Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 76, Issue 1, pp 101–108 | Cite as

Evoked Potential Audiograms of the Nurse Shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum) and the Yellow Stingray (Urobatis jamaicensis)

Original Paper

Abstract

The hearing thresholds of the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum, and the yellow stingray, Urobatis jamaicensis, were measured using auditory evoked potentials (AEP). Stimuli were calibrated using a pressure-velocity probe so that the acoustic field could be completely characterized. The results show similar hearing thresholds for both species and similar hearing thresholds to previously measured audiograms for the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris, and the horn shark, Heterodontis francisi. All of these audiograms suggest poor hearing abilities, raising questions about field studies showing attraction of sharks to acoustic signals. By extrapolating the particle acceleration thresholds into estimates of their equivalent far-field sound pressure levels, it appears that these sharks cannot likely detect most of the sounds that have attracted sharks in the field.

Key words

Elasmobranch Hearing Audiogram Auditory Evoked Potential Particle acceleration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banner A (1967) Evidence of sensitivity to acoustic displacements in the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris (Poey). In: Cahn PH (ed) Lateral line detectors. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 265–273Google Scholar
  2. Barber VC, Emerson CJ (1980) Scanning electron microscopic observations on the inner ear of the skate, Raja ocellata. Cell Tissue Res 205:199–215Google Scholar
  3. Barber VC, Yake KI, Clark VF, Pungur J (1985) Quantitative analyses of sex and size differences in the macula neglecta and ramus neglectus in the inner ear of the skate, Raja ocellata. Cell Tissue Res 241:597–605Google Scholar
  4. Barry MA (1987) Afferent and efferent connections of the primary octaval nuclei in the clearnose skate, Raja eglanteria. J Comp Neurol 266:457–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bass AH, Clark CW (2003) The physical acoustics of underwater sound communication. In: Simmons AM, Popper AN, Fay RR, (eds) Acoustic communication. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 15–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bass AH, McKibben JR (2003) Neural mechanisms and behaviors for acoustic communication in teleost fish. Prog Neurobiol 69:1–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casper BM, Lobel PS, Yan HY (2003) The hearing sensitivity of the little skate, Raja erinacea: a comparison of two methods. Environ Biol Fishes 68:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corwin JT (1977) Morphology of the macula neglecta in sharks of the genus Carcharhinus. J Morphol 152:341–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corwin JT (1978) The relation of inner ear structure to the feeding behavior in sharks and rays. Scan Electron Micros II:1105–1112Google Scholar
  10. Corwin JT (1981a) Audition in elasmobranchs. In: Tavolga WN, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Hearing and sound communication in fishes. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 81–102Google Scholar
  11. Corwin JT (1981b) Peripheral auditory physiology in the lemon shark: evidence of the parallel otolithic and non-otolithic sound detection. J Compar Physiol 142:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corwin JT (1989) Functional anatomy of the auditory system of sharks and rays. J Exp Zool – Suppl 2:62–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egner SA, Mann DA (2005) Auditory sensitivity of sergeant major damselfish Abudefduf saxatilis from post-settlement juvenitle to adult. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 285:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fay RR (1988) Hearing in vertebrates: a psychophysics databook. Hill-Fay Associates, WinnetkaGoogle Scholar
  15. Fay RR, Edds-Walton PL (1997) Directional response properties of saccular afferents of the toadfish, Opsanus tau. Hearing Res 111:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fay RR, Kendall JI, Popper AN, Tester AL (1974) Vibration detection by the macula neglecta of sharks. Comp Biochem Physiol 47A:1235–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hueter RE, Mann DA, Maruska KP, Sisneros JA, Demski LS (2004) Sensory biology of elasmobranchs. In: Carrier JC, Musick JA, Heithaus MR, (eds) Biology of sharks and their relatives. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 325–368Google Scholar
  18. Kalmijn AD (1988) Hydrodynamic and acoustic field detection. In: Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN (eds) Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 83–130Google Scholar
  19. Kelly JC, Nelson DR (1975) Hearing thresholds of the horn shark, Heterodontus francisci. J Acoust Soc Am 58:905–909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kenyon TN, Ladich F, Yan HY (1998) A comparative study of hearing ability in fishes: the auditory brainstem response approach. J Compar Physiol A 182:307–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kritzler H, Wood L (1961) Provisional audiogram for the shark, Carcharhinus leucas. Science 133:1480–1482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Locascio JV, Mann DA (2005) Effects of hurricane charley on fish chorusing. Biol Lett 1:362–365Google Scholar
  23. Lowenstein O, T.Roberts DM (1951) The localization and analysis of the responses to vibration from the isolated elasmobranch labyrinth. A contribution to the problem of the evolution of hearing in vertebrates. J Physiol 114:471–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lowenstein O, Osborne MP, Wersäll J (1964) Structure and innervation of the sensory epithelia in the thornback ray (Raja clavata). Proce Roy Soc London B 160:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mann DA, Higgs DM, Tavolga WN, Souza MJ, Popper AN (2001) Ultrasound detection by clupeiform fishes. J Acoust Soc Am 109:3048–3054Google Scholar
  26. Myrberg AA Jr (1978) Underwater sound – its effect on the behaviour of sharks. In: Hodgson ES, Mathewson RF, (eds) Sensory biology of sharks, skates and rays. Government USPrinting Office, Washington, DC Google Scholar
  27. Myrberg AA Jr (2001) The acoustical biology of elasmobranchs. Environ Biol Fishes 60:31–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Myrberg AA Jr, Banner A, Richard JD (1969) Shark attraction using a video-acoustic system. Marine Biol 2:264–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Myrberg AA Jr, Ha SJ, Walewski S, Banbury JC (1972) Effectiveness of acoustic signals in attracting epipelagic sharks to an underwater sound source. Bull Marine Sci 22:926–949Google Scholar
  30. Nelson DR (1967) Hearing thresholds, frequency discrimination, and acoustic orientation in the lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris (Poey). Bull Marine Sci 17:741–768Google Scholar
  31. Nelson DR, Gruber SH (1963) Sharks: attraction by low-frequency sounds. Science 142:975–977PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nelson DR, Johnson RH, Waldrop LG (1969) Responses to Bahamian sharks and groupers to low-frequency, pulsed sounds. Bull South Calif Acad Sci 68:131–137Google Scholar
  33. Olla B (1962) The perception of sound in small hammerhead sharks, Sphyrna lewini. Thesis MS, University of HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  34. Popper AN, Fay RR (1977) Structure and function of the elasmobranch auditory system. Am Zool 17:443–452Google Scholar
  35. Richard JD (1968) Fish attracted with low-frequency pulsed sound. J Fish Res Board Can 25:1441–1452Google Scholar
  36. Rogers PH, Cox M (1988) Underwater sounds as a biological stimulus. In: Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN, (eds) Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 131–149Google Scholar
  37. Tester AL, Kendall JI, Milisen WB (1972) Morphology of the ear of the shark genus Carcharhinus, with particular reference to the macula neglecta. Pac Sci 26:264–274Google Scholar
  38. Wisby WJ, Richard JD, Nelson DR, Gruber SH (1964) Sound perception in elasmobranchs. In: Tavolga WN (ed) Marine bio-acoustics. Pergamon Press, New York, pp 255–267Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Marine ScienceUniversity of South FloridaSt. PetersburgUSA

Personalised recommendations