Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 71, Issue 3, pp 729–754 | Cite as

Non-market Value of Winter Outdoor Recreation in the Swiss Alps: The Case of Val Bedretto

  • Massimo Filippini
  • William Greene
  • Adan L. Martinez-Cruz


A longstanding interest from environmental economists on winter outdoor recreation has overlooked activities practiced outside the boundaries of winter resorts—e.g. ski mountaineering. This paper implements the Travel Cost Method to estimate consumer surplus per season derived from ski mountaineering and snowshoeing in Val Bedretto—a valley located in the Swiss Alps. In addition, the Contingent Behavior Method is used to estimate the changes in welfare associated with the construction of an alpine center that would provide services aiming to reduce the risk of injury and death associated with winter outdoor recreation. The data is analyzed by means of latent class panel on-site count models. The latent class approach allows us to identify subpopulations that benefit from the alpine center. The results show that 33% of visitors would experience an increase in their consumer surplus per season equivalent to €31 per visitor.


Winter outdoor recreation Travel cost method Contingent behavior method Ski mountaineering Snowshoeing Switzerland 

JEL Classification

Q51 Q57 

Supplementary material


  1. Abrahamsen Y, Hälg F, Simmons-Süer B, Sturm J-E (2015) Forecasts for tourism in Switzerland: issue October 2015. KOF studies 68. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH ZurichGoogle Scholar
  2. Amoako-Tuffour J, Martínez-Espiñeira R (2012) Leisure and the net opportunity cost of travel time in recreation demand analysis: an application to Gros Morne National Park. J Appl Econ 15(1):25–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson DM (2010) Estimating the economic value of ice climbing in Hyalite Canyon: an application of travel cost count data models that account for excess zeros. J Environ Manag 91(4):1012–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Androkovich RA (2014) Recreational visits to the Adam’s river during the annual sockeye run: a travel cost analysis. Mar Resour Econ 30(1):35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azevedo CD, Herriges JA, Kling CL (2003) Combining revealed and stated preferences: consistency tests and their interpretations. Am J Agric Econ 85(3):525–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Awondo SN, Egan KJ, Dwyer DF (2011) Increasing beach recreation benefits by using wetlands to reduce contamination. Mar Resour Econ 26(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butsic V, Hanak E, Valletta RG (2011) Climate change and housing prices: hedonic estimates for ski resorts in western North America. Land Econ 87(1):75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christie M, Hanley N, Hynes S (2007) Valuing enhancements to forest recreation using choice experiment and contingent behaviour methods. J For Econ 13(2):75–102Google Scholar
  9. Cicchetti CJ, Fisher AC, Smith VK (1976) An econometric evaluation of a generalized consumer surplus measure: the mineral king controversy. Econometrica 1259–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Englin J, Cameron TA (1996) Augmenting travel cost models with contingent behavior data. Environ Resour Econ 7(2):133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Englin J, Moeltner K (2004) The value of snowfall to skiers and boarders. Environ Resour Econ 29(1):123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Englin J, Shonkwiler JS (1995) Estimating social welfare using count data models: an application to long-run recreation demand under conditions of endogenous stratification and truncation. Rev Econ Stat 77(1):104–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gonzalez JM, Loomis JB, Gonzalez-Caban A (2008) A joint estimation method to combine dichotomous choice CVM models with count data TCM Models corrected for truncation and endogenous stratification. J Agric Appl Econ 40(2):681–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grijalva TC, Berrens RP, Bohara AK, Shaw WD (2002) Testing the validity of contingent behavior trip responses. Am J Agric Econ 84(2):401–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haab TC, McConnell KE (2002) Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non-market valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanley N, Bell D, Alvarez-Farizo B (2003) Valuing the benefits of coastal water quality improvements using contingent and real behaviour. Environ Resour Econ 24(3):273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heil N (2015) More than 100 skiers died in the Alps this winter. Was it just a bad year or is this the new norm? Last accessed: 05 Dec 2016
  18. Hellerstein D, Mendelsohn R (1993) A theoretical foundation for count data models. Am J Agric Econ 75(3):604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hilbe J (2007) Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hynes S, Greene W (2013) A panel travel cost model accounting for endogenous stratification and truncation: a latent class approach. Land Econ 89(1):177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hynes S, Greene W (2016) Preference heterogeneity in contingent behaviour travel cost models with on-site samples: a random parameter vs. a latent class approach. J Agric Econ 67:348–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research (ISAR, 2014). Long term statistics. Last accessed 05 Dec 2016
  23. Jeon Y, Herriges JA (2010) Convergent validity of contingent behavior responses in models of recreation demand. Environ Resour Econ 45(2):223–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kosenius AK, Horne P (2015) Welfare effects of mining externalities: a combined travel cost and contingent behaviour study. J Environ Econ Policy 5:1–18Google Scholar
  25. Kössler, Z (2014) Estimating the economic value of snow sports activities in Val Bedretto. Master thesis, Università della Svizzera italiana, LuganoGoogle Scholar
  26. Lamprecht M, Fischer A, Stamm HP (2014) Sport Schweiz 2014: Sportaktivität und Sportinteresse der Schweizer Bevölkerung. Bundesamt