Trophic relationships of nonnative brown trout, Salmo trutta, and native Bonneville cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus clarkii utah, in a northern Utah, USA river

  • Peter McHugh
  • Phaedra Budy
  • Gary Thiede
  • Erin VanDyke
Original Paper

Abstract

Nonnative trout invasions have caused the widespread decline of cutthroat trout populations in western North America. In contrast to other nonnative salmonids, the role of nonnative brown trout in native cutthroat trout decline is poorly understood. Specifically, the level of ecological similarity that occurs between these species and the importance of other trophic mechanisms (e.g., predation) in their interactions are key uncertainties. We evaluated the trophic relationships of brown trout and cutthroat trout in a northern Utah river using a combination of diet and stable isotope analyses. We compared the dietary habits of these two species using multiple and complementary measures. Based on both stomach contents and δ13C signatures, we found that these species consumed a similar and opportunistic diet (i.e., they were nonselective in their foraging patterns). However, at most sizes, brown trout ingested larger prey—including fishes—and occupied a higher relative trophic position (i.e., δ15N) than cutthroat trout. Overall, these results demonstrate a high degree of dietary similarity and therefore strengthen earlier conclusions regarding interspecific competition between these two species. Our study, when considered alongside the work of others, suggests there is potential for predatory interactions between these species (i.e., brown trout preying on small cutthroat trout). We believe that future research on brown trout–cutthroat trout interactions should consider predatory effects in greater detail.

