Deep-sea fishes in Canada’s Atlantic: population declines and predicted recovery times

  • Krista D. BakerEmail author
  • Jennifer A. Devine
  • Richard L. Haedrich


Because of their slow growth rates, late maturity, low fecundity and long potential lifespans, deep-sea fishes are vulnerable to and theoretically slow to recover from overexploitation and bycatch. As industrial fishing moved into the deep sea, population declines were predicted and five species were shown to meet The World Conservation Union (IUCN) criteria for endangered species in Atlantic Canadian waters and two other deep-living species were listed as threatened by the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. We used data from scientific surveys to determine population trends in a 17-year time series for an additional 32 deep-sea fishes from the same geographic region. Eight species exhibited significant population declines, five increased, two were data deficient, and 17 showed no significant trends. Thus approximately 38% of the deep-sea bottom-living fishes in that well-investigated region could be at-risk, but definitive assignment to an IUCN category for most species is hampered by a lack of basic biological information, especially species specific generation times. Lack of biological information also limits efforts to determine possible recovery times, especially with respect to calculating intrinsic rates of population growth (r). For two Atlantic grenadiers (where r could be estimated using life-history parameters and standard life table techniques), the time to recovery with no fishing mortality could range from over a decade to over a century. This broad range results from the general uncertainty on life-history characteristics of these deep-sea species. Given the documented declines, the lack of basic data on life-history parameters, and the conservative assumption that recovery rates are likely to be prolonged, we argue that it is imperative to conduct additional studies pertaining to life history characteristics of deep-sea fishes and implement conservation measures in the deep sea immediately.


Life history parameters Grenadiers Intrinsic rate of increase Endangered species 



Funding for this work was kindly provided by the Marine Conservation Biology Institute (sustainability of deep-sea fishing research stipend) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank Joe Wroblewski for his ideas concerning estimating time to recovery and Paul Snelgrove and Evan Edinger for their helpful comments on the manuscript.


  1. Able KW, Irion W (1985) Distribution and reproductive seasonality of snailfishes and lumpfishes in the St. Lawrence River estuary and the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Can J Zool 63:1622–1628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alekseyev FY, Alekseyeva YI, Zakharov AN (1992) Vitellogenesis, nature of spawning, fecundity, and gonad maturity stages of the roundnose grenadier, Coryphaenoides rupestris, in the North Atlantic. J Ichthyol 32:32–45Google Scholar
  3. Allain V (2001) Reproductive strategies of three deep-water benthopelagic fishes from the northeast Atlantic Ocean. Fish Res 51:165–176 doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00243-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson JT (1984) Early life history of redfish (Sebastes spp.) on Flemish Cap. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41:1106–1116 doi: 10.1139/f84-130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andriashev AP (1986) Zoarcidae. In: Whitehead PJP, Bauchot ML, Hureau JC et al (eds) Fishes of the Northeastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergstad OA (1990) Distribution, population structure, growth and reproduction of the roundnose grenadier Coryphaenoides rupestris (Pisces: Macrouridae) in the deep waters of the Skagerrak. Mar Biol (Berl) 107:25–39 doi: 10.1007/BF01313239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown SK, Mahon R, Zwanenberg KCT et al (1996) East coast of North America demersal fishes: initial explorations of biogeography and species assemblages. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Dartmouth, NSGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark MR, Anderson OF, Francis RIC et al (2000) The effects of commercial exploitation on orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) from the continental slope of the Chatham Rise, New Zealand, from 1979 to 1997. Fish Res 45:217–238 doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(99)00121-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coggan RA, Gordon JDM, Merret NR (1998) Abundance, distribution, reproduction and diet of notacanthid fishes from the north-east Atlantic. J Fish Biol 52:1038–1057 doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00602.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. COSEWIC (2001) COSEWIC assessment and status report on the northern wolffish Anarhichas denticulatus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  11. COSEWIC (2003) COSEWIC assessment and status report on the cusk Brosme brosme in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  12. COSEWIC (2007) Canadian species at risk, May 2007. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  13. COSEWIC (2008) Canadian species at risk, December 2008. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  14. Crabtree RE, Sulak KJ, Musick JA (1985) Biology and distribution of species of Polyacanthonotus (Pisces: Notacanthiformes) in the western North Atlantic. Bull Mar Sci 36:235–248Google Scholar
  15. Cushing DH (1974) The possible density-dependence of larval mortality and adult mortality in fishes. In: Blaxter JHS (ed) The early life history of fish. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  16. Denney NH, Jennings S, Reynolds JD (2002) Life-history correlates of maximum population growth rates in marine fishes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:2229–2237 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devine JA, Baker KD, Haedrich RL (2006) Deep-sea fishes qualify as endangered. Nature 429:29 doi: 10.1038/439029a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drazen JC (2002) Energy budgets and feeding rates of Coryphaenoides acrolipis and C. armatus. Mar Biol (Berl) 140:677–686 doi: 10.1007/s00227-001-0747-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Drazen JC (2008) Energetics of grenadier fishes. In: Orlov AM, Iwamoto T (eds) Grenadiers of the World Oceans: Biology, stock assessment, and fisheries. American Fisheries Society, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  20. Frisk MG, Miller TJ, Fogarty MJ (2002) The population dynamics of little skate Leucoraja erinacea, winter skate Leucoraja ocellata, and barndoor skate Dipturus laevis: predicting exploitation limits using matrix analysis. ICES J Mar Sci 59:576–586 doi: 10.1006/jmsc.2002.1177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Froese R, Pauly D (2007) Fishbase. Cited 01 October 2007
  22. Gordon JDM (2004) Biology of deep sea fishes. Paper presented at the deep sea fisheries symposium, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Woods Hole, MA, 12-14 September 2004Google Scholar
  23. Gordon JDM, Mauchline J (1996) The distribution and diet of the dominant, slope-dwelling eel, Synaphobranchus kaupi, of the Rockall Trough. J Mar Biol Assoc U K 76:493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gordon JDM, Merrett NR, Haedrich RL (1995) Environmental and biological aspects of slope-dwelling fishes. In: Hopper AG (ed) Deep water fisheries of the north atlantic oceanic slope. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  25. Gusev EV, Shevelev MS (1997) New data on the individual fecundity of the wolffishes of the genus Anarhichas in the Barents Sea. J Ichthyol 37:381–388Google Scholar
  26. Haedrich RL, Merrett NR (1988) Summary atlas of deep-living demersal fishes in the North Atlantic Basin. J Nat Hist 22:1325–1362 doi: 10.1080/00222938800770811 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haedrich RL, Merrett NR, O’Dea NR (2001) Can ecological knowledge catch up with deep-water fishing? A North Atlantic perspective. Fish Res 51:113–122 doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00239-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hilborn R, Walters CJ (1992) Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics and Uncertainty. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoenig JM (1983) Empirical use of longevity data to estimate mortality rates. Fish Bull (Wash D C) 82:898–903Google Scholar
  30. Husebø A, Nøttestad L, Fosså JH et al (2002) Distribution and abundance of fish in deep-sea coral habitats. Hydrobiologia 471:91–99 doi: 10.1023/A:1016549203368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. IUCN (2001) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 3.1. IUCN, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Jensen AL (1996) Beverton and Holt life history invariants result from optimal trade-off of reproduction and survival. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:820–822 doi: 10.1139/cjfas-53-4-820 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelly CJ, Connolly PL, Bracken JJ (1997) Age estimation, growth, maturity and distribution of the roundnose grenadier from the Rockall Trough. J Fish Biol 50:1–17 doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01336.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klein-MacPhee G (2002) Silver hakes. Family Merlucciddae. In: Collette BB, Klien-MacPhee G (eds) Bigelow and Schroeder’s Fishes of the Gulf of Maine. Smithsonian Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. Koslow JA, Boehlert GW, Gordon JDM et al (2000) Continental slope and deep-seas fisheries: Implications for a fragile ecosystem. ICES J Mar Sci 57:548–557 doi: 10.1006/jmsc.2000.0722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koslow JA, Gowlett-Holmes K, Lowry J et al (2001) The seamount benthic macrofauna off southern Tasmania: community structure and impacts of trawling. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 213:111–125 doi: 10.3354/meps213111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krohne DT (2001) Instructor’s Edition: General Ecology. Brooks/Cole, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  38. Magnusson JV (2001) Distribution and some other biological parameters of two morid species Lepidion eques (Gunther, 1887) and Antimora rostrata (Gunther, 1878) in Icelandic waters. Fish Res 51:267–281 doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00251-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merrett NR, Haedrich RL (1997) Deep-Sea Demersal Fish and Fisheries. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Morato T, Watson R, Pitcher TJ et al (2006) Fishing down the deep. Fish 7:24–34 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2006.00205.x Google Scholar
  41. Moss AL (2002) Change in abundance and extent of occurrence of demersal marine fishes: quantitative assessments based on research survey data. Dissertation, Memorial UniversityGoogle Scholar
  42. Murua H (2003) Population structure, growth and reproduction of roughhead grenadier on the Flemish Cap and Flemish Pass. J Fish Biol 63:356–373 doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00158.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Murua H, Motos L (2000) Reproductive biology of roughhead grenadier (Macrourus berglax Lacepède, 1801) (Pisces, Macrouridae), in Northwest Atlantic waters. Sarsia 85:393–402Google Scholar
  44. Nash RDM (1986) Aspecies of the general biology of Vahl’s eelpout, Lycodes vahlii gracilis M. Sars, 1867 (Pisces, Zoarcidae), in Oslofjorden, Norway. Sarsia 71:289–296Google Scholar
  45. Nash RDM, Geffen AJ (2005) Aspects of the general biology of Sars’ eelpout, Lycenchelys sarsi (Collett, 1871) (Pisces, Zoarcidae), in Oslofjorden, Norway. Mar Biol Res 1:33–38 doi: 10.1080/17451000510018926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Piñeiro CG, Bañón MCR (2001) The deep-water fisheries exploited by Spanish fleets in the Northeast Atlantic: a review of the current status. Fish Res 51:311–320 doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00254-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Dea NR, Haedrich RL (2001) COSEWIC status report on the spotted wolffish Anarhichas minor in Canada. In: COSEWIC Assessment and status report on the spotted wolffish Anarhichas minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  48. O’Dea NR, Haedrich RL (2003) A review of the status of the Atlantic Wolffish, Anarhichas lupus, in Canada. Can Field Nat 116:423–433Google Scholar
  49. Oldham WS (1972) Biology of Scotian Shelf cusk, Brosme brosme. ICNAF Res Bull 9:85–98Google Scholar
  50. Roberts CM (2002) Deep impact: the rising toll of fishing in the deep sea. Trends Ecol Evol 17:242–245 doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02492-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rose GA (2004) Reconciling overfishing and climate change with stock dynamics of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) over 500 years. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:1553–1557 doi: 10.1139/f04-173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Safina C, Rosenberg AA, Myers RA et al (2005) U.S. ocean fish recovery: staying the course. Science 309:707–708 doi: 10.1126/science.1113725 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schaefer MB (1954) Some aspects of the dynamics of populations important to the management of commercial marine fishes. Bull. Inter-Tropical Tuna Comm 1:27–56Google Scholar
  54. Simpfendorfer CA (2000) Predicting population recovery rates for endangered western Atlantic sawfishes using demographic analysis. Environ Biol Fishes 58:371–377 doi: 10.1023/A:1007675111597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Watling L, Norse EA (1998) Disturbance of the seabed by mobile fishing gear: a comparison to forest clear-cutting. Conserv Biol 12:1180–1197 doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.0120061180.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krista D. Baker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jennifer A. Devine
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard L. Haedrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentMemorial UniversityNewfoundlandCanada
  2. 2.Middle Depth Fisheries & AcousticsNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research LtdKilbirnieNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations