Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 96, Issue 5, pp 573–584 | Cite as

Diversity in interspecific interactions between a nest-associating species, Pungtungia herzi, and multiple host species

  • Hideyuki Yamane
  • Katsutoshi Watanabe
  • Yoshikazu Nagata


Nest association in fishes affects the reproductive success of the host to varying degrees, from complete failure of the host’s reproduction to fitness advantages. Such varying impacts of nest association are considered to result from both the associate’s behavior and the characteristics of the host’s reproduction. To investigate the relationship between the impact of nest associate and host/associate ecology as well as evolutionary strategies involving nest association, we compared reproductive strategies and success between an associate East Asian minnow, Pungtungia herzi, and two host fishes (a goby, Odontobutis obscura, and a catfish, Pseudobagrus nudiceps) that have different reproductive ecologies. The associate frequently spawned around the days on which both hosts spawned, and gained a fitness advantage through continuous egg protection. Spawning by the associate had a negative effect on the survival of O. obscura eggs. Male O. obscura tended to abandon their nest when it was parasitized during the pre-spawning period. This is likely a tactic to alleviate the costs of brood parasitism. In contrast, survival of P. nudiceps eggs was consistently high in all nests, regardless of the intensity of associate’s spawning, and P. nudiceps young fed on cyprinid offspring (most probably the associate’s eggs/young) in the nest. Both P. nudiceps and P. herzi populations likely gain fitness benefits from their relationship. When comparing these two hosts with another known host, the freshwater perch Coreoperca kawamebari, the observed differences in the impact of nest association to the associate species likely correspond to differences in the spatial reproductive resources used by the respective hosts.


Evolutionary strategy Fitness effect Host-associate relationship Nest association 



We are grateful to M. Hori, T. Sota, H. Ochi, H. Hata, T. Sato, H. Nakagawa, N. Suzuki, T. Karube, D. Takahashi, J. Kishimoto and the members of the Laboratory of Animal Ecology of Kyoto University for their support and valuable discussions. This study was supported by the Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from the Japan Science Society, a research grant from the Kansai Organization for Nature Conservation, a grant for Biodiversity Research of the 21st Century COE (A14), and the Global COE Program (A06) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.


  1. Baba R, Nagata Y, Yamagishi S (1990) Brood parasitism and egg robbing among three freshwater fish. Anim Behav 40:776–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baba R (1994) Timing of spawning and host-nest choice for brood parasitism by the Japanese minnow, Pungtungia herzi, on the Japanese aucha perch, Siniperca kawamebari. Ethology 98:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baba R, Karino K (1998) Countertactics of the Japanese aucha perch Siniperca kawamebari against brood parasitism by the Japanese minnow Pungtungia herzi. J Ethol 16:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balon RK (1975) Reproductive guilds of fishers: a proposal and definition. J Fish Res Board Can 32:821–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies NB, Brooke ML (1988) Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counteradaptation. Anim Behav 36:262–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoo, cowbirds and other cheats. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Gray SM, Dill LM, McKinnon JS (2007) Cuckoldry incites cannibalism: male fish turn to cannibalism when perceived certainty of paternity decreases. Am Nat 169:258–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hastings PA (1988) Female choice and male reproductive success in the angel blenny, Coralliozetus angelica (Teleostei: Chaenopsidae). Anim Behav 36:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hauber ME (2003) Hatching asynchrony, nesting competition, and the cost of interspecific brood parasitism. Behav Ecol 14:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Iwata A (2001) Odontobutis obscura. In: Kawanabe H, Mizuno N, Hosoya K (eds) Freshwater fishes of Japan, 3rd edn. Yamakei, Tokyo, pp 558–559 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  11. Johnston CE (1994) Nest association in fishes: evidence for mutualism. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:379–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kilner RM, Nodel DG, Davies NB (1999) Signals of need in parent-offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo. Nature 397:667–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kilner RM (2005) The evolution of virulence in brood parasites. Ornithol Sci 4:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mashiko K (1976a) Reproductive behavior of an eleotrid goby Odontobutis obscurus in aquaria. Jpn J Ichthyol 23:69–78Google Scholar
  15. Mashiko K (1976b) Ecological study on breeding of an eleotrid goby, Odontobutis obscurus (Temminck et Schlegel), under rearing conditions. Jpn J Ecol 26:91–100Google Scholar
  16. McKaye KR (1981) Natural selection and the evolution of interspcific brood care in fishes. In: Alexander RD, Tinkle DW (eds) Natural selection and social behavior. Chiron Press, New York, pp 173–183Google Scholar
  17. Nagata Y, Maehata M (1991) Utilization of nests of eleotrid goby, Odontobutis obscurus by minnow, Pungtungia herzi. Annual Report Biwako Bunkakan 9:17–20Google Scholar
  18. Nakamura M (1969) Cyprinid fishes of Japan—Studies on the life history of cyprinid fishes of Japan—. Research Institute for Natural Resources, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  19. Natsumeda T (1998) Size-assortative nest choice by the Japanese fluvial sculpin in the presence of male-male competition. J Fish Biol 53:33–38Google Scholar
  20. Neff BD (2003) Paternity and condition affect cannibalistic behavior in nest-tending bluegill sunfish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Payne RB (1977) The ecology of brood parasitism in birds. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 8:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  23. Rothstein SI (1990) A model system for coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 21:481–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sato NJ, Tokue K, Noske RA, Mikami OK, Ueda K (2010) Evicting cuckoo nestlings from the nest: a new anti-parasitism behaviour. Biol Lett 6:67–69PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sato T (1986) A brood parasitic catfish of mouthbrooding cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyika. Nature 323:58–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shao B (1997) Effects of golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleuca) nest association on host pumpkinseeds (Lepomis gibbosus): evidence for a non-parasitic relationship. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Unger LM, Sargent RC (1988) Alloparental care in the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas: females prefer males with eggs. Behave Ecol Sociobiol 23:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wisenden BD (1999) Alloparental care in fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish 9:45–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wootton RJ (1998) The ecology of teleost fishes. Fish & Fisheries Series, no. 24, 2nd edn. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  30. Yamane H, Yokoyama T, Nagata Y, Yamada T (2004) Reproductive ecology and early life history of the bagrid catfish, Pseudobagrus nudiceps. Jpn J Ichthyol 51:135–147 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  31. Yamane H, Watanabe K (2008) Nesting site limitation and the use of artificial nests by the bagrid catfish, Pseudobagrus nudiceps, in a small stream. Bulletin of Kansai Organization for Nature Conservation 30:29–34 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  32. Yamane H, Watanabe K, Nagata Y (2009) Flexibility of reproductive tactics and their consequences in the brood parasitic fish Pungtungia herzi (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). J Fish Biol 75:563–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hideyuki Yamane
    • 1
    • 3
  • Katsutoshi Watanabe
    • 1
  • Yoshikazu Nagata
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Animal Ecology, Department of Zoology, Graduate School of ScienceKyoto UniversitySakyo-kuJapan
  2. 2.Laboratory of Animal EcologyOsaka Kyoiku UniversityKashiwaraJapan
  3. 3.Houbai Junior High SchoolTakarazukaJapan

Personalised recommendations