Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 72, Issue 2, pp 123–133 | Cite as

Food and feeding habits of pearly razorfish, Xyrichtys novacula (Linnaeus, 1758), in the southern Tyrrhenian Sea: variation by sex and size

  • Luca Castriota
  • Maria Pia Scarabello
  • Maria Grazia Finoia
  • Mauro Sinopoli
  • Franco Andaloro
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

We collected pearly razorfish, Xyrichtys novacula (Labridae), from a sandy bottom of Capo d’Orlando (Tyrrhenian Sea) to study their feeding habits. We caught fish by hand-lines and seine nets and identified, counted and weighed food items in their stomachs. We evaluated the importance of the different prey types by calculating the frequency of occurrence, abundance and mass. We used these values to calculate the index of relative importance (IRI) for each taxonomic category and a modified index (MI) which did not incorporate %N into the formula. Gammarideans were dominant food items in terms of %F but showed a very low MI value; the bivalve Acanthocardia tubercolata was the dominant species in terms of %W and MI value. The prey items were mostly benthic organisms belonging to the assemblage of fine, well-sorted sands showing that X. novacula is a benthic feeder. Despite the large number of prey taxa found, few species accounted for most of the prey consumed, indicating specialist feeding, as confirmed by the low value of the Levins’ standardised index. We found significant differences in prey distribution among size classes, with the highest prey diversity recorded in 120–140 mm TL size classes. Correspondence analysis showed a trend of increasing predator size classes among prey items, with small prey, such as copepods and amphipods, in the smallest predator size classes and bigger prey in the larger ones. Prey caught by larger predators differed significantly in weight from those taken by smaller specimens. There was a significant positive correlation of fish length with bivalves, decapods and echinoids, and a negative one with copepods, ostracods, caprellids, gammarideans. There were no significant differences between males and females of overlapping sizes. Juveniles are able to exploit only small, vulnerable prey, while adults take few, large prey, thereby avoiding competition with juveniles.

Keywords

benthos diet ecology Mediterranean Sicily 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, M.J. 2000NPMANOVA: a FORTRAN computer program for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance (for any two-factor ANOVA design) using permutation testsDepartment of StatisticsUniversity of AucklandGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M.J. 2001A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of varianceAustralian Ecol.263246Google Scholar
  3. Bentivegna, F., Rasotto, M.B. 1987Protogynous hermaphroditism in Xyrichthys novacula (L.1758)Cybium117578Google Scholar
  4. Candi, G., L. Castriota, F. Andaloro, M.G. Finoia & G. Marino. 2004. Reproductive cycle and sex inversion in razor fish, Xyrichthys novacula, a protogynous labrid in the southern Mediterranean Sea. J. Fish Biol. (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Cardinale, M., Colloca, F., Ardizzone, G.D. 1997aGrowth and reproduction of Xyrichthys novacula (Pisces: Labridae) in the Mediterranean SeaScientia Marina62193201Google Scholar
  6. Cardinale, M., Colloca, F., Ardizzone, G.D. 1997bFeeding ecology of Mediterranean razorfish Xyrichthys novacula in the Tyrrhenian Sea (Central Mediterranean Sea)J. Appl. Ichthyol.13105111Google Scholar
  7. Ferry, L.A., Cailliet, G.M. 1996Sample size and data analysis: are we characterizing and comparing diet properlyMacKinley, D.Shearer, K. eds. GUTSHOP’96. Feeding ecology and nutrition in fish: symposium proceedingsAmerican Fisheries SocietySan Francisco. CA7180Google Scholar
  8. Fischer, W., M.L. Bauchot & M. Schneider. 1987. Fiches FAO d’identification des espéces pour les besoins de la pêche. (Révision 1). Méditerranée et Mer Noire. Zone de Pêche 37. Vertébrés. Vol. 2. FAO Rome. 700 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, W. (ed.). 1978. FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Western Central Atlantic (fishing area 31). Vol. 2. FAO Rome.Google Scholar
  10. Fischer, W.Bianchi, G.Scott, W.B. eds. 1981FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes Eastern Central Atlantic; fishing areas 3447, Vol. 1 (in part).Canada Funds-in-TrustOttawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibson, R.N., Ezzi, I.A. 1987Feeding relationships of a demersal fish assemblage on the west coast of ScotlandJ. Fish Biol.315569Google Scholar
  12. Grossmann, G.D. 1980Ecological aspects of ontogenetic shifts in prey size utilization in the bay goby (Pisces: Gobiidae)Oecologia47233238Google Scholar
  13. Hacunda, J.S. 1981Trophic relationships among demersal fishes in a coastal area of the Gulf of MaineFishery Bull.79775788Google Scholar
  14. Hayse, J.W. 1990Feeding habits, age, growth, and reproduction of Atlantic spadefish Chaetodipterus faber (Pisces: Ephippidae) in South CarolinaFishery Bull.886783Google Scholar
  15. Holbrook, S.J., Schmitt, R.J., Coyer, J.A. 1985Age-related dietary patterns of sympatric adult surfperchCopeia1985986994Google Scholar
  16. Honda, H., Masatoshi, K. 1997Size selective feeding and its limitations for the black rockfish, Sebastes inermis, in a demersal fish assemblage of Onagawa Bay, northeastern JapanEnviron. Biol. Fishes50183193Google Scholar
  17. Hureau, J.C. eds. 1996Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean World Biodiversity Database CD-ROM Series.ETI Expert Center for Taxonomic Identification/UNESCOParisGoogle Scholar
  18. Hurlbert, S.H. 1978The measurement of niche overlap and some relativesEcology596777Google Scholar
  19. Hyslop, E.J. 1980Stomach content analysis–a review of methods and their applicationJ. Fish Biol.17411429Google Scholar
  20. Krebs, C.J. 1989Ecological methodologyHarper Collins PublishersNew York654 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. Lukoschek, V., McCormick, M.I. 2001Ontogeny of diet changes in a tropical benthic carnivorous fish, Parupeneus barberinus (Mullidae): relationship between foraging behaviour, habitat use, jaw size, and prey selectionMarine Biol.13810991113Google Scholar
  22. Marconato, A., Tessari, V., Marin, G. 1995The mating system of Xyrichthys novacula: sperm economy and fertilization successJ. Fish Biol.47291301Google Scholar
  23. McArdle, B.H., Anderson, M.J. 2001Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysisEcology82290297Google Scholar
  24. McCormick, M.I. 1998Ontogeny of diet shifts by a microcarnivorous fish, Cheilodactylus spectabilis: relationship between feeding mechanics, microhabitat selection and growthMarine Biol.132920Google Scholar
  25. Osenberg, C.W., Werner, E., Mittelbach, G.G., Hall, D.J. 1988Growth patterns in bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) and pumpkinseed (L.gibbosus) sunfish: environmental variation and the importance of ontogenetic niche shifts.Can. J. Fisheries Aquatic Sci.451726Google Scholar
  26. Panetta, P. 1980La famiglia Caecidae nel MediterraneoBollettino Malacologico16277300in ItalianGoogle Scholar
  27. Pérès, J.M. 1967The Mediterranean benthosOceanogr. Marine Biol. Ann. Rev.5449533Google Scholar
  28. Polis, G.A. 1984Age structure component of niche width and intraspecific resource partitioning: can age groups function as ecological speciesAm. Naturalist123541564Google Scholar
  29. Riera, F. & M. Linde. 2001. El raor, Xyrichthys novacula (Linnaeus, 1758). pp. 9--34. In: El raor i la cirviola. Conèixer per preservar. Quaderns de Pesca. Governo de les Illes Balears, Conselleria d’Agricultura i Pesca 6 [in Catalan].Google Scholar
  30. Ros, J.D., Romero, J., Ballesteros, E., Gili, J.M. 1985Diving in blue water The benthosMargalef, R. eds. Key environments: Western MediterraneanPergamon PressNewYork233295Google Scholar
  31. Ross, S.T. 1978Trophic ontogeny of the leopard sarobin, Prionotus scitulus (Pisces: Triglidae)Fishery Bull.76225234Google Scholar
  32. Schmitt, R.J., Holbrook, S.J. 1984Ontogeny of prey selection by black surfperch Embiotoca jacksoni (Pisces: Embiotocidae): the roles of fish morphology, foraging behaviour, and patch selectionMarine Ecol. Prog. Series18225239Google Scholar
  33. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J. 1969BiometryW.H. Freeman and CompanySan Francisco.776 ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Stoner, A.W., Livingston, R.J. 1984Ontogenetic patterns in diet and feeding morphology in sympatric sparid fishes from seagrass meadowsCopeia1984174187Google Scholar
  35. Wainwright, P. 1988Morphology and ecology: functional basis of feeding constraints in Caribbean labrid fishesEcology69635645Google Scholar
  36. Werner, E.E., Mittelbach, G.G., Hall, D.J., Gilliam, J.F. 1983Experimental tests of optimal habitat use in fish: The role of relative habitat profitabilityEcology6415251539Google Scholar
  37. Werner, E.E., Gilliam, J.F. 1984The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populationsAnn. Rev. Ecol. System.15393425Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Castriota
    • 1
  • Maria Pia Scarabello
    • 1
  • Maria Grazia Finoia
    • 2
  • Mauro Sinopoli
    • 1
  • Franco Andaloro
    • 1
  1. 1.I.C.R.A.M. (Istituto Centrale per la Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica Applicata al Mare/Central Institute for Applied Marine Research)PalermoItaly
  2. 2.I.C.R.A.M.RomaItaly

Personalised recommendations