Livestock and Carnivores: Economic and Ecological Interactions

  • Anne Borge JohannesenEmail author
  • Jon Olaf Olaussen
  • Anders Skonhoft


Carnivores-livestock interactions cause human-wildlife conflicts worldwide. These interactions are present under a wide range of ecological and economic circumstances. This paper studies the relationship between predation mortality and natural mortality, when food availability affects natural mortality of the livestock. Semi-domestic Saami reindeer (Rangifer t. tarandus) herding in Norway is used as a case study. When predation affects reindeer density, food competition among reindeer changes, which changes weights and natural mortality in the reindeer population. An age-structured bio-economic model is presented, where this relationship is taken into account. While predation mortality may be additional to natural mortality in absence of food limitation, it can compensate for natural mortality in situations of food scarcity. Furthermore, due to density dependency in livestock weights, predation may increase the meat value of livestock. The paper analyzes how predation affects livestock production and economic performance under an optimized management scheme. One main result is that predation shifts the optimal harvesting composition towards calf harvesting and, therefore, the optimal stock composition among the different categories of animals. This contrasts findings in the existing bioeconomic literature. Furthermore, a changing harvesting pattern towards calf harvest is an important adjustment that highly limits the negative impact on profit of predation.


Livestock-predation model Food limitation Ecological and economic compensation mechanisms 

JEL Classification

Q2 Q24 



  1. Ballard WB, Lutz D, Keegan TW, Carpenter LH, deVos JC Jr (2001) Deer-predator relationships: a review of recent North American studies with emphasis on mule and black-tailed deer. Wildl Soc Bull 29:99–115Google Scholar
  2. Bårdsen BJ, Tveraa T (2012) Density-dependence vs. density-independence—linking reproductive allocation to population abundance and vegetation greenness. J Anim Ecol 81:364–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bårdsen BJ, Tveraa T, Fauchald P, Langeland K (2010) Observational evidence of risk-sensitive reproductive allocation in a long-lived mammal. Oecologia 162:627–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bårdsen BJ, Berglann H, Stien A, Tveraa T (2014) Effekten av høsting på produksjon og lønnsomhet i reindriften. NINA report 999, TromsøGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger KM (2006) Carnivore-livestock conflicts: effects of subsidized predator control and economic correlates in the sheep industry. Conserv Biol 20:751–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertram C, Quaas MF (2017) Biodiversity and optimal multi-species ecosystem management. Environ Resour Econ 67:312–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boman M, Bostedt G, Persson J (2003) The bioeconomics of the spatial distribution of an endangered species. The case of the Swedish wolf population. J Bioecon 5:55–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borowik T, Wawrzyniak P, Jedrzejewska B (2016) Red deer (Cervus elaphus) fertility and survival of young in a low-density population subject to predation and hunting. J Mammal 97:1671–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyce MS, Sinclair ARE, White GC (1999) Seasonal compensation of predation and harvesting. Oikos 87:419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caswell H (2001) Matrix population models: construction, analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. Sinauer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark C (1990) Mathematical bioeconomics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Ekspertutvalget (2011) Innstilling fra ekspertutvalg vedrørende endringer i erstatningsordningen for rovviltskade på husdyr. Direktoratet for Naturforvaltning, TrondheimGoogle Scholar
  13. Elofsson K, Mensah J, Kjellander P (2017) Optimal management of two ecologically interacting deer species—reality matters, beliefs don’t. Nat Resour Model 1:1. Google Scholar
  14. Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S (2008) Designing payment for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol Econ 85:663–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Getz A, Haigh RG (1989) Population harvesting. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham K, Beckerman AP, Thirgood S (2005) Human-predator-prey conflicts: ecological correlates, prey losses and patterns of management. Biol Conserv 122:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hausner VH, Fauchald P, Jernsletten J-L (2012) Community-based management: under what conditions do Sámi pastoralists manage pastures sustainably? PLoS ONE 7:e51187. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johannesen AB, Skonhoft A (2009) Local common property exploitation with rewards. Land Econ 85:637–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johannesen AB, Skonhoft A (2011) Livestock as insurance and social status: evidence from reindeer herding in Norway. Environ Resour Econ 48:679–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johansen B, Karlsen SR (2005) Monitoring vegetation changes on Finnmarksvidda, Northern Norway, using Landsat MSS and Landsat TM/ETM + satellite images. Phytocoenologia 35:969–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kolowski JM, Holekamp KE (2006) Spatial, temporal, and physical characteristics of livestock depredations by large carnivores along a Kenyan reserve border. Biol Conserv 128:529–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumpula J, Kurkilahti M, Helle T, Colpaert A (2014) Both reindeer management and several other land use factors explain the reduction in ground lichens (Cladonia spp.) in pastures grazed by semi-domesticated reindeer in Finland. Reg Environ Change 14:541–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mattisson J, Odden J, Nilsen EB, Linnell JDC, Persson J, Andrén H (2011) Factors affecting Eurasian lynx kill rates on semi-domestic reindeer in northern Scandinavia: can ecological research contribute to the development of a fair compensation system? Biol Conserv 144:3009–3017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mattisson J, Arntsen GB, Nilsen EB, Loe LE, Linnell JDC, Odden J, Persson J, Andrén H (2014) Lynx predation on semi-domestic reindeer: do age and sex matter? J Zool 292:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mattisson J, Rauset GR, Odden J, Andrén H, Linnell JDC, Persson J (2016) Predation or Scavenging? Prey body condition influences decision-making in a facultative predator, the wolverine. Ecospehere 7(8):1–14Google Scholar
  27. Mishra C (1997) Livestock depredation by large carnivores in the Indian trans-Himalaya: conflict perceptions and conservation prospects. Environ Conserv 24:338–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mysterud A, Yoccoz NG, Stenseth NC, Langvatn R (2001) Effects of age, sex and density on body weight of Norwegian red deer: evidence of density-dependent senescence. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:911–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Næss MW, Bårdsen B-J (2015) Market economy vs. risk management: how do nomadic pastoralists respond to increasing meat prices? Hum Ecol 43:425–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Naevdal E, Olaussen JO, Skonhoft A (2012) A bioeconomic model of trophy hunting. Ecol Econ 73:194–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nieminen M (2010) The impact of large carnivores on the mortality of semi-domesticated reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus L.) calves in Kainuu, southeastern reindeer region in Finland. Rangifer 30:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nilsen E, Pettersen T, Gundersen H, Mysterud A, Milner J, Solberg E, Andreassen H, Stenseth NC (2005) Moose harvesting strategies in the presence of wolves. Spatially structured populations. J Appl Ecol 42:389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norwegian Reindeer Husbandry Administration (NRHA) (2013) Totalregnskap for reindriftsnæringen, AltaGoogle Scholar
  34. Norwegian Reindeer Husbandry Administration (NRHA) (2014) Ressursregnskap for reindriftsnæringen, AltaGoogle Scholar
  35. Olaussen JO, Skonhoft A (2011) A cost benefit analysis of moose harvesting in Scandinavia. A stage structured modelling approach. Resour Energy Econ 33:589–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pekkarinen A-J, Kumpula J, Tahvonen O (2015) Reindeer management and winter pastures in the presence of supplementary feeding and government subsidies. Ecol Model 312:256–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pekkarinen A-J, Kumpula J, Tahvonen O (2017) Parameterization and validation of an ungulate-pasture model. Ecol Evolut 7:8282–8302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Riseth JÅ, Vatn A (2009) Modernization and pasture degradation: a comparative study of two Sami reindeer pasture regions in Norway. Land Econ 85:87–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sinclair ARE, Pech RP (1996) Density dependence, stochasticity, compensation and predator regulation. Oikos 75:164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Skonhoft A (2006) The costs and benefits of animal predation: an analysis of Scandinavian wolf re-colonization. Ecol Econ 58:830–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Skonhoft A (2008) Sheep as capital and farmers as portfolio managers: a bioeconomic model of Scandinavian sheep farming. Agric Econ 38:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skonhoft A, Vestergaard N, Quaas M (2012) Optimal harvest in an age structured model with different fishing selectivity. Environ Resour Econ 51:525–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skonhoft A, Veiberg V, Gauteplasss A, Olaussen JO, Meisingset E, Mysterud A (2013) Balancing income and cost in reindeer management. J Environ Manag 115:170–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skonhoft A, Johannesen AB, Olaussen JO (2017) On the tragedy of the commons: when predation predation and livestock loss may improve the economic lot of herders. Ambio online March 30Google Scholar
  45. St. prp. Nr. 63 (2007–2008) Om reindriftsavtalen 2008/2009 og om endringer i statsbudsjettet for 2008 m.m. Landbruks- og matdepartementetGoogle Scholar
  46. Tahvonen O (2009) Economics of harvesting age-structured fish populations. J Environ Econ Manag 58:281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tahvonen O, Quaas M, Schmidt J, Voss R (2013) Optimal harvesting of an age-structured schooling fishery. Environ Resour Econ 54:21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tahvonen O, Kumpula J, Pekkarinen A-J (2014) Optimal harvesting of an age-structured, two-sex herbivore-plant system. Ecol Model 272:348–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tveraa, T., M. Ballesteros, B-J Bårdsen, P. Fauchald, M. Lagergren, K. Langeland, E. Pedersen, A. Stien (2012) Rovvilt og reindrift – kunnskapsstatus i Finnmark. NINA report 821, TromsøGoogle Scholar
  50. Tveraa T, Fauchald P, Henaug C, Yoccoz NG (2003) An examination of a compensatory relationship between food limitation and predation in semi-domestic reindeer. Popul Ecol 137:370–376Google Scholar
  51. Tveraa T, Fauchald P, Yoccoz NG, Ims RA, Aanes R, Høgda KA (2007) What regulate and limit reindeer populations in Norway? Oikos 116:706–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tveraa T, Stien A, Bårdsen B-J, Fauchald P (2013) Population densities, vegetation green-up, and plant productivity: impact on reproductive success and juvenile body mass in reindeer. PLoS ONE 88:e56450. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tveraa T, Stien A, Brøseth H, Yoccoz NG (2014) The role of predation and food limitation on claims for compensation, reindeer demography and population dynamics. J Appl Ecol 51:1264–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vucetich JA, Smith DW, Stahler DR (2005) Influence of harvest, climate and wolf predation on Yellowstone elk, 1961-2004. Oikos 111:259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilen JE (2000) Renewable resource economists and policy: what differences have we made? J Environ Econ Manag 39:306–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wilmers CC, Post E, Hastings A (2007) The anatomy of predator-prey dynamics in a changing climate. J Anim Ecol 76:1037–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zabel A, Pittel K, Bostedt G, Engel S (2011) Comparing conventional and new policy approaches for carnivore conservation: theoretical results and application to tiger conservation. Environ Resour Econ 48:287–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zabel A, Bostedt G, Engel S (2014) Performance payments for groups: the case of carnivore conservation in northern Sweden. Environ Resour Econ 59:613–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.NTNU Business SchoolNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations