Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 431–447 | Cite as

Fiscal Pressure, Tax Competition and Environmental Pollution

  • Junhong BaiEmail author
  • Jiayu Lu
  • Sijia Li
Article
  • 557 Downloads

Abstract

As one of the strategies local governments adopt in response to fiscal stress, tax competition influences the social optimum level of public goods such as environment. This paper aims to investigate the mechanism of regional tax competitions from the perspective of financial stress. Recently, the effect of tax competition on environmental pollution rises gradually. Existing empirical researches mostly apply a fiscal decentralization-based perspective and ignore the spatial correlation between pollution and tax competition. Under the perspective of financial stress, this paper measures the impact of inter-regional enterprise income tax competition and value-added tax competition on environmental pollution of 30 provinces, using empirical analysis, and then estimates the direct effect, indirect effect and total effect based on it from year 2004–2014. It’s been found that inter-regional tax competition not only brings negative influence to local environment, but also makes the environmental quality become worse in spatial correlation regions. These findings are of enlightening politic revelations to further standardize enterprise tax competition among local governments, and to promote the sustainable development both in economy and environment.

Keywords

Fiscal pressure Tax competition Environmental pollution Spatial econometrics 

Supplementary material

10640_2018_269_MOESM1_ESM.docx (50 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 49 kb)
10640_2018_269_MOESM2_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 13 kb)
10640_2018_269_MOESM3_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 15 kb)
10640_2018_269_MOESM4_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Anselin L, Florax R, Bera AK et al (1996) Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26(1):77–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bierbrauer F, Brett C et al (2013) Strategic nonlinear income tax competition with perfect labor mobility. Games Econ Behav 82(1):292–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjorvatn K, Schjelderup G (2002) Tax competition and international public goods. Int Tax Public Finance 9(2):111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brueckner JK (2003) Strategic interaction among governments: an overview of empirical studies. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(2):175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chirinko R, Wilson DJ (2011) Tax competition among US states: racing to the bottom or riding on a seesaw?. Federal Reserve Bank, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  6. Cremer H, Gahvari F (2004) Environmental taxation, tax competition, and harmonization. J Urban Econ 55(1):21-45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cremer H, Marchand M, Pestieau P (1997) Investment in local public services: nash equilibrium and social optimum. J Public Econ 65(1):23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cui YF, Liu XC (2010) Provincial tax competition and environmental pollution: based on panel data from 1998 to 2006 in China. J Finance Econ 36(4):46–55Google Scholar
  9. Cutter WB, Deshazo JR (2007) The environmental consequences of decentralizing the decision to decentralize. J Environ Econ Manag 53(1):32–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dean JM, Lovely ME et al (2009) Are foreign investors attracted to weak environmental regulations? Evaluating the evidence from China. J Dev Econ 90(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frankel JA (2003) The environment and globalization. Nber Working Papers 55(2):161–210Google Scholar
  12. Fredriksson PG, Millimet DL (2002) Strategic interaction and the determination of environmental policy across U.S. States. J Urban Econ 51(1):101–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu Y (2008) Why China’s decentralization is different: an analytical framework considering political incentives and fiscal incentives. J World Econ 11:16–25Google Scholar
  14. Han L, Kung KS (2015) Fiscal incentives and policy choices of local governments: evidence from China. J Dev Econ 116:89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He J, Liu LL, Zhang YJ (2016) Tax competition, revenue decentralization and China’s environmental pollution. China Popul Resour Environ 26(4):1–7Google Scholar
  16. Ihori T, Yang CC (2009) Interregional tax competition and intraregional political competition: the optimal provision of public goods under representative democracy. J Urban Econ 66(3):210–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keen M, Marchand M (1997) Fiscal competition and the pattern of public spending. Core Discussion Papers RP 66(1):33–53Google Scholar
  18. Letchumanan R, Kodama F (2000) Reconciling the conflict between the ‘pollution-haven’ hypothesis and an emerging trajectory of international technology transfer. Res Policy 29(1):59–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. List JA, Co CY (2000) The effects of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment. J Environ Econ Manag 40(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu J, Li W (2013) Environmental pollution and intergovernmental tax competition in China: based on spatial panel data model. China Popul Resour Environ 23(04):81–88Google Scholar
  21. Liu JM, Wang B, Chen X (2015) A study on the nonlinear effect of political decentralization on environmental pollution—based on the PSTR model analysis of the panel data in 272 cities, China. Econ Perspect 03:82–89Google Scholar
  22. Markusen JR, Morey ER, Olewiler N (1995) Competition in regional environmental policies when plant locations are endogenous. J Public Econ 56(1):55–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Millimet DL (2010) Assessing the empirical impact of environmental federalism. J Reg Sci 43(4):711–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oates WE (1972) Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  25. Pace RK, Lesage JP (2008) Biases of ols and spatial lag models in the presence of an omitted variable and spatially dependent variables. Social Science Electronic PublishingGoogle Scholar
  26. Rauscher M (2005) Economic growth and tax-competing leviathans. Int Tax Public Finance 12(4):457–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. United States. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Kenyon DA (1991) Interjurisdictional tax and policy competition: good or bad for the federal system? Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, United StatesGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang H, Jin Y (2007) Industrial ownership and environmental performance: evidence from china. Environ Resour Econ 36(3):255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weingast BR (2009) Second generation fiscal federalism: the implications of fiscal incentives. J Urban Econ 65(3):279–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. William JB, Oates WE (1988) The theory of environmental policy: efficiency without optimality: the charges and standards approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Wilson JD (1999) Theories of tax competition. Natl Tax J 52(2):269–304Google Scholar
  32. Woods ND (2006) Interstate competition and environmental regulation: a test of the race-to-the-bottom thesis. Soc Sci Q 87(1):174–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu C (2011) The fundamental institutions of China’s reforms and development. J Econ Lit 49(4):1076–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang T, Zou HF (1998) Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China. J Public Econ 67(2):221–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessNanjing Normal UniversityNanjing CityChina

Personalised recommendations