Ontogenetic divergence of growth among rainbow smelt morphotypes

Article

Abstract

Multiple, sympatric morphotypes of rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) are known in Lake Utopia, New Brunswick. The largest, ‘giant’ form is predominantly a piscivore, the smaller, ‘dwarf’ form are predominantly planktivores, and there is an intermediate body-sized form. The forms exhibit some genetic variability, but it is body size that best defines morphotypes, trophic status, and spawning behaviour. We compared egg size, spawning date, incubation time, size at hatching, and daily and annual growth to determine when divergence in body size occurs among morphotypes. Giant form larvae hatched earlier and grew faster during their first year. Dwarf and intermediate form larvae displayed inter-annual variability in degree of overlap and divergence in growth which occurred in their first growing season or at age 1+ or 2+. We conclude that earlier hatching, early growth trajectories, and later niche shifting are linked to the persistence of morphotypes, i.e., the process is controlled by the environment and sustained to some degree by spawning segregation.

Keywords

Osmerus Morphotypes Eggs Larvae Juvenile Phenotypic plasticity Niche shift 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Support for this work was provided by S. Currie, P. Seymour, and P. Cronin of the New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources, New Brunswick Wildlife Trust Fund, and R. Bradford, Fisheries and Oceans Canada. Staff at the St. Andrews Biological Station, Marine Fish Division of Fisheries and Oceans Canada provided equipment and laboratory support for otolith microstructure procedures. Reviews by R. Bradford, A. Valois, and several anonymous reviewers greatly improved the manuscript. We thank H. Boyd-Kinnie, M. Chiasson, E. Kitts, C. Doherty and M. Gautreau for their valuable help in the field and laboratory.

References

  1. Barrette M-F, Daigle G, Dodson JJ (2009) Intraspecific vicariant history and the evolution of adaptive morphological diversity in a fish species (Osmerus mordax). Biol J Linn Soc 97:140–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernatchez L, Vuorinen JA, Bodaly RA, Dodson JJ (1996) Genetic evidence for reproductive isolation and multiple origins of sympatric trophic ecotypes of whitefish (Coregonus). Evolution 50:624–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campana SE (1990) How reliable are growth back-calculations based on otoliths. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47:2219–2227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chernoff E, Curry RA (2007) First summer growth predetermined in anadromous and resident brook charr. J Fish Biol 70:334–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Claessen D, De Roos AM, Persson L (2000) Dwarfs and giants: cannibalism and competition in size-structured populations. Am Nat 155:219–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper JE (1978) Identification of eggs, larvae and juveniles of the rainbow smelt, Osmerus mordax, with comparisons to larval alewife, Alosa pseudoharengus and gizzard shad, Dorosoma cepedianum. Trans Am Fish Soc 107:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Copeman DG, McAllister DE (1978) Analysis of the effect of transplantation on morphometric and meristic characters in lake populations of the rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax (Mitchill). Env Biol Fish 3:253–259.Google Scholar
  8. Coulson MW, Bradbury IR, Bentzen P (2006) Temporal genetic differentiation: continuous v. discontinuous spawning runs in anadromous rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax (Mitchill). J Fish Biol 69(Suppl C):209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curry RA, Currie SL, Bernatchez L, Saint-Laurent R (2004) The rainbow smelt, Osmerus mordax, complex of Lake Utopia: threatened or misunderstood? Environ Biol Fish 69:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fenderson OC (1964) Evidence of subpopulations of lake whitefish, Coregonus clupeaformis, involving a dwarf form. Trans Am Fish Soc 93:77–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hair JF, Babin B, Anderson R (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  12. Hendry AP, Day T (2005) Population structure attributable to reproductive time: isolation by time and adaptation by time. Mol Ecol 14:901–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huss M, Byström P, Persson L (2008) Resource heterogeneity, diet shifts and intra-cohort competition: effects on size divergence in YOY fish. Oecologia 158:249–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huston MA, DeAngelis DL (1987) Size bimodality in monospecific populations: a critical review of potential mechanisms. Am Nat 129:678–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hutchings JA (1991) Fitness consequences of variation in egg size and food abundance in brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. Evolution 45:1162–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnston TA (1997) Downstream movements of young-of-the-year fishes in Catamaran Brook and the Little Southwest Miramichi River, New Brunswick. J Fish Biol 51:1047–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonsson B, Hindar K (1982) Reproductive strategy of dwarf and normal arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) from Vangsvatnet Lake, Western Norway. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:1404–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kamler E, Kato T (1983) Efficiency of yolk utilization by Salmo gairdneri in relation to incubation temperature and egg size. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 30:271–306Google Scholar
  19. Kazakov RV (1981) The effect of size of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., eggs on embryos and alevins. J Fish Biol 19:353–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lanteigne J, McAllister DE (1983) The pygmy smelt, Osmerus spectrum Cope, 1870, a forgotten sibling species of Eastern North American Fish. Ichthyology Section, National Museum of Natural Sciences, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  21. MacLean JA, Shuter BJ, Regier HA, MacLeod JC (1985) Temperature and year class strength of smallmouth bass. Rapp P V Reun Cons Int Explor Mer 178:30–40Google Scholar
  22. Mann GJ, McCart PJ (1981) Comparison of sympatric dwarf and normal populations of least cisco (Coregonus sardinella) inhabiting Trout Lake, Yukon Territory. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:240–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McKenzie RA (1958) Age and growth of smelt, Osmerus mordax (Mitchill), of the Miramichi River, New Brunswick. J Fish Res Bd Can 15:1313–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moore SA (2001) Delineation of sympatric morphotypes of lake trout in Lake Superior. Trans Am Fish Soc 130:1233–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nellbring S (1989) The ecology of smelts (genus Osmerus): a literature review. Nord J Freshw Res 65:116–145Google Scholar
  26. Olsson J, Eklöv P (2005) Habitat structure, feeding mode and morphologicalreversibility: factors influencing phenotypic plasticity in perch. Evol Ecol Res 7:1109–1123Google Scholar
  27. Olsson J, Svanbäck R, Eklöv P (2006) Growth rate constrain morphological divergence when driven by competition. Oikos 115:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Post DM (2003) Individual variation in the timing of ontogenetic niche shifts in largemouth bass. Ecology 84:1298–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Robinson BW, Parsons KJ (2002) Changing times, spaces, and faces: tests and implications of adaptive morphological plasticity in the fishes of northern postglacial lakes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1819–1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rupp RA, Redmond MA (1966) Transfer studies of ecologic and genetic variation in the American smelt. Ecology 47:253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Saint-Laurent R, Legault M, Bernatchez L (2003) Divergent selection maintains adaptive differentiation despite high gene flow between sympatric rainbow smelt ecotypes (Osmerus mordax Mitchill). Mol Ecol 12:315–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Secor DH, Dean JM, Laban EH (1992) Otolith removal and preparation for microstructural examination. In: Stevenson DK, Campana SE (eds) Otolith microstructure examination and analysis. Canadian Special Publications in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Ottawa, pp 19–57Google Scholar
  34. Shaw J (2006) Variation in early life-history characteristics of sympatric rainbow smelt populations in Lake Utopia, New Brunswick. MSc thesis. University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  35. Sirois P, Lecomte F, Dodson JJ (1998) An otolith-based back-calculation method to account for time-varying growth rate in rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) larvae. Can J Fish Aquat Scie 55:2662–2671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Skulason S (1986) Embryo size and early head shape in four sympatric morphs of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) in Thingvallavatn, Iceland. MSc thesis. University of Guelph, Guelph, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  37. Skulason S, Snorrason SS, Noakes DLG, Ferguson MM (1996) Genetic basis of life-history variations among sympatric morphs of Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:1807–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snorrason SS, Skulason S, Jonsson B, Malmquist HJ, Jonasson PM, Sandlund OT, Lindem T (1994) Trophic specialization in Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus (Pisces; Salmonidae): morphological divergence and ontogenetic niche shifts. Biol J Linn Soc 52:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taborsky B (2006) The influence of juvenile and adult environments on life-history trajectories. Proc Roy Soc B 273:741–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor EB (1999) Species pairs of north temperate freshwater fishes: Evolution, taxonomy, and conservation. Rev Fish Biol Fish 9:299–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taylor EB, Bentzen P (1993a) Evidence for multiple origins and sympatric divergence of trophic ecotypes of smelt (Osmerus) in northeastern North America. Evolution 47:813–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor EB, Bentzen P (1993b) Molecular genetic evidence for reproductive isolation between sympatric populations of smelt Osmerus in Lake Utopia, South-western New Brunswick, Canada. Mol Ecol 2:345–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thorpe JE, Morgan RIG, Ottaway EM, Miles MS (1980) Time of divergence of growth groups between potential 1 + and 2 + smolts among sibling Atlantic salmon. J Fish Biol 17:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Turgeon J, Estoup A, Bernatchez L (1999) Species flock in the North American great lakes: Molecular ecology of Lake Nipigon ciscoes (Teleostei: Coregonidae: Coregonus). Evolution 53:1857–1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Urbatzka R, Beeck P, van der Velde G, Borcherding J (2008) Alternative use of food resources causes intra-cohort variation in the size distribution of young-of-the-year perch (Perca fluviatilis). Ecol Fresh Fish 17:475–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Valdimarsson SK, Skulason S, Snorrason SS (2002) The relationship between egg size and the rate of early development in Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus. Environ Biol Fish 65:463–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, De Jong G, Scheiner SM, Schlichting CD, Van Tienderen PH (1995) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. TREE 10:212–217PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Werner EE, Gilliam JF (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:393–42Google Scholar
  49. West-Eberhard MJ (2002) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Canadian Rivers Institute, Department of Biology and Faculty of Forestry and Environmental ManagementUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada
  2. 2.Fish Population Science, Ecosystem Science DirectorateFisheries and Oceans CanadaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations