Diel variation in use of cover and feeding activity of a benthic freshwater fish in response to olfactory cues of a diurnal predator
- 295 Downloads
Some fish recognize the threat of predatory fish through chemical cues, which may result in variation in diel activity. However, there is little experimental evidence of diel shifts in activity of prey fish in response to the diel activity of a predator. We compared the total prey consumed and the use of cover by common bullies (Gobiomorphus cotidianus), a native benthic feeding eleotrid, when exposed to the odour of an exotic predator, European perch (Perca fluviatilis), over a 12-h period. Our results showed no significant effect of perch odour on feeding activity, but a significant increase in the use of cover at night and a decrease in the use of cover by day. While common bullies may recognize the presence of a predator through chemical cues, dark conditions may inhibit this and other sensory mechanisms, affecting their ability to recognize the proximity of a predator. For example, during the daytime they may rely on visual cues to initiate cover-seeking behavior, but in the dark, vision is impaired giving them less warning of predators, thus potentially making them more vulnerable.
KeywordsChemical cues Gobiomorphus cotidianus Mysid Perca fluviatilis Predator cues Sensory
We would like to acknowledge the Department of Zoology at the University of Otago for providing the equipment and laboratory resources necessary for this study. We thank Andrew Hicks and Kim Garrett for their assistance with fish collection and aquaria maintenance as well as providing input on the experimental design.
- Brown GE (2003) Learning about danger: chemical alarm cues and local risk assessment in prey fishes. Fish Fish 4:227–234Google Scholar
- Brown C, Laland KN (2003) Social learning in fishes: a review. Fish Fish 4:280–288Google Scholar
- Janssen J (2004) Lateral line sensory ecology. In: Emde G, Mogdans J, Kapoor BG (eds) The senses of fish: adaptations for the reception of natural stimuli. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 231–264Google Scholar
- Kelley JL, Magurran AE (2003) Learned predator recognition and antipredator responses in fishes. Fish Fish 4:216–226Google Scholar
- Ludgate BG, Closs GP (2003) Responses of fish communities to sustained removals of perch (Perca fluviatilis). Science for Conservation 210. Department of Conservation, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
- McDowall RM (1990) New Zealand freshwater fishes: a natural history and guide. Heinemann Reed, AucklandGoogle Scholar
- McDowall RM (2000) The reed field guide to New Zealand freshwater fishes. Reed Books, AucklandGoogle Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 2.10.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar