Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 76, Issue 2–4, pp 303–315

Ontogeny of feeding in two native and one alien fish species from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia

  • Zeb D. Tonkin
  • Paul Humphries
  • Peter A. Pridmore
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Investigations into the feeding of the early stages of fishes can provide insights into processes influencing recruitment. In this study, we examined ontogenetic changes in morphology and feeding behaviour of two native Australian freshwater species, Murray cod, Maccullochella peelii peelii, and golden perch, Macquaria ambigua, and the alien species, common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Murray cod free embryos are large and well developed at the onset of feeding, whereas the other two species begin exogenous feeding much younger and are smaller and less-developed. Carp commence exogenous feeding 3 days earlier than golden perch, and show more advanced development of the eyes and ingestive apparatus. We conducted feeding experiments, presenting larvae of the three species with a standardised prey mix (comprising equal numbers of small calanoid copepods, large calanoid copepods, small Daphnia, and large Daphnia). Larvae of most tested ages and species showed a preference for mid-sized prey (300–500 µm wide). This was true even when their gapes substantially exceeded the largest prey offered. Daphnia were consumed more than similar-sized copepods. The results of this study suggest that survival through their larval period will be threatened in all three species if catchable prey <500 µm in width are not available throughout such time. They also suggest that interspecific competition for prey may occur, especially when larvae are very young. The precocious development of structures involved in feeding and the extended transition from endogenous to exogenous feeding of early carp larvae are likely to have contributed to the success of this species since its introduction to Australia.

Keywords

Larval development Prey preference Recruitment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander RM (1967) Functional design in fishes. Hutchinson & Co. Ltd, London, 160 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Appelbaum S, Schemmel C (1983) Demersal sense organs and their significance in the feeding behaviour of the common sole Solea vulgaris. Marine Ecol Progr Ser 13:29–36Google Scholar
  3. Arumugam PT, Geddes MC (1987) Feeding and growth of golden perch larvae and fry (Macquaria ambigua). Trans Roy Soc South Aust 111:59–65Google Scholar
  4. Arumugam PT, Geddes MC (1992) Selectivity of microcrustacean zooplankton by golden perch (Macquaria ambigua) larvae and fry in laboratory studies. Trans Roy Soc South Aust 116:29–32Google Scholar
  5. Balon EK (1999) Alternative ways to become a juvenile or a definitive phenotype (and on some persisting linguistic offenses). Environ Biol Fishes 56:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bremigan MT, Stein RA (1994) Gape-dependent larval foraging and zooplankton size: implications for fish recruitment across systems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 51:913–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chick JH, Van Den Avyle MJ (2000) Effects of feeding ration on larval swimming speed and responsiveness to predator attacks: implications for cohort survival. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cushing DH (1990) Plankton production and year class strength in fish populations: an update of the match/mismatch hypothesis. Adv Marine Biol 26:249–293Google Scholar
  9. Drost MR, Van Den Boogaart JGM (1986) The energetics of feeding strikes in larval carp, Cyprinus carpio. J␣Fish Biol 29:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drost MR, Muller M, Osse JWM (1988) A quantitative hydrodynamical model of suction feeding in larval fishes: the role of frictional forces. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 234:263–281ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernald RD (1985) Growth of the teleost eye: novel solutions to complex constraints. Environ Biol Fish 13:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frank KT, Leggett WT (1982) Environmental regulation of growth rate, efficiency, and swimming performance in larval capelin (Mallotus villosus) and its application to the match/mismatch hypothesis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:691–699Google Scholar
  13. Frank KT, Leggett WT (1986) Effect of prey abundance and size on the growth and survival of larval fish: an experimental study employing large volume enclosures. Marine Ecol Progr Ser 34:11–22Google Scholar
  14. Fuiman LA, Higgs DM (1997) Ontogeny, growth and the recruitment process. In: Chambers RC, Trippel EA (eds) Early life history and recruitment in fish populations. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 225–249Google Scholar
  15. Furnass TI (1979) Laboratory experiments on prey selection by perch fry (Perca fluviatilis). Freshwater Biol 9:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gehrke PC (1991) Avoidance of inundated floodplain habitat by larvae of golden perch (Macquaria ambigua Richardson): influence of water quality or food distribution? Aust J Marine Freshwater Res 42:707–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gehrke PC (1992) Diel abundance, migration and feeding of fish larvae (Eleotridae) in a floodplain billabong. J␣Fish Biol 40:695–707MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. González-Quirós R, Anadón R (2001) Diet breadth variability in larval blue whiting as a response to plankton size structure. J Fish Biol 59:1111–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hildebrand M (1968). Anatomical preparations. University of California Press, Berkley, CA, USA, 100 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. Humphries P, Lake PS (2000) Fish larvae and the management of regulated rivers. Regulat Rivers 16:421–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Humphries P, King AJ, Koehn JD (1999) Fish, flows and floodplains: links between freshwater fishes and their environment in the Murray-Darling River system, Australia. Environ Biol Fish 56:129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Humphries P, Serafini LG, King A (2002) River regulation and fish larvae: variation through space and time. Freshwater Biol 47:1307–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keenan C, Watts R, Serafini L (1995) Population genetics of golden perch, silver perch and eel-tailed catfish within the Murray-Darling Basin. Murray Darling Basin Commission, 1995 Riverine Environment Research Forum, pp 17–26Google Scholar
  24. King, AJ (2002) Recruitment ecology of fish in floodplain rivers of the Southern Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Ph.D. thesis. Monash University, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  25. Koehn J (1995) Habitats and movements of freshwater fish in the Murray-Darling Basin. Murray Darling Basin Commission, 1995. Riverine Environment Research Forum, pp 27–32Google Scholar
  26. Krebs CJ (1989) Ecological methodology. HarperCollins Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 654 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Krebs JM, Turingan RG (2003) Intraspecific variation in Gape–prey size relationships and feeding success during early ontogeny in red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus. Environ Biol Fish 66:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Livingston ME (1987) Morphological and sensory specialization of five New Zealand flatfish species, in relation to feeding behaviour. J Fish Biol 31:775–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luczkovich JL, Norton SF, Gilmore RG (1995) The influence of oral anatomy on prey selection during the ontogeny of two percoid fishes, Langodon rhomboides and Centropomus undecimalis. Environ Biol Fish 44:79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mallen-Cooper M, Stuart I, Hides-Pearson F, Harris J (1995) Fish migration in the River Murray and assessment of the Torrumbarry fishway. Murray Darling Basin Commission, 1995. Riverine Environment Research Forum, pp 33–37Google Scholar
  31. Mayer CM, Wahl DH (1997) The relationship between prey selectivity and growth and survival in a larval fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1504–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCormick MI (1998) Ontogeny of diet shift by a macrocarnivorous fish, Cheilodactylus spectabilis: relationship between feeding mechanics, microhabitat selection and growth. Marine Biol 132:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McLaren IA, Avendaño P (1995) Prey field and diet of larval cod on Western Bank, Scotian Shelf. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 52:448–463Google Scholar
  34. Mehner T, Plewa M, Hulsmann S, Worischka S (1998) Gape-size dependent feeding of age-0 perch (Perca fluviatilis) and age-0 zander (Stizostedion lucioperca) on Daphnia galeata. Arch Hydrobiol 142: 191–207Google Scholar
  35. Mills EL, Confer JL, Kretchmer DW (1986) Zooplankton selection by young yellow perch: the influence of light, prey density, and predator size. Trans Am Fish Soc 115:716–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Munk P (1992) Foraging behaviour and prey size spectra of larval herring Clupea harengus. Marine Ecol Progr Ser 80:149–158Google Scholar
  37. Osse JWM (1990) Form changes in fish larvae in relation to changing demands of function. Netherlands J Zool 40:362–385Google Scholar
  38. Pankhurst PM, Montgomery JC, Pankhurst NW (1991) Growth, development and behaviour of artificially reared larval Pagrus auratus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801) (Sparidae). Aust J Marine Freshwater Res 42:391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roberts J, Ebner B (1996) The issue of carp in Australia. Murray Darling Basin Commission, 1996. Riverine Environment Research Forum, pp 7–12Google Scholar
  40. Rowland SJ (1992) Diet and feeding of Murray Cod (Maccullachella peelii) larvae. Proc Linn Soc NSW 113:193–201Google Scholar
  41. Rowland SJ (1996) Development of techniques for the large-scale rearing of the larvae of the Australian freshwater fish golden perch, Macquaria ambigua (Richardson, 1845). Marine Freshwater Res 47:233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanchez-Velasco L, (1998) Diet composition and feeding habits of fish larvae of two co-occurring species (Pisces: Callionymidae and Bothidae) in the North-western Mediterranean. ICES J Marine Sci 55:299–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schael DM, Rudstam LG, Post JR (1991) Gape limitation and prey selection in larval yellow perch (Perca flavescens), freshwater drum (Aplodinotus grunniens), and black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus). Can J␣Fish Aquat Sci 48:1919–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Serafini LG, Humphries P (2004) Preliminary guide to the identification of larvae of fish, with a bibliography of␣their studies, from the Murray-Darling Basin. Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater Ecology. Identification & Ecology Guide No. 48. Albury and Clayton, Vic., AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  45. Sivakumaran KP, Brown P, Stoessel D, Giles A (2003) Maturation and reproductive biology of female wild carp, Cyprinus carpio, in Victoria, Australia. Environ Biol Fish 68:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith BB, Walker KF (2004) Spawning dynamics of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) in the River Murray, South Australia, shown by macroscopic and histological staging of gonads. J Fish Biol 64:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vilizzi L (1998) Observations on ontogenetic shifts in the diet of 0 + carp, Cyprinus carpio, from the River Murray, Australia. Folia Zool 47:225–229Google Scholar
  48. Wainwright PC (1988) Morphology and ecology: functional basis of feeding constraints in Caribbean labrid fishes. Ecology 69:635–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wainwright PC, Richard BA (1995) Predicting patterns of prey use from morphology of fishes. Environ Biol Fish 44:97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wanzenbock J, Schiemer F (1989) Prey detection in cyprinids during early development. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46:995–1001Google Scholar
  51. Zaunrieter M, Junger H, Kotrschal K (1991) Retinal morphology of cyprinid fishes: a quantitative histological study of ontogenetic changes and interspecific variation. Vision Res 31:383–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zeb D. Tonkin
    • 1
  • Paul Humphries
    • 2
    • 3
  • Peter A. Pridmore
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Management and EcologyLa Trobe UniversityWodongaAustralia
  2. 2.Cooperative Research Centre for Freshwater EcologyMurray-Darling Freshwater Research CentreAlburyAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  4. 4.Freshwater Ecology, Department of Sustainability and EnvironmentArthur Rylah Institute for Environmental ResearchHeidelbergAustralia
  5. 5.The Johnstone CentreSchool of Environmental and Information SciencesAlbaryAustralia

Personalised recommendations