Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 77, Issue 3–4, pp 407–421

Morphometric minefields—towards a measurement standard for chondrichthyan fishes

Original paper


Size measurements are crucial for studies on the growth, maturation, maximum size, and population structure of cartilaginous fishes. However, researchers use a variety of measurement techniques even when working on the same species. Accurate comparison of results among studies is only possible if the measurement technique used is adequately defined and, if different techniques are used, a conversion equation can be derived. These conditions have not always been met, leading to invalid comparisons and incorrect conclusions. This paper reviews methods used for measuring chondrichthyans, and summarises the variety of constraints that influence the choice of a measurement technique. Estimates of the variability present in some measurement techniques are derived for shortfin mako shark, Isurus oxyrinchus, porbeagle shark, Lamna nasus, blue shark, Prionace glauca, Antarctic thorny skate, Amblyraja georgiana, and Pacific electric ray, Torpedo californica. Total length measured with the tail in the natural position (sharks) and disc widths (batoids) have higher variability than other methods, and are not recommended. Instead, the longest longitudinal axis should be measured where possible and practical; i.e., flexed total length for sharks, total length for batoids (excluding suborder Myliobatoidei), pelvic length for batoids of the suborder Myliobatoidei, and chimaera length (snout to posterior end of supracaudal fin) for chimaeroids (except for Callorhinchus, for which fork length should be measured from the anterior edge of the snout protuberance). Straight-line measurements are preferred to measurements over the curve of the body. Importantly, measurement methods must be clearly defined, giving information on the anterior reference point, the posterior reference point, and how the measurement was made between these two. Measurements using at least two different methods are recommended on at least a subsample of the fish in order to develop conversion regression relationships.


Measurement Chondrichthyans Sharks Rays Skates Chimaeras 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bass AJ (1973) Analysis and description of variation in the proportional dimensions of scyliorhinid, carcharhinid and sphyrnid sharks. Oceanographic Research Institute Investigational Report 32, 28 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass AJ, D’Aubrey JD, Kistnasamy N (1975) Sharks of the east coast of southern Africa. IV. The families Odontaspididae, Scapanorhynchidae, Isuridae, Cetorhinidae, Alopiidae, Orectolobidae and Rhiniodontidae. Oceanographic Research Institute Investigational Report 39, 102 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigelow HB, Schroeder WC (1948) Fishes of the Western North Atlantic. Part 1. Lancelets, cyclostomes, sharks. Mem Sears Found Mar Res 1:59–546Google Scholar
  4. Calis E, Jackson EH, Nolan CP, Jeal F (2005) Preliminary age and growth estimates of the rabbitfish, Chimaera monstrosa, with implications for future resource management. J Northw Atl Fish Sci 35:15–26Google Scholar
  5. Campana SE, Marks L, Joyce W (2005) The biology and fishery of shortfin mako sharks (Isurus oxyrinchus) in Atlantic Canadian waters. Fish Res 73:341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casey JG, Pratt HL, Stillwell CE (1985) Age and growth of the sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus) from the western North Atlantic. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:963–975Google Scholar
  7. Chan RWK (2001) Biological studies on sharks caught off the coast of New South Wales. PhD Thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 323 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Cliff G, Dudley SFJ (1992) Sharks caught in the protective gill nets off Natal, South Africa. 6. The copper shark Carcharhinus brachyurus (Günther). S Afr J Mar Sci 12:663–674Google Scholar
  9. Cliff G., Dudley SFJ, Davis B (1990) Sharks caught in the protective gill nets off Natal, South Africa. 3. The shortfin mako shark Isurus oxyrinchus (Rafinesque). S␣Afr J Mar Sci 9:115–126Google Scholar
  10. Coakley A (1973) A study in the conservation of elephant fish (Callorynchus milii, Bory) in New Zealand. New Zealand Marine Department Fisheries Technical Report 126, 22 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Compagno L, Dando M, Fowler S (2005) Sharks of the world. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 368 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. Compagno LJV (1984) Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. FAO Fish Synop 125(4):655Google Scholar
  13. Di Giácomo EE, Perier MR (1994) Reproductive biology of the cockfish, Callorhynchus callorhynchus (Holocephali: Callorhynchidae), in Patagonian waters (Argentina). Fish Bull 92:531–539Google Scholar
  14. Didier DA (1995) Phylogenetic systematics of extant chimaeroid fishes (Holocephali, Chimaeroidei). American Museum Novitates (3119), 86 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Didier DA (2002) Two new species of chimaeroid fishes from the southwestern Pacific Ocean (Holocephali, Chimaeridae). Ichthyol Res 49:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duffy C, Francis MP (2001) Evidence of summer parturition in shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) sharks from New Zealand waters. N Z J Mar Freshw Res 35:319–324Google Scholar
  17. Francis MP (1997) Spatial and temporal variation in the growth rate of elephantfish (Callorhinchus milii). N Z J Mar Freshw Res 31:9–23Google Scholar
  18. Francis MP, Francis RICC (1992) Growth rate estimates for New Zealand rig (Mustelus lenticulatus). Aust J Mar Freshw Res 43:1157–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Francis MP, Ó Maolagáin C, Stevens D (2001) Age, growth, maturity, and mortality of rough and smooth skates (Dipturus nasutus and D. innominatus). New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2001/17, 21 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Francis MP, Stevens JD (2000) Reproduction, embryonic development and growth of the porbeagle shark, Lamna nasus, in the south-west Pacific Ocean. Fish Bull 98:41–63Google Scholar
  21. Freer DWL, Griffiths CL (1993) Estimation of age and growth in the St Joseph Callorhinchus capensis (Dumeril). S Afr J Mar Sci 13:75–81Google Scholar
  22. Gilmore RG, Dodrill JW, Linley PA (1983) Reproduction and embryonic development of the sand tiger shark, Odontaspis taurus (Rafinesque). Fish Bull 81:201–225Google Scholar
  23. Gould SJ (1966) Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 41:587–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hubbs CL, Ishiyama R (1968) Methods for the taxonomic study and description of skates (Rajidae). Copeia 1968:483–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ishiyama R (1951) Studies on the rays and skates belonging to the family Rajidae, found in Japan and adjacent regions. 2. On the age-determination of Japanese black-skate Raja fusca Garman (preliminary report). Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 16:112–118Google Scholar
  26. Johnson AG, Horton HF (1972) Length-weight relationship, food habits, parasites, and sex and age determination of the ratfish, Hydrolagus colliei (Lay and Bennett). Fish Bull 70:421–429Google Scholar
  27. Joung S-J, Hsu H-H (2005) Reproduction and embryonic development of the shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus Rafinesque, 1810, in the northwestern Pacific. Zool Stud 44:487–496Google Scholar
  28. Kohler NE, Casey JG, Turner PA (1995) Length-weight relationships for 13 species of sharks from the western North Atlantic. Fish Bull 93:412–418Google Scholar
  29. Last PR, Stevens JD (1994) Sharks and rays of Australia. CSIRO, Hobart, 513 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Luchetti E (2004) Aspects de la biologie de Chimaera monstrosa L. (Holocephali: Chimaeridae) en Atlantique Nord-Est. J Rech Oceanogr 29:40Google Scholar
  31. MacNeil M.A, Campana SE (2002) Comparison of whole and sectioned vertebrae for determining the age of young blue shark (Prionace glauca). J Northw Atl Fish Sci 30:77–82Google Scholar
  32. McArdle BH (1988) The structural relationship: regression in biology. Can J Zool 66:2329–2339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mollet HF, Cailliet GM (1996) Using allometry to predict body mass from linear measurements of the white shark. In: Klimley AP, Ainley DG (eds) Great white sharks. The biology of Carcharodon carcharias. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 81–89Google Scholar
  34. Moura T, Figueiredo I, Machado PB, Gordo LS (2004) Growth pattern and reproductive strategy of the holocephalan Chimaera monstrosa along the Portuguese continental slope. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 84:801–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Natanson LJ, (1993) Effect of temperature on band deposition in the little skate, Raja erinacea. Copeia 1993:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Natanson LJ, Casey JG, Kohler NE, Colket T (1999) Growth of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, in the western North Atlantic based on tag returns and length frequencies; and a note on the effects of tagging. Fish Bull 97:944–953Google Scholar
  37. Notarbartolo-di-Sciara G (1987) A revisionary study of the genus Mobula Rafinesque, 1810 (Chondrichthyes: Mobulidae) with the description of a new species. Zool J Linn Soc 91:1–91Google Scholar
  38. Pratt HL (1979) Reproduction in the blue shark, Prionace glauca. Fish Bull 77:445–470Google Scholar
  39. Ricker WE (1973) Linear regressions in fishery research. J Fish Res Board Can 30:409–434Google Scholar
  40. Skomal GB, Natanson LJ (2003) Age and growth of the blue shark (Prionace glauca) in the North Atlantic Ocean. Fish Bull 101:627–639Google Scholar
  41. Sullivan KJ (1977) Age and growth of the elephant fish Callorhinchus milii (Elasmobranchii: Callorhynchidae). N Z J Mar Freshw Res 11:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Inshore and Pelagic FishesNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research LtdWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations