Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 94, Issue 4, pp 615–622 | Cite as

Body shape variation and colour change during growth in a protogynous fish

  • Carmelo FrucianoEmail author
  • Concetta Tigano
  • Venera Ferrito


Protogynous sequential hermaphroditism is very common in marine fish. Despite a large number of studies on various aspects of sequential hermaphroditism in fish, the relationship between body shape and colour during growth in dichromatic species has not been assessed. Using geometric morphometrics, the present study explores the relationship between growth, body shape and colouration in Coris julis (L. 1758), a small protogynous labrid species with distinct colour phases. Results show that body shape change during growth is independent of change in colour phase, a result which can be explained by the biology of the species and by the social control of sex change. Also, during growth the body grows deeper and the head has a steeper profile. It is hypothesized that a deeper body and a steeper profile might have a function in agonistic interactions between terminal phase males and that the marked chromatic difference between colour phases allows the lack of strict interdependence of body shape and colour during growth.


Geometric morphometrics Labridae Labrids Colour change Protogyny Parallel coordinates 



The authors would like to acknowledge the precious contribution of F. James Rohlf who provided many useful suggestions at multiple stages. Enrico Arneri, Ferdinando Boero, G. Andrea de Lucia, Paolo Domenici, Maria Ghelia, Paolo Guidetti, Miquel Palmer, Sergio Ragonese, Alfonso Toscano and Nedo Vrgoc kindly helped in obtaining specimens used in the analysis.

Supplementary material

10641_2011_9968_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (24 kb)
Supplementary Fig. S1 Parallel coordinate plot of the first ten relative warps for all the studied specimens. Yellow = primary, blue = transition, pink = secondary. The plot shows a considerable overlap of the morphospace portions occupied by each colour phase (PDF 24 kb)
10641_2011_9968_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (16 kb)
Supplementary Fig. S2 Parallel coordinate plot of the first ten relative warps. For each colour phase only the quartiles are shown to highlight the degree of overlap among groups. Yellow = primary, blue = transition, pink = secondary. The plot shows that the overlap in morphospace occupation of primary, transitional and secondary individuals is not caused by a few outliers but it is evident even considering only the quartiles of the relative warps of each colour phase (PDF 15 kb)


  1. Arigoni S, Francour P, Harmelin-Vivien M, Zaninetti L (2002) Adaptive colouration of Mediterranean labrid fishes to the new habitat provided by the introduced tropical alga Caulerpa taxifolia. J Fish Biol 60:1486–1497Google Scholar
  2. Barber CB, Dobkin DP, Huhdanpaa HT (1996) The Quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM T Math Software 22(4):469–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow GW (1998) Sexual-selection models for exaggerated traits are useful but constraining. Am Zool 38:59–69Google Scholar
  4. Barlow GW, Siri P (1997) Does sexual selection account for the conspicuous head dimorphism in the Midas cichlid? Anim Behav 52:573–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentivegna F, Cirino P (1984) Sexual inversion in Coris julis L. 1758. Cybium 8(2):51–61Google Scholar
  6. Bentivegna F, Cirino P, Rasotto MB (1985) Further investigations into sex reversal of Coris julis L. (Pisces, Labridae). Boll Zool 52:355–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bookstein FL (1989) Size and shape: a comment on semantics. Syst Zool 38:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bookstein FL (1997) Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: localizing group differences in outline shape. Med Image Anal 1:225–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruslé S (1987) Sex-inversion of the hermaphroditic, protogynous teleost Coris julis L. (Labridae). J Fish Biol 30:605–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornwell WK, Schwilk DW, Ackerly DD (2006) A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology 87(6):1465–1471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frisch A (2004) Sex-change and gonadal steroids in sequentially-hermaphroditic teleost fish. Rev Fish Biol Fisher 14:481–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fruciano C (2009) Pattern di variazione morfologica e molecolare in Coris julis (L. 1758) (Teleostei, Labridae). Doctoral thesis, University of Catania.Google Scholar
  13. Fruciano C, Hanel R, Debes PV, Tigano C, Ferrito V (2011a) Atlantic-Mediterranean and within-Mediterranean molecular variation in Coris julis (L. 1758) (Teleostei, Labridae). Mar Biol 158:1271–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fruciano C, Tigano C, Ferrito V (2011b) Geographic morphological variation within and between colour phases in Coris julis (L. 1758), a protogynous marine fish. Biol J Linn Soc 104:148–162Google Scholar
  15. Fruciano C, Ferrito V, Tigano C (2011c) Traditional and geometric morphometrics detect morphological variation of lower pharyngeal jaw in Coris julis (Teleostei, Labridae). Ital J Zool 78(3):320–327Google Scholar
  16. Gomon MF, Randall JE (1984) Labridae. In: Fischer W and Bianchi G (eds) FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Western Indian Ocean fishing area 51. Vol. 2.Google Scholar
  17. Inselberg A (1985) The plane with parallel coordinates. Visual Comput 1:69–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klingenberg CP (2011) MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol Ecol Res 11:353–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuwamura T, Karino K, Nakashima Y (2000) Male morphological characteristics and mating success in a protogynous coral reef fish, Halichoeres melanurus. J Ethol 18:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lejeune P (1982) A propos de quelques Poissons de la Mediterraneé. Revue Francaise d’Aquariologie 9(1):27–32Google Scholar
  21. Michel C, Lejeune P, Voss J (1987) Biologie et comportement des Labridés européens (Labres, Crénilabres, Rouquiers, Vieilles et Girelles). Revue française d’Aquariologie 14:1–180Google Scholar
  22. Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Bernhard M, Schaefer K, Bookstein FL (2004) Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. J Hum Evol 46:679–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mullin SK, Taylor PJ (2002) The effects of parallax on geometric morphometric data. Comput Biol Med 32:455–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Muñoz RC, Warner RR (2003) A new version of the size-advantage hypothesis for sex change: incorporating sperm competition and size-fecundity skew. Am Nat 161(5):749–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Muñoz RC, Warner RR (2004) Testing a new version of the size-advantage hypothesis for sex change: sperm competition and size-skew effects in the bucktooth parrotfish, Sparisoma radians. Behav Ecol 15(1):129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ohta K, Hirano M, Mine T, Mizutani H, Yamaguchi A, Matsuyama M (2008) Body color change and serum steroid hormone levels throughout the process of sex change in the adult wrasse, Pseudolabrus sieboldi. Mar Biol 153(5):843–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Perez IS, Bernal V, Gonzalez PN (2006) Differences between sliding semilandmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation. J Anat 208:769–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Randall JE, Kuiter RH (1982) Three new Labrid fishes of the genus Coris from the Western Pacific. Pac Sci 36(2):159–173Google Scholar
  29. Reinboth R (1967) Biandric Teleost species. Gen Comp Endocr, Abstracts, 9: no. 146.Google Scholar
  30. Reinboth R (1975) Spontaneous and hormone-induced sex-inversion in wrasses (Labridae). Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli 39(suppl):550–573Google Scholar
  31. Reinboth R (1988) Physiological problems of teleost ambisexuality. Environ Biol Fish 22(4):249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reinboth R, Brusle-Sicard S (1997) Histological and ultrastructural studies on the effects of hCG on sex inversion in the protogynous teleost Coris julis. J Fish Biol 51:738–749Google Scholar
  33. Rohlf FJ (2006) tpsDig, digitize landmarks and outlines, version 2.10. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
  34. Rohlf FJ (2007a) tpsRelw, relative warps analysis, version 1.45. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
  35. Rohlf FJ (2007b)tpsRegr, shape regression, version 1.33. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
  36. Shapiro DY (1979) Social behavior, group structure, and the control of sex reversal in hermaphroditic fish. In: Rosenblatt JS, Hinde RA, Beer C and Busnel M-C (eds), Advances in the Study of Behavior, Academic PressVolume 10, Pages 43–102, ISSN 0065–3454, ISBN 9780120045105, doi:  10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60093-5.
  37. Shapley RL (2004) Assessing parallel coordinates visualizations for prestatistical exploration of biological systematics data. Unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
  38. Tortonese E (1970) Fauna d'Italia - Osteichthyes - Pesci Ossei. Ed. Calderini Bologna.Google Scholar
  39. Valentin AE, Penin X, Chanut J-P, Sévigny J-M, Rohlf FJ (2008) Arching effect on fish body shape in geometric morphometric studies. J Fish Biol 73:623–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Warner RR (1984) Mating behavior and hermaphroditism in coral reef fishes. Am Sci 72(2):128–136Google Scholar
  41. Warner RR (1988) Sex change in fishes: hypotheses, evidence, and objections. Env Biol Fish 22(2):81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Warner RR, Muñoz RC (2008) Needed: a dynamic approach to understand sex change. Anim Behav 75:e11–e14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Warner RR, Robertson DR (1978) Sexual patterns in the labroid fishes of the western Caribbean, I: the Wrasses (Labridae). Smithson Contrib Zool 254:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Warner RR, Schultz ET (1992) Sexual selection and male characteristics in the bluehead wrasse, Thalassoma bifasciatum: mating site acquisition, mating site defense, and female choice. Evolution 46(5):1421–1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wegman EJ (1990) Hyperdimensional data analysis using parallel coordinates. J Am Stat Assoc 85:664–675Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmelo Fruciano
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Concetta Tigano
    • 1
  • Venera Ferrito
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze BiologicheGeologiche e Ambientali, Sezione di Biologia animale “Marcello La Greca”—University of CataniaCataniaItaly
  2. 2.Laboratory for Zoology and Evolutionary BiologyDepartment of Biology—University of KonstanzKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations