Effects of cyanobacterial toxin microcystin-LR on the transcription levels of immune-related genes in grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella
- 245 Downloads
Recent studies in mammals have revealed that the cyanobacterial toxin MC-LR suppresses immune functions. Nevertheless, immunotoxic effects of microcystins have been little studied in fish. In this paper, we present the profiles of the immune modulation of MC-LR in grass carp, and quantitative real-time PCR methodology was developed for the measurement of relative transcription changes of six immune-related genes in the spleen and head kidney of the grass carp Ctenopharyngodon idella, which were intraperitoneally injected with 50 μg MC-LR·kg-1 body weight in a three-week period. This study was focused exclusively on gene transcription level changes at different time points after MC-LR exposure, so, only one dose was given. The investigated genes were interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), type I interferon (Type I IFN), peptidoglycan recognition protein-L (PGRP-L), immunoglobulin M (IgM) and major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) genes. The results demonstrated that the transcription levels of the TNF-α, type I IFN, and PGRP-L genes in the spleen and head kidney were significantly low at all time points, and those of IL-1β were significantly low in the head kidney at different time points. In addition, IgM and MHC-I transcription levels were only significantly low in the spleen and head kidney at 21 d postinjection. The changes in the transcription levels of immune-related genes induced by MC-LR confirmed its effect on inhibiting immune function at the transcription level.
KeywordsGrass carp Immune-relate genes Microcystin-LR Immunotoxicity Quantitative real-time PCR
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project no. 20577065).
- Fischer WJ, Hitzfeld BC, Tencalla F, Eriksson JE, Mikhailov A, Dietrich DR (2000) Microcystin-LR toxicodynamics, induced pathology, and immunhistochemical location in livers of blue-green algae exposed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Toxicol Sci 54:365–372. doi:10.1093/toxsci/54.2.365 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Malbrouck C, Trausch G, Devos P, Kestemont P (2003) Hepatic accumulation and effects of microcytin-LR on juvenile goldfish Carassius auratus L. Comp Biochem Physiol C Comp Pharmacol 135:39–48Google Scholar
- Matsushima R, Yoshizawa S, Watanabe MF, Harada K, Furusawa M, Carmichael WW, Fujiki H (1990) In vitro and in vivo effects of protein phosphatase inhibitors, microcystins and nodularin, on mouse skin and fibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 171:867–874. doi:10.1016/0006-291X(90)91226-I PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McBeath AJA, Snow M, Secombes CJ, Ellis AE, Collet B (2007) Expression kinetics of interferon and interferon-induced genes in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) following infection with infectious pancreatic necrosis virus and infectious salmon anaemia virus. Fish Shellfish Immunol 22:230–241. doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2006.05.004 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Purcell MK, Kurath G, Garver K, Herwig RP, Winton JR (2004) Quantitative expression profiling of immune response genes in rainbow trout following infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) infection or DNA vaccination. Fish Shellfish Immunol 17:447–462. doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2004.04.017 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rao PVL, Bhattacharya R, Pant SC, Bhaskar AS (1995) Toxicity evaluation of in vitro cultures of freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa: I. Hepatotoxic and histopathological effects in rats. Biomed Environ Sci 8:254–264Google Scholar
- Sueoka E, Sueoka N, Okabe S, Kozu T, Komori A, Ohta T, Suganuma M, Kim SJ, Lim IK, Fujiki H (1997) Expression of the tumor necrosis factor alpha gene and early response genes by nodularin, a liver tumor promoter, in primary cultured rat hepatocytes. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 123:413–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zapata AG, Chiba A, Varas A (1996) Cells and tissues of the immune system of fish. In: Iwama G, Nakanishi T (eds) The fish immune system. Academic, San Deigo, pp 1–53Google Scholar