Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 73, Issue 1, pp 89–96 | Cite as

Thermal preference of Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus, and brown trout, Salmo trutta – implications for their niche segregation

  • Stefan LarssonEmail author


This study tested a new experimental apparatus to estimate thermal preferences of fish. The apparatus was designed to minimise the effect of the thermal history of the fish and allow for easy feeding. The set-up consisted of two connected sections of an aquarium, both receiving an excess of food, with slightly different water temperatures. Initially, the fish spent most of its time in one of the sections, but when the temperatures were slowly increased (or decreased), the fish spent increasingly more time in the other. The temperature at which the fish spent equal time in both sections was defined as the preferred temperature. Brown trout, Salmo trutta, preferred the reported optimal temperature for growth of the species. However, Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus, selected a significantly lower temperature than its optimal temperature for growth and thus contradicted the general view of good correlation between the optimal temperature for growth and preferred temperature of fish. The reason for this may be that charr is optimising its growth efficiency instead of its growth rate. Individuals that utilise a limited resource in an optimal way, by selecting a temperature where the growth efficiency is maximised, will possibly be favoured. Several factors affect the distribution of fish in lakes, but the difference in thermal preference between charr and trout might partly explain the frequently observed niche segregation of these two species in Scandinavian lakes.


temperature selection growth feeding salmonids competition 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barans, C.A., Tubb, R.A. 1973Temperature selected seasonally by four fishes from Western Lake ErieJ. Fish. Res. Board Canada3016971703Google Scholar
  2. Beitinger, T.L., Magnuson, J.J. 1979Growth rates and temperature selection of bluegill, Lepomis macrochirusTrans. Am. Fish. Soc.108378382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brett, J.R. 1971Energetic responses of salmon to temperature. A study of some thermal relations in the physiology and freshwater ecology of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka)Am. Zool.1199113Google Scholar
  4. Cincotta, D.A., Stauffer, J.R.,Jr. 1984Temperature preference and avoidance studies of six North American freshwater fish speciesHydrobiologia109173177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elliott, J.M., Hurley, M.A., Fryer, R.J. 1995A new, improved growth model for brown trout, Salmo truttaFunct. Ecol.9290298Google Scholar
  6. Elliott, J.M., Hurley, M.A. 1999A new energetics model for brown trout, SalmotruttaFreshwater Biol.42235246Google Scholar
  7. Elliott, J.M., Hurley, M.A. 2000Daily energy intake and growth of piscivorous trout, Salmo truttaFreshwater Biol.44237245Google Scholar
  8. Elliott, J.M., Hurley, M.A. 2000Optimal energy intake and gross efficiency of energy conversion for brown trout, Salmo trutta, feeding on invertebrates or fishFreshwater Biol.44605615Google Scholar
  9. Forseth, T., Jonsson, B. 1994The growth and food ration of piscivorous brown trout (Salmo trutta)Funct. Ecol.8171177Google Scholar
  10. Fry, F.E.J. 1947Effects of the environment on animal activityUniversity of Toronto Studies Biological Series No55162Google Scholar
  11. Hall, L.W.,Jr., Hocutt, C.H., Stauffer, J.R.,Jr. 1978Implication of geographic location on temperature preference of white perch, Morone americanaJ. Fish. Res. Board Canada3214641468Google Scholar
  12. Hammar J. (1998). Evolutionary Ecology of Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus (L.)): Intra- and Interspecific Interactions in Circumpolar Populations. Ph.D. thesis, University of Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  13. Hegge, O., Dervo, B.K., Skurdal, J., Hessen, D.O. 1989Habitat utilization by sympatric arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus (L.)) and brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in Lake Atnsjø, south-east NorwayFreshwater Biol.22143152Google Scholar
  14. Jansen, P.A., Slettvold, H., Finstad, A.G., Langeland, A. 2002Niche segregation between Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) and brown trout (Salmo trutta): an experimental study of mechanismsCan. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.59611Google Scholar
  15. Jobling, M. 1981Temperature tolerance and the final preferendum – rapid methods for the assessment of optimal growth temperaturesJ. Fish Biol.19439455Google Scholar
  16. Jobling, M. 1997Temperature and growth: modulation of growth rate via temperature changeWood, C.M.McDonald, D.G. eds. Global Warming: Implications for Freshwater and Marine Fish.Cambridge University PressCambridge UK225253Google Scholar
  17. Jørgensen, L., Halvorsen, M., Amundsen, P.-A. 2000Resource partitioning between lake-dwelling Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr, brown trout (Salmo truttaL.) and Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L.). EcolFreshwater Fish9202209Google Scholar
  18. Karlsson, J., Jonsson, A., Jansson, M. 2001Bacterioplankton production in lakes along an altitude gradient in the subarctic north of SwedenMicrobial Ecol.42372382Google Scholar
  19. Kelsch, S.W., Neill, W.H. 1990Temperature preference versus acclimation in fishes: selection for changing metabolic optimaTrans. Am. Fish. Soc.119601610Google Scholar
  20. Konecki, J.T., Woody, C.A., Quinn, T.P. 1995Temperature preference in two populations of juvenile coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutchEnviron. Biol. Fish.44417421Google Scholar
  21. Langeland, A., L’-Abee-Lund, J.H., Jonsson, B., Jonsson, N. 1991Resource partitioning and niche shift in Arctic charr Salvelinus alpinus and brown trout Salmo trutta.J. Anim. Ecol.60895912Google Scholar
  22. Larsson, S., Berglund, I. 1998Growth and food consumption of 0+ Arctic charr fed pelleted or natural food at six different temperaturesJ. Fish Biol.52230242Google Scholar
  23. Larsson, S. 2002. Thermal Performance of Arctic Charr: Intra-specific Variation and Competitive Ability. Ph.D. thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden 000 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Mac, M.J. 1985Effects of ration size on preferred temperature of lake charr Salvelinus namaycushEnviron. Biol. Fish.14227231Google Scholar
  25. McCauley, R.W., Huggins, N.W. 1979Ontogenetic and non-thermal seasonal effects on thermal preferenda of fishAm. Zool.19267271Google Scholar
  26. McCauley, R.W. & J.M. Casselman. 1980. The final preferendum as an index of the temperature for optimal growth in fish. pp 81–92. In: K. Tiews (ed.) Proceedings of the World Symposium on Aquaculture in Heated Effluents and Recirculation Systems, Vol. 2, Heenemann, Berlin.Google Scholar
  27. Neill, W.H., Magnuson, J.J., Chipman, G.G. 1972Behavioral thermoregulation by fishes: a new experimental approachScience17614431445Google Scholar
  28. Nilsson, N.-A. 1955Studies on the feeding habitats of trout and char in north Swedish lakesRep. Inst. Freshwater Res., Drottningholm36163225Google Scholar
  29. Nilsson, N.-A. 1963Interaction between trout and char in Scandinavia TransAm. Fish. Soc.92276285Google Scholar
  30. Ojanguren, A.F., Reyes-Gavilán, F.G., Braña, F. 2001Thermal sensitivity of growth, food intake and activity of juvenile brown troutJ. Thermal Biol.26165170Google Scholar
  31. Peterson, R.H., Sutterlin, A.M., Metcalfe, J.L. 1979Temperature preference of several species of Salmo and Salvelinus and some of their hybridsJ. Fish. Res. Board Canada3611371140Google Scholar
  32. Power, G. 1973Estimates of age, growth, standing crop and production of salmonids in some north Norwegian rivers and streamsRep. Instit.Freshwater Res., Drottningholm5379111Google Scholar
  33. Reynolds, W.W., Casterlin, M.E. 1979Behavioral Thermoregulation and the ‘Final Preferendum’ ParadigmAm. Zool.19211224Google Scholar
  34. Reynolds, W.W., Casterlin, M.E. 1979Thermoregulatory behavior of brown trout, Salmo truttaHydrobiologia627980Google Scholar
  35. Reynolds, W.W., Casterlin, M.E. 1981Behavioral thermoregulatory abilities of tropical coral reef fishes: a comparison with temperate freshwater and marine fishesEnviron. Biol. Fishes6347349Google Scholar
  36. SAS Institute Inc. 1997. JMP, Release 3.2.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  37. Stauffer, J.R., Hocutt, C.H., Goodfellow, W.F. 1985Effects of sex and maturity on preferred temperatures: a proximate factor for increased survival of young Poecilia latipinna?Archiv Hydrobiol.103129132Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AquacultureSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations