Competition for territories does not explain allopaternal care in the tessellated darter
- 72 Downloads
Extensive research has focused on understanding the evolution of parental care, with fishes providing important model systems for understanding patterns of variation within and between species. Classic theory predicts that individuals will care for offspring when the fitness benefits through increased offspring survival and growth outweigh the cost to the parents through decreased future reproductive opportunities. Yet, a puzzling observation not explained by this basic theory is the fact that in some species individuals defend and provision unrelated offspring and thus exhibit alloparental care. The tessellated darter, Etheostoma olmstedi, represents one of the first known examples of allopaternal care in fishes. In this species, males often clean and guard eggs fertilized but deserted by other males. Allopaternal care has been argued to occur in the tessellated darter because of competition for a limited number of mating sites where less dominant males accept territories with eggs when other breeding sites are not available. Here, we test this hypothesis using male territory choice experiments. When allowed to choose between two otherwise identical territories either containing eggs fertilized by another male or with no eggs, males spent significantly more time at territories with eggs. This demonstrates that competition for mating territories is not the primary factor explaining the existence of allopaternal care in the tessellated darter. Instead, males of this species may exhibit allopaternal care to dilute predator pressure on their own eggs or because females prefer to mate with males whose territories contain eggs.
KeywordsParental care Etheostoma olmstedi Reproductive strategies Male competition Animal behavior Sexual selection Alloparental care
We thank Joanne Klein for help collecting and maintaining the fish in captivity. We thank Mark Fisher, Erem Kazancioglu, Natasha Kelly, Holly Kindsvater and Stephen Stearns for advice and comments. We also thank two anonymous reviewers and Editor Noakes for helpful comments that improved the manuscript. Funding was provided by Yale University, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Undergraduate Research Fellowship to MBF and NSF Grant IOB-0450807 to SHA.
- Constanz GD (1979) Social dynamics and parental care in the tessellated darter. Proc Acad Natl Sci Philadelphia 131:131–138Google Scholar
- Gross MR, Sargent RC (1985) The evolution of male and female parental care in fishes. Am Zool 25:807–822Google Scholar
- Knouft JH, Page LM (2004) Nest defense against predators by the male fringed darter (Etheostoma crossopterum). Copeia:915–918Google Scholar
- Page LM (1983) Handbook of darters. TFH, Neptune City, p 271Google Scholar
- Page LM, Schemske DW (1978) The effect of interspecific competition on the distribution and size of darters of the subgenus Catonotus (Percidae: Etheostoma). Copeia:406–412Google Scholar
- Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, pp 136–179Google Scholar