Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 94, Issue 1, pp 7–19 | Cite as

Mechanisms influencing competition between hatchery and wild juvenile anadromous Pacific salmonids in fresh water and their relative competitive abilities

  • Christopher P. TataraEmail author
  • Barry A. Berejikian
Article

Abstract

Avoiding negative effects of competition from released hatchery salmonids on wild fish is a primary concern for recovery efforts and fisheries management. Several factors affect competition among juvenile salmonids including: (1) whether competition is intra- or interspecific, (2) duration of freshwater cohabitation of hatchery and wild fish, (3) relative body size, (4) prior residence, (5) environmentally induced developmental differences, and (6) fish density. Intraspecific competition is expected to be greater than interspecific because of greater niche overlap between conspecific hatchery and wild fish. Competition is expected to increase with prolonged freshwater cohabitation. Hatchery smolts are often larger than wild, and larger fish are usually superior competitors. However, wild fish have the advantage of prior residence when defending territories and resources in natural streams. Hatchery-induced developmental differences are variable and can favor both hatchery and wild fish. Although all these factors influence competitive interactions, fish density of the composite population (wild + hatchery fish) in relation to habitat carrying capacity likely exerts the greatest influence. The extent of competition and relative competitive ability of wild and hatchery fish can be determined by additive and substitutive experimental designs, respectively, and the limited body of substitutive experiments suggests that the relative competitive ability of hatchery and wild fish is approximately equal when measured as growth. Conducting substitutive experiments becomes difficult as the spatial and temporal scales increase. Large-scale experiments comparing supplemented and control reaches or streams hold some promise for quantifying the effects of released hatchery fish on wild fish behavior, growth and survival.

Keywords

Competition Hatchery and wild Pacific salmonids Freshwater life stage Relative competitive ability 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Jonathan Lee for his assistance in the early stages of formulating the ideas presented in this manuscript.

References

  1. Abbott JC, Dunbrack RL, Orr CD (1985) The interaction of size and experience in dominance relationships of juvenile steelhead trout (Salmo gairdneri). Behaviour 92:241–253Google Scholar
  2. Archer J (1987) The biology of aggression. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong JD (1997) Self-thinning in juvenile sea trout and other salmonid fishes revisited. J Anim Ecol 66:519–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berejikian BA, Larsen DA, Swanson P et al (2011) Development of natural growth regimes for hatchery-reared steelhead to reduce residualism, fitness loss, and negative ecological interactions. Environ Biol Fish. doi: 10.1007/s10641-011-9788-0
  5. Birch LC (1957) The meanings of competition. Am Nat 91:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bisson PA, Sullivan K, Nielsen JL (1988) Channel hydraulics, habitat use, and body form of juvenile coho salmon, steelhead, and cutthroat trout in streams. Trans Am Fish Soc 117:262–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brannon EL, Powell MS, Quinn TP et al (2004) Population structure of Columbia River Basin chinook salmon and steelhead trout. Rev Fish Sci 12:99–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bohlin T, Sundstrom LF, Johnsson JI et al (2002) Density-dependent growth in brown trout: effects of introducing wild and hatchery fish. J Anim Ecol 71:683–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boldt JL, Haldorson LJ (2004) Size and condition of wild and hatchery pink salmon juveniles in Prince William Sound, Alaska. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:173–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Close TL, Anderson CS (1992) Dispersal, density-dependent growth, and survival of stocked steelhead fry in Lake Superior tributaries. N Am J Fish Manag 12:728–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deverill JI, Adams CE, Bean CW (1999) Prior residence, aggression and territory acquisition in hatchery-reared and wild brown trout. J Fish Biol 55:868–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunham JB, Vinyard GL (1997) Relationships between body mass, population density, and the self-thinning rule in stream-living salmonids. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1025–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Einum S, Fleming IA (2001) Implications of stocking: ecological interactions between wild and released salmonids. Nord J Freshw Res 75:56–70Google Scholar
  14. Elliott JM (1989) Mechanisms responsible for population regulation in young migratory trout, Salmo trutta. 1. The critical time for survival. J Anim Ecol 58:987–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott JM (1990) Mechanisms responsible for population regulation in young migratory trout, Salmon trutta. 2. Fish growth and size variation. J Anim Ecol 59:171–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fausch KD (1988) Tests of competition between native and introduced salmonids in streams – what have we learned. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:2238–2246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fausch KD (1998) Interspecific competition and juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): on testing effects and evaluating the evidence across scales. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:218–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grant JWA, Imre I (2005) Patterns of density-dependent growth in juvenile stream-dwelling salmonids. J Fish Biol 67(Supplement B):100–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gross MR, Coleman RM, McDowall RM (1988) Aquatic productivity and the evolution of diadromous fish migration. Science 239:1291–1293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harvey BC, Nakamoto RJ (1996) Effects of steelhead density on growth of coho salmon in a small coastal California stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 125:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hasegawa K, Yamamoto T, Murakami M et al (2004) Comparison of competitive ability between native and introduced salmonids: evidence from pairwise contests. Ichthyol Res 51:191–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hearn WE (1987) Interspecific competition and habitat segregation among stream-dwelling trout and salmon – a review. Fisheries 12:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hebdon JL, Kline P, Taki D et al (2004) Evaluating reintroduction strategies for Redfish Lake sockeye salmon captive broodstock progeny. In: Nickum MJ, Mazik PM, Nickum JG, MacKinlay DD (eds) Propagated fish in resource management. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 401–413Google Scholar
  24. Henderson MA, Cass AJ (1991) Effect of smolt size on smolt-to-adult survival for Chilko Lake sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:988–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hilborn R (1992) Hatcheries and the future of salmon in the northwest. Fisheries 17:5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hill MS, Zydlewski GB, Gale WL (2006) Comparisons between hatchery and wild steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) smolts: physiology and habitat use. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:1627–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holtby LB, Andersen BC, Kadowaki RK (1990) Importance of smolt size and early ocean growth to interannual variability in marine survival of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:2181–2194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hume JMB, Parkinson EA (1987) Effect of stocking density on the survival, growth, and dispersal of steelhead trout fry (Salmo gairdneri). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44:271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huntingford FA, deLeaniz CG (1997) Social dominance, prior residence and the acquisition of profitable feeding sites in juvenile Atlantic salmon. J Fish Biol 51:1009–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kato F (1991) Life histories of masu and amago salmon (Oncorhynchus masou and Oncorhynchus rhodurus). In: Groot C, Margolis L (eds) Pacific salmon life histories. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp 448–520Google Scholar
  31. Keeley ER (2003) An experimental analysis of self-thinning in juvenile steelhead trout. Oikos 102:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koenings JP, Burkett RD (1987) Population characteristics of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) smolts relative to temperature regimes, euphotic volume, fry density, and forage base within Alaskan lakes. Can Special Publication Fish Aquat Sci 96:216–234Google Scholar
  33. Kostow K (2009) Factors that contribute to the ecological risks of salmon and steelhead hatchery programs and some mitigating strategies. Rev Fish Biol Fish 19:9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Krebs JR, Davies NB (1987) Introduction to behavioural ecology. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Larsen DA, Beckman BR, Strom CR et al (2006) Growth modulation alters the incidence of early male maturation and physiological development of hatchery-reared spring Chinook salmon: a comparison with wild fish. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:1017–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laska MS, Wootton JT (1998) Theoretical concepts and empirical approaches to measuring interaction strength. Ecology 79:461–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McClure MM, Carlson SM, Beechie TJ et al (2008) Evolutionary consequences of habitat loss for Pacific anadromous salmonids. Evol Appl 1:300–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McMichael GA, Sharpe CS, Pearsons TN (1997) Effects of residual hatchery-reared steelhead on growth of wild rainbow trout and spring Chinook salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Metcalfe NB, Valdimarsson SK, Morgan IJ (2003) The relative roles of domestication, rearing environment, prior residence and body size in deciding territorial contests between hatchery and wild juvenile salmon. J Appl Ecol 40:535–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miyakoshi Y, Hayano H, Fujiwara M et al (1998) Assessment of hatchery origin and wild masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou) smolts in the Masuhoro River, 1996. Scientific Reports of the Hokkaido Fish Hatchery 52:1–10Google Scholar
  41. Miyakoshi Y, Nagata M, Kitada S (2001) Effect of smolt size on postrelease survival of hatchery-reared masu salmon Oncorhynchus masou. Fish Sci 67:134–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mobrand LE, Barr J, Blankenship L et al (2005) Hatchery reform in Washington state: principles and emerging issues. Fisheries 30:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morita K, Morita SH, Yamamoto S (2009) Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on salmonid fishes: lessons from white-spotted charr in Japan. Ecol Res 24:711–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ovidio M, Capra H, Philippart JC (2008) Regulated discharge produces substantial demographic changes on four typical fish species of a small salmonid stream. Hydrobiologia 609:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pearsons TN, Temple GM (2007) Impacts of early stages of salmon supplementation and reintroduction programs on three trout species. N Am J Fish Manag 27:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pearsons TN, Temple GM (2010) Changes to rainbow trout abundance and salmonid biomass in a Washington watershed as related to hatchery salmon supplementation. Trans Am Fish Soc 139:502–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peery CA, Bjornn TC (1996) Small-scale investigations into Chinook salmon supplementation strategies and techniques 1992–1994. Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Idaho, pp. 138Google Scholar
  48. Pettersson J, Johnsson JI, Bohlin T (1996) The competitive advantage of large body size declines with increasing group size in rainbow trout. J Fish Biol 49:370–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Quinn TP (2005) The behavior and ecology of Pacific salmon and trout. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  50. Randall RG, Healey MC, Dempson JB (1987) Variability in length of freshwater residence of salmon, trout, and char. Am Fish Soc Symp 1:27–41Google Scholar
  51. Reese C, Hillgruber N, Sturdevant M et al (2009) Spatial and temporal distribution and the potential for estuarine interactions between wild and hatchery chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in Taku Inlet, Alaska. Fish Bull 107:433–450Google Scholar
  52. Rhodes JS, Quinn TP (1998) Factors affecting the outcome of territorial contests between hatchery and naturally reared coho salmon parr in the laboratory. J Fish Biol 53:1220–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Riley SC, Fuss HJ, LeClair LL (2004) Ecological effects of hatchery-reared juvenile Chinook and coho salmon on wild juvenile salmonids in two Washington streams. N Am J Fish Manag 24:506–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Riley SC, Tatara CP, Scheurer JA (2005) Aggression and feeding of hatchery-reared and naturally reared steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fry in a laboratory flume and a comparison with observations in natural streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:1400–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Riley SC, Tatara CP, Berejikian BA et al (2009a) Behavior of steelhead fry in a laboratory stream is affected by fish density but not rearing environment. N Am J Fish Manag 29:1806–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Riley WD, Maxwell DL, Pawson MG, Ives MJ (2009b) The effects of low summer flow on wild salmon (Salmo salar), trout (Salmo trutta) and grayling (Thymallus thymallus) in a small stream. Freshw Biol 54:2581–2599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sabo JL, Pauley GB (1997) Competition between stream-dwelling cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) and coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch): effects of relative size and population origin. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:2609–2617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Small MP, Currens K, Johnson TH et al (2009) Impacts of supplementation: genetic diversity in supplemented and unsupplemented populations of summer chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) in Puget Sound (Washington, USA). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66:1216–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sundstrom LF, Bohlin T, Johnsson JI (2004) Density-dependent growth in hatchery-reared brown trout released into a natural stream. J Fish Biol 65:1385–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tatara CP, Riley SC, Scheurer JA (2008) Environmental enrichment in steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hatcheries: field evaluation of aggression, foraging, and territoriality in natural and hatchery fry. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:744–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tatara CP, Riley SC, Scheurer JA (2009) Growth, survival, and habitat use of naturally reared and hatchery steelhead fry in streams: effects of an enriched hatchery rearing environment. Trans Am Fish Soc 138:441–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Theriault V, Moyer GR, Banks MA (2010) Survival and life history characteristics among wild and hatchery coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) returns: how do unfed fry differ from smolt releases? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67:486–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tipping JM (1997) Effect of smolt length at release on adult returns of hatchery-reared winter steelhead. Progressive Fish-Culturist 59:310–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vehanen T, Huusko A, Hokki R (2009) Competition between hatchery-raised and wild brown trout Salmo trutta in enclosures - do hatchery releases have negative effects on wild populations? Ecol Freshwat Fish 18:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Viola AE, Schuck ML (1995) A method to reduce the abundance of residual hatchery steelhead in rivers. N Am J Fish Manag 15:488–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ward DM, Nislow KH, Armstrong JD, Einum S, Folt CL (2007) Is the shape of the density-growth relationship for stream salmonids evidence for exploitative rather than interference competition? J Anim Ecol 76:135–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weber ED, Fausch KD (2003) Interactions between hatchery and wild salmonids in streams: differences in biology and evidence for competition. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:1018–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Weber ED, Fausch KD (2005) Competition between hatchery-reared and wild juvenile Chinook salmon in enclosures in the Sacramento River, California. Trans Am Fish Soc 134:44–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Xu CL, Letcher BH, Nislow KH (2010) Size-dependent survival of brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis in summer: effects of water temperature and stream flow. J Fish Biol 76:2342–2369PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yamamoto S, Nakamura H, Koga K (2008) Interaction between hatchery and wild juvenile white-spotted charr Salvelinus leucomaenis in a stream enclosure experiment. J Fish Biol 73:861–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yamamoto S, Kitano S, Sakano H et al (2010) Differences in longitudinal distribution patterns along a Honshu stream of brown trout Salmo trutta, white-spotted charr Salvelinus leucomaenis and masu salmon Oncorhynchus masou. Fish Sci 76:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Young KA (2004) Asymmetric competition, habitat selection, and niche overlap in juvenile salmonids. Ecology 85:134–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NOAA FisheriesNorthwest Fisheries Science Center, Manchester Research StationManchesterUSA

Personalised recommendations