Keywords

Nonnative species Cutthroat trout Brown trout Competition Predation 

References

  1. Allen JD, Russek E (1985) The quantification of stream drift. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:184–192Google Scholar
  2. Bachman RA (1984) Foraging behavior of free-ranging wild and hatchery brown trout in a stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 113:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter CV, Fausch KD, Murakami M, Chapman PL (2004) Fish invasion restructures stream and forest food webs by interrupting reciprocal prey subsidies. Ecology 85:2656–2663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaudoin CP, Tonn WM, Prepas EE, Wassenaar LI (1999) Individual specialization and trophic adaptability of northern pike (Esox lucius): an isotope and dietary analysis. Oecologia 120:386–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birch LC (1957) The meanings of competition. Am Nat 91:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Budy P, McHugh P, Thiede GP (2004) Logan River whirling disease study: factors affecting trout population dynamics, abundance, and distribution in the Logan River, Utah. Annual Report to Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Utah Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Logan, 61 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Budy P, Thiede G, McHugh P (in press) A quantification of the vital rates, abundance, and status of a critical population of endemic cutthroat trout. N Am J Fish ManagGoogle Scholar
  8. Cartwright MA, Beauchamp DA, Bryant MD (1998) Quantifying cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) predation on sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) fry using a bioenergetics approach. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1285–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cortés E (1997) A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: application to elasmobranch fishes. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:726–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunham JB, Rahn ME, Schroeter RE, Breck SW (2000) Diets of sympatric Lahontan cutthroat trout and nonnative brook trout: implications for species interactions. West N Am Nat 60:304–310Google Scholar
  11. Dunham J, Adams SB, Schroeter R, Novinger D (2002) Alien invasions in aquatic ecosystems: toward an understanding of brook trout invasions and their potential impacts on inland cutthroat trout in western North America. Rev Fish Biol Fish 12:373–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fausch KD (1988) Tests of competition between native and introduced salmonids in streams: what have we learned? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:2238–2246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fausch KD (1989) Do gradient and temperature affect distribution of, and interactions between juvenile brook char and other salmonids in streams? Physiol Ecol Jpn 1(Spec Vol):303–322Google Scholar
  14. Fausch K (1998) Interspecific competition and juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): on testing effects and evaluating evidence across scales. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55(Suppl. 1):218–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fausch KD, Nakano S, Kitano S (1997) Experimentally induced foraging mode shift by sympatric charrs in a Japanese mountain stream. Behav Ecol 8:414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuller PL, Nico LG, Williams JD (1999) Nonindigenous fishes introduced into inland waters of the United States. American Fisheries Society, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffith JS (1974) Utilization of invertebrate drift by brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki) in small streams in Idaho. Trans Am Fish Soc 103:440–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffith JS (1988) Review of competition between cutthroat trout and other salmonids. Am Fish Soc Symp 4:134–140Google Scholar
  19. Hilderbrand RH, Kershner JL (2004) Influence of habitat type on food supply, selectivity, and diet overlap of Bonneville cutthroat trout and nonnative brook trout in Beaver Creek, Idaho. N Am J Fish Manag 24:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de la Hoz Franco EA, Budy P (2005) Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the distribution of trout and salmon along a longitudinal stream gradient. Environ Biol Fish 72:379–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kara C, Alp A (2005) Feeding habits and diet composition of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in the upper streams of River Ceyhan and River Euphrates in Turkey. Turk J Vet Sci 29:417–428Google Scholar
  22. Koel TM, Bigelow PE, Doepke PD, Ertel BD, Mahony DL (2005) Nonnative lake trout result in Yellowstone cutthroat trout decline and impacts to bears and anglers. Fisheries 30:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kreivi P, Muotka T, Huusko T, Mäki-Petäys A, Huhta A, Meissner K (1999) Diel feeding periodicity, daily ration, and prey selectivity in juvenile brown trout in a subarctic river. J Fish Biol 55:553–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. L’Abée-Lund JH, Aass P, Saegrov H (2002) Long-term variation in piscivory in a brown trout population: effect of changes in available prey organisms. Ecol Fresh Fish 11:260–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matthews B, Mazumder A (2004) A critical evaluation of intrapopulation variation in δ13C and isotopic evidence of individual specialization. Oecologia 140:361–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mayama H (1999) Predation of juvenile masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masu) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) on newly emerged masu salmon fry in the Chitose River. Bull Natl Salmon Resour Cent 2:21–27Google Scholar
  27. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
  28. McGrath CC (2004) Trophic roles of native greenback cutthroat trout and non-native brook trout in montane streams of Colorado. Dissertation, University of Colorado, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  29. McHugh P, Budy P (2005) An experimental evaluation of competitive and thermal effects on brown trout (Salmo trutta) and Bonneville cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki utah) performance along an altitudinal gradient. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:2784–2795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McHugh P, Budy P (2006) Experimental effects of nonnative brown trout (Salmo trutta) on the individual- and population-level performance of native Bonneville cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii utah). Trans Am Fish Soc 135:1441–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McIntosh AR (2000) Habitat- and size-related variations in exotic trout impacts on native galaxiid fishes in New Zealand streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:2140–2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Metzeling L, Robinson D, Perriss S (2002) Temporal persistence of benthic invertebrate communities in south-eastern Australian streams: taxonomic resolution and implications for the use of predictive models. Mar Freshw Res 53:1223–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Milliken GA, Johnson DE (2000) Analysis of messy data, volume III: analysis of covariance. Chapman and Hall, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  34. Milner AM, Conn SC, Brown LW (2006) Persistence and stability of macroinvertebrate communities in streams of Denali National Park, Alaska: implications for biological monitoring. Freshw Biol 51:373–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mittelbach GG, Persson L (1998) The ontogeny of piscivory and its ecological consequences. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1454–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Museth J, Borgstrøm R, Hame T, Holen LÅ (2003) Predation by brown trout: a major mortality factor for sexually mature European minnows. J Fish Biol 62:692–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakano S, Fausch KD, Kitano S (1999) Flexible niche partitioning via a foraging mode shift: a proposed mechanism for coexistence in stream-dwelling charrs. J Anim Ecol 68:1079–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Novinger DC (2000) Reversals in competitive ability: do cutthroat trout have a thermal refuge from competition with brook trout? Dissertation, University of Wyoming, LaramieGoogle Scholar
  39. Novinger DC, Rahel FJ (2003) Isolation management with artificial barriers as a conservation strategy for cutthroat trout in headwater streams. Conserv Biol 17:772–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Overman NC, Parrish DL (2001) Stable isotope composition of walleye: 15N accumulation with age and area-specific differences in δ13C. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:1253–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Post DM (2002) Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83:703–718Google Scholar
  42. Quist MC, Hubert WA (2004) Bioinvasive species and the preservation of cutthroat trout in the western United States: ecological, social, and economic issues. Environ Sci Policy 7:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Quist MC, Hubert WA (2005) Relative effects of biotic and abiotic processes: a test of the biotic–abiotic constraining hypothesis using cutthroat trout. Trans Am Fish Soc 134:676–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rader RB (1997) A functional classification of the drift: traits that influence invertebrate availability to salmonids. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1211–1234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Richter BD, Braun DP, Mendelson MA, Master LL (1997) Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna. Conserv Biol 11:1081–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Robinson CT, Minshall GW, Royer TV (2000) Inter-annual patterns in macroinvertebrate communities of wilderness streams in Idaho, USA. Hydrobiologia 421:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ruzycki JR, Beauchamp DA, Yule DL (2003) Effects of introduced lake trout on native cutthroat trout in Yellowstone Lake. Ecol Appl 13:23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. SAS Institute (2005) SAS Version 9.01. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  49. Schoener TW (1970) Non-synchronous spatial overlap of lizards in patchy habitats. Ecology 51:408–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Strauss RE (1979) Reliability of estimates for Ivlev’s electivity index, the forage ratio, and a proposed linear index of food selection. Trans Am Fish Soc 108:344–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Townsend CR (2003) Individual, population, community, and ecosystem consequences of a fish invader in New Zealand streams. Conserv Biol 17:38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Townsend CR, Crowl TA (1991) Fragmented population structure in a native New Zealand fish: an effect of introduced brown trout. Oikos 61:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Trueman CN, McGill RAR, Guyard PH (2005) The effect of growth rate on tissue-diet isotopic spacing in rapidly growing animals. An experimental study with Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19:3239–3247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vander Zanden MJ, Cabana G, Rasmussen JB (1997) Comparing trophic position of freshwater fish calculated using stable nitrogen isotope ratios (δ15N) and literature dietary data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1142–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang L, White RJ (1994) Competition between wild brown trout and hatchery greenback cutthroat trout of largely wild parentage. N Am J Fish Manag 14:475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weigel DE, Peterson JT, Spruell P (2003) Introgressive hybridization between native cutthroat trout and introduced rainbow trout. Ecol Appl 13:38–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Woodward G, Jones JI, Hildrew AG (2002) Community persistence in Broadstone Stream (UK) over three decades. Freshw Biol 47:1419–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Young MK (1995) Conservation assessment for inland cutthroat trout. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experimental Station, USDA Forest Service publication RM-GTR-256, Fort Collins, 61 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter McHugh
    • 1
  • Phaedra Budy
    • 1
  • Gary Thiede
    • 1
  • Erin VanDyke
    • 1
  1. 1.USGS Utah Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of AWER, College of Natural ResourcesUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations