Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 72, Issue 3, pp 241–249 | Cite as

Influence of riffle characteristics, surficial geology, and natural barriers on the distribution of the channel darter, Percina copelandi, in the Lake Ontario basin

  • Scott M. ReidEmail author
  • Leon M. Carl
  • Jason Lean
Article

Synopsis

The channel darter, Percina copelandi, is a small benthic fish with a wide but disjunct distribution across central North America. The development of conservation and recovery strategies for Canadian populations is limited by a lack of knowledge regarding ecology, population size and other factors that affect its distribution and abundance. We sampled five rivers in the Lake Ontario basin to test whether the distribution of P. copelandi reflected riffle habitat characteristics or landscape-scale factors such as surficial geology and natural barriers (waterfalls). At most sites yielding P. copelandi, riffles flowed into deep sand bottomed run or pool habitats. Despite a lack of association with local surficial geology or riffle habitat characteristics, both the upstream limits of P. copelandi occurrence and distribution of suitable habitats reflected the distribution of waterfalls, chutes and bedrock outcroppings. In contrast to P. copelandi, distributions of Etheostoma flabellare, P. caprodes and Rhinichthys cataractae reflected among site differences in riffle habitat.

Keywords

benthic fishes rivers habitat waterfalls COSEWIC 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, R.M., Smith, G.R. 1981Origin and geography of the fish fauna of the Laurentian Great LakesCan. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.3815391561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxter, C.V., Frissell, C.A., Hauer, F.R. 1999Geomorphology, logging roads and the distribution of bull trout spawning in a forested river basin: Implications for management and conservationTrans. Am. Fish. Soc.128854867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Branson, B.A. 1967Fishes of the Neosho River system in OklahomaAm. Midland Nat.78126154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, M.D., Claborn, A.H., Cofer, L.M., Heger, T.G., Tyler, J.D. 1997The occurrence of the channel darter (Perciformes: Percidae) in the East Cache Creek system of southwest OklahomaProc. Oklahoma Acad. Sci.77127129Google Scholar
  5. Burr, B.M., Page, L.M. 1986Zoogeography of fishes of the lower Ohio-Upper Mississippi basinHocutt, C.H.Wiley, E.O. eds. The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater FishesJohn Wiley & SonsNew York287324Google Scholar
  6. Chapman, L.J., Putnam, D.F. 1984The Physiography of Southern Ontario3Ontario Geological Survey Toronto270Special Volume 2Google Scholar
  7. Daniels, R.A. 1993Habitat of the eastern sand darter, Ammocrypta pellucidaJ. Freshwater Ecol.8287295Google Scholar
  8. Etnier, D.A., Starnes, W.C. 1993The Fishes of TennesseeUniversity of Tennessee PressKnoxville681Google Scholar
  9. Freeman, M.C. 1995Movements by two small fishes in a large streamCopeia1995361367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hicks, B.J. 2003Distribution and abundance of fish and crayfish in a Waikato stream in relation to basin areaNew Zeal. J. Zool.30149160Google Scholar
  11. Hicks, B.J., Hall, J.D. 2003Rock type and channel gradient structure salmonid populations in the Oregon Coast RangeTrans. Am. Fish. Soc.132468482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hill, J., Grossman, G.D. 1987Home range estimates for three North American stream fishesCopeia1987376380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson, D.A., Peres-Neto, P.R., Olden, J.D. 2001What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities–the roles of biotic, abiotic and spatial factorsCan. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.58157170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jenkins, R.E., Burkhead, N.M. 1993Freshwater Fishes of VirginiaAmerican Fisheries SocietyBethesda1079Google Scholar
  15. Kondolf, G.M. 1997Application of the pebble count: Notes on purpose, method, and variantsJ. Am. Water Res. Assoc.337987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kruse, C.G., Hubert, W.A., Rahel, F.J. 1997Geomorphic influences on the distribution of Yellowstone cutthroat trout in the Absaroka Mountains, WyomingTrans. Am. Fish. Soc.126418427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuehne, R.A., Barbour, R.W. 1983The American DartersThe University Press of KentuckyLexington177Google Scholar
  18. Luttrell, G.R., Echelle, A.A., Fisher, W.L., Eisenhour, D.J. 1999Declining status of two species of the Macrohybopsis aestivalis complex (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in the Arkansas River basin and related effects of reservoirs as barriers to dispersalCopeia1999981989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mandrak, N.E. 1994Biogeographic patterns in fish species distributions in relation to historical and environmental factors in Ontario lakes and riversUniversity of TorontoToronto285Ph.D. DissertationGoogle Scholar
  20. Mandrak, N.E., Crossman, E.J. 1992Postglacial dispersal of freshwater fishes into OntarioCan. J. Zool.7022472259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Manly, B.F.J. 1986Multivariate statistical methods: a primerChapman and HallLondon157Google Scholar
  22. Mattingly, H.T., Galat, D.L. 2002Distributional patterns of the threatened Niangua darter, Etheostoma nianguae, at three spatial scales, with implications for species conservationCopeia2002573585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McCulloch, B.R., Stewart, K.W. 1998Range extension and new locality records for the Stonecat, Noturus flavus, in Manitoba: Evidence for a recent natural invasionCan. Field-Nat.112217224Google Scholar
  24. Minns, C.K. 2001Science for freshwater fish habitat management in Canada: Current status and future prospectsAquat. Ecosyst. Health and Manage.4423436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nelson, R.L., Platts, W.S., Larsen, D.P., Jensen, S.E. 1992Trout distribution and habitat in relation to geology and geomorphology in the North Fork Humboldt River drainage, Northeastern NevadaTrans. Am. Fish. Soc.121405426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Page, L.M., Burr, B.M. 1991A field guide to freshwater fishes of North America north of MexicoHoughton Mifflin CompanyBoston432Google Scholar
  27. Pflieger, W.L. 1997The Fishes of Missouri2Missouri Department of ConservationJefferson City343Google Scholar
  28. Porto, L.M., McLaughlin, R.L., Noakes, D.L.G. 1999Low-head barrier dams restrict the movements of fishes in two Lake Ontario streamsNorth Am. J. Fish. Manage.1910281036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rempel, L.L., Smith, D.G. 1998Postglacial fish dispersal from the Mississippi refuge to the MacKenzie River basinCan. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.55893899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Reid, S.M. 2004Age-estimates and length distributions of Ontario channel darter (Percina copelandi) populationsJ. Freshwater Ecol.19441444Google Scholar
  31. Rosgen, D. 1996Applied River MorphologyWildlife HydrologyPagosa Springs390Google Scholar
  32. Schrank, S.J., Guy, C.S., Whiles, M.R., Brock, B.L. 2001Influence of instream and landscape-level features on the distribution of Topeka Shiners (Notropis Topeka) in Kansas streamsCopeia2001413421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schlosser, I.J. & P.L. Angermeier. 1995. Spatial variation in the demographic processes of lotic fishes: conceptual models, empirical evidence, and implications for conservation. pp. 392–401. In: J.L. Neilson & D.M. Power (eds.), Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation. American Fisheries Society Monograph Series No. 17.Google Scholar
  34. Schofield, P.J., Ross, S.T. 2003Habitat selection of the channel darter, Percina (Cottogaster) copelandi, a surrogate for the imperiled pearl darter, Percina auroraJ. Freshwater Ecol.18249257Google Scholar
  35. Scott, W.B., Crossman, E.J. 1973Freshwater fishes of Canada. Bulletin 184Fisheries Research Board of CanadaOttawa966Google Scholar
  36. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J. 1981Biometry2W.H. Freeman and CompanyNew York859Google Scholar
  37. Sokar, R.R., Rohlf, F.J. 1995Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological researchW.H. Freeman and CompanyNew York850Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, C.M. 1996Abundance and distribution of a guild of benthic stream fishes: local processes and regional patternsFreshwater. Biol.36385396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trautman, M.B. 1981The fishes of OhioOhio State University PressColumbus782Google Scholar
  40. Wang, L., Lyons, J., Rasmussen, P., Seelbach, P., Simon, T., Wiley, M., Kanehl, P., Baker, E., Nimela, S., Stewart. , P.M. 2003Watershed, reach, and riparian influences on stream fish assemblages in the Northern Lakes and Forest Ecoregion, U.S.ACan. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.60491505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Winn, H.E. 1953Breeding habits of the percid fish Hadropterus copelandi in MichiganCopeia12630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Winn, H.E. 1958Comparative reproductive behaviour and ecology of fourteen species of darters (Pisces-Percidae)Ecol. Monogr.28155191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Winston, M.R., Taylor, C.M., Pigg, J. 1991Upstream extirpation of four minnow species due to damming of a prairie streamTrans. Am. Fish. Soc.12098105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wood, B.M., Bain, M.B. 1995Morphology and microhabitat use in stream fishCan. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.5214871498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Engelwood Cliffs, 718 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Zorn, T.G., Seelbach, P.W., Wiley, M.J. 2002Patterns in the distributions of stream fishes in Michigan’s Lower PeninsulaTrans. Am. Fish. Soc.1317085CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Watershed Science CentreTrent University OntarioCanada
  2. 2.Great Lakes Science CentreUnited States Geological SurveyAnn ArborU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations