlet AF (2008) Predicting differential effects of climate change at the population level with life-cycle models of spring Chinook salmon. Global Change Biol 14:236–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DiLorenzo E, Schneider N, Cobb KM, Franks PJS, Chhak K, Miller AJ, McWilliams JC, Bograd SJ, Arango H, Curchitser E, Powell TM, Rivière P (2008) North Pacific Gyre Oscillation links ocean climate and ecosystem change. Geophys Res Lett 35:6Google Scholar
  24. Dunham JB, Pilliod DS, Young MK (2004) Assessing the consequences of nonnative trout in headwater ecosystems in western North America. Fish 29:18–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ebersole JL, Liss WJ, Frissell CA (2001) Relationship between stream temperature, thermal refugia and rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss abundance in arid-land streams in the northwestern United States. Ecol Freshwat Fish 10:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flick WA, Webster DA (1964) Comparativ first year survival and production in wild and domestic strains of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. Trans Am Fish Soc 93:58–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ford MJ (2002) Selection in captivity during supportive breeding my reduce fitness in the wild. Conserv Bio 16:815–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Galbraith H, Jones R, Park R, Clough J, Herrod-Julius S, Harrington B, Page G (2002) Global climate change and sea level rise: potential losses of intertidal habitat for shorebirds. Waterbirds 25:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goodman D (2005) Selection equilibrium for hatchery and wild spawning fitness in integrated breeding programs. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:374–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greene CW (1952) Results from stocking brook trout of wild and hatchery strains at Stillwater Pond. Trans Am Fish Soc 81:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Greene CM, Hall JE, Guilbault KR, Quinn TP (2010) Improved viability of populations with diverse life-history portfolios. Biol Lett 6(3):382–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gresswell RE (1999) Fire and aquatic ecosystems in forested biomes of North America. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:193–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamlet AF, Mote PW, Clark MP, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Effects of temperature and precipitation variability on snowpack trends in the western United States. J Clim 18:4545–4561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hanak E, Lund J, Dinar A, Gray B, Howitt R, Mount J, Moyle P, Thompson B (2011) Managing California’s water: from conflict to reconciliation. Public Policy Inst Calif, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  35. Hare SR, Francis RC (1995) Climate change and salmon production in the northeast Pacific Ocean. In: Beamish RJ (ed) Climate change and northern fish populations. National Research Council Canada, Ottowa, pp 357–372Google Scholar
  36. Hauri C, Gruber N, Plattner GK, Alin S, Feely RA, Hales B, Wheeler PA (2009) Ocean acidification in the California current system. Ocean 22:60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hayhoe K, Cayan D, Field CB, Frumhoff PC, Maurer EP, Miller NL, Moser SC, Schneider SH, Cahill KN, Cleland EE, Dale L, Drapek R, Hanemann M, Kalkstein LS, Lenihan J, Lunch CK, Neilson RP, Sheridan SC, Verville JH (2004) Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:12422–12427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hays GC, Richardson AJ, Robinson C (2005) Climate change and marine plankton. Trends Ecol Evol 20:337–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heard WR (1998) Do hatchery salmon affect the North Pacific Ocean ecosystem? NPa. Anadr Fish Comm Bull 1:405–411Google Scholar
  40. Hilborn R, Quinn TP, Schindler DE, Rogers DE (2003) Biocomplexity and fisheries sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:6564–6568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Solomon et al. (ed), Cambridge Univ. Pr, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  42. Isaak DJ, Thurow RF, Rieman BE, Dunham JB (2007) Chinook salmon use of spawning patches: relative roles of habitat quality, size, and connectivity. Eco Appl 17:352–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. JMP, Version 9 (2011) SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  44. Kaeriyama M, Nakamura M, Edapalina R, Bower J, Yamaguchi H, Walker R, Myers K (2004) Change in feeding ecology and trophic dynamics of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp) in the central Gulf of Alaska in relation to climate events. Fish Ocean 13:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Knowles N, Cayan DR (2002) Potential effects of global warming on the Sacramento/San Joaquin watershed and the San Francisco estuary. Geophys Res Lett 29:1891–1894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krkosek M, Lewis MA, Volpe JP (2005) Transmission dynamics of parasitic sea lice from farm to wild salmon. Proc R Soc B 272:689–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kostow K (2009) Factors that contribute to the ecological risks of salmon and steelhead hatchery programs and some mitigating strategies. Rev Fish Biol Fish 19:9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lackey RT, Lach D, Duncan S (eds) (2006) Salmon 2100: the future of wild Pacific salmon. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland, p 629Google Scholar
  49. Lehodey P, Alheit J, Barange M, Baumgartner T, Beaugrand G, Drinkwater K, Fromentin J-M, Hare SR, Ottersen G, Perry RI, Roy C, Lingen C, Werneri F (2006) Climate variability, fish and fisheries. J Clim 19:5009–5030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Levin PS, Williams JG (2002) Interspecific effects of artificially propagated fish: an additional conservation risk for salmon. Conserv Bio 16:1581–1587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Levin PS, Zabel RW, Williams JG (2001) The road to extinction is paved with good intentions: negative association of fish hatcheries with threatened salmon. Proc Royal Soc London, Series B: Bio Sci 268:1153Google Scholar
  52. Lindley ST, Grimes CB, Mohr MS, Peterson WT, Stein JE, Anderson JJ, Botsford LW, Bottom DL, Busack CA, Collier TK (2009) What caused the Sacramento River fall Chinook stock collapse? US Dept of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Fisheries Ecology DivisionGoogle Scholar
  53. Lund J, Hanak E, Fleenor W, Howitt R, Mount J, Moyle P (2007) Envisioning futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Public Policy Institute of California, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  54. Lynch M, Healy M (2001) Captive breeding and the genetic fitness of natural populations. Conserv Genet 2:363–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mantua NJ, Hare SR, Zhang Y, Wallace JM, Francis RC (1997) A pacific interdecadal climate oscillation with impacts on salmon production. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:1069–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Marchetti MP, Moyle PB (2001) Effects of flow regime on fish assemblages in a regulated California stream. Ecol Appl 11:530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marchetti MP, Moyle PB, Levine R (2004) Alien fishes in California watersheds: characteristics of successful and failed invaders. Ecol Appl 14:587–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McCullough DA (1999) A review and synthesis of effects of alterations to the water temperature regime on freshwater life stages of salmonids, with special reference to Chinook salmon. US EPA, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  59. McCusker MR, Parkinson E, Taylor EB (2000) Mitochondrial DNA variation in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) across its native range: testing biogeographical hypotheses and their relevance to conservation. Mol Ecol 9:2089–2108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McGowan JA, Cayan DR, Dorman LM (1998) Climate-ocean variability and ecosystem response in the Northeast Pacific. Science 281:210–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mohseni O, Stefan HG, Eaton JG (2003) Global warming and potential changes in fish habitat in U.S. streams. Clim Chang 59:389– 409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Montgomery DR (2003) King of fish: the thousand-year run of salmon. Westview PressGoogle Scholar
  63. Mote PW, Hamlet AF, Clark MP, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Declining mountain snowpack in western North America. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 86:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mote PW, Parson EA, Hamlet AF, Keeton WS, Lettenmaier D, Mantua N, Miles EL, Peterson DW, Peterson DL, Slaughter R, Snover AK (2003) Preparing for climatic change: the water, salmon, and forests of the Pacific Northwest. Clim Chang 59:389–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moyle PB (1969) Comparative behavior of young brook trout of domestic and wild origin. Prog Fish-Cult 31:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Moyle PB (2002) Inland fishes of California. Regents of the University of California, Berkeley, p 502Google Scholar
  67. Moyle PB, Marchetti MP (2006) Predicting invasion success: freshwater fishes in California as model. BioSci 56:515–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Moyle PB, Purdy SE, Israel JA (2008) Salmon, steelhead, and trout in California: status of an emblematic fauna. California Trout, San Francisco, p 316Google Scholar
  69. Moyle PB, Katz JVE, Quiñones RM (2011) Rapid decline of California’s native inland fishes: a status assessment. Biol Cons 144:2414–2423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Moyle PB, Quiñones RM, Katz JVE (in press) California fish species of special concern, 3rd edn. California Department of Fish and Game, Rancho CordovaGoogle Scholar
  71. Mueter FJ, Peterman RM, Pyper BJ (2002) Opposite effects of ocean temperature on survival rates of 120 stocks of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) in northern and southern areas. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:456–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Naish KA, Hard JJ (2008) Bridging the gap between the genotype and the phenotype: linking genetic variation, selection and adaptation in fishes. Fish Fish 9:396–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. National Marine Fisheries Service (2010) Public draft recovery plan for central California coast Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) Evolutionarily Significant Unit. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Region, Santa Rosa, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  74. Nickelson T (2003) The influence of hatchery coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) on the productivity of wild coho salmon populations in Oregon coastal basins. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1050–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nickelson TE, Solazzi MF, Johnson SL (1986) Use of hatchery coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) presmolts to rebuild wild populations in Oregon coastal streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43:2443–2449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nielsen EE, Hansen MM, Loeschcke V (1999) Genetic variation in time and space: microsatellite analysis of extinct and extant populations of Atlantic salmon. Evolution 53:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Noss RF, Franklin JF, Baker WL, Schoennagel T, Moyle PB (2006) Managing fire-prone forests in the western United States. Front Ecol Environ 9:481–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pearsons TN, Temple GM (2010) Changes to rainbow trout abundance and salmonid biomass in a Washington watershed as related to hatchery salmon supplementation. Trans Am Fish Soc 139:502–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pierce DW (2004) Future changes in biological activity in the North Pacific Due to anthropogenic forcing of the physical environment. Clim Chang 62:389–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Quiñones RM, Moyle PB (in press) Integrating global climate change into salmon and trout conservation: a case study of the Klamath River. In: Root TL, Hall KR, Herzog M, Howell CA (eds) Linking science and management to conserve biodiversity in a changing climate. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  81. Reisenbichler RR, Rubin SP (1999) Genetic changes from artificial propagation of Pacific salmon affect the productivity and variability of supplemented populations. ICES J Mar Sci 56:459–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Reusch TBH, Ehlers A, Hämmerli A, Worm B (2005) Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:2826PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Richter A, Kolmes S (2005) Maximum temperature limits for Chinook, coho, and chum salmon, and steelhead trout in the Pacific Northwest. Rev Fish Sci 13:23–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Roessig JM, Woodley CM, Cech JJ, Hansen LJ (2004) Effects of global climate change on marine and estuarine fishes and fisheries. Rev Fish Biol Fish 14:251–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rogers LA, Schindler DE (2008) Asynchrony in population dynamics of sockeye salmon in southwestern Alaska. Oikos 117:1578–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Scavia D, Field J, Boesch D, Buddemeier R, Burkett V, Cayan D, Fogarty M, Harwell M, Howarth R, Mason C, Reed D, Royer T, Sallenger A, Titus J (2002) Climate change impacts on U.S. coastal and marine ecosystems. Estuar Coast 25:149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Scheuerell MD, Williams JG (2005) Forecasting climate-induced changes in the survival of Snake River spring/summer Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Fish Ocean 14:448–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Schindler DE, Augerot X, Fleishman E, Mantua NJ, Riddell B, Ruckelshaus M, Seeb J, Webster M (2008) Climate change, ecosystem impacts, and management for Pacific salmon. Fisheries 33:502–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Schwing FB, Mendelssohn R, Bograd SJ, Overland JE, Wang M, Ito S (2010) Climate change, teleconnection patterns, and regional processes forcing marine populations in the Pacific. J Mar Syst 79:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stewart IT, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2004) Changes in snowmelt runoff timing in Western North America under a ‘business as usual’ climate change scenario. Clim Chang 62:217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Stewart IT, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2005) Changes toward earlier streamflow timing across Western North America. J Clim 18:1136–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Unwin MJ, Glova GJ (1997) Changes in life history parameters in a naturally spawning population of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) associated with releases of hatchery-reared fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1235–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sugihara NG, Van Wagtendong JW, Shaffer KE, Fites-Kaulfman J, Thode AE (eds) (2006) Fire in California’s ecosystems. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  94. VanDevelder P (2011) A fish tale in the Land of Oz. High Country News, PaoiniaGoogle Scholar
  95. Wang M, Overland JE, Bond NA (2010) Climate projections for selected large marine ecosystems. J Mar Syst 79:258–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Waples RS, Pess GR, Beechie T (2008) Evolutionary history of Pacific salmon in dynamic environments. Evol Appl 1:189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Waples RS, Beechie T, Pess GR (2009) Evolutionary history, habitat disturbance regimes, and anthropogenic changes: what do these mean for resilience of Pacific salmon populations? Ecol Soc 14:3Google Scholar
  98. Wells BK, Grimes CB, Sneva JG, McPherson S, Waldvogel JB (2008) Relationships between oceanic conditions and growth of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from California, Washington, and Alaska, USA. Fish Ocean 17:101–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Williams JG (2006) Central Valley salmon: a perspective on Chinook and steelhead in the Central Valley of California. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 4Google Scholar
  100. Williamson K, May B (2005) Homogenization of fall-run chinook salmon gene pools in the central valley of California, USA. N Am J Fish Manag 25:993–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Yoshiyama RM, Fisher FW, Moyle PB (1998) Historical abundance and decline of Chinook salmon in the Central Valley Region of California. N Am J Fish Manag 18:487–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Yoshiyama RM, Moyle PB, Gerstung ER, Fisher FW (2000) Chinook salmon in the California Central Valley: an assessment. Fisheries 25:6–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob Katz
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Peter B. Moyle
    • 2
  • Rebecca M. Quiñones
    • 2
  • Joshua Israel
    • 3
    • 4
  • Sabra Purdy
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Center for Watershed Sciences and Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  3. 3.Applied Science Branch, Mid-Pacific Region, Bureau of ReclamationSacramentoUSA
  4. 4.Department of Animal ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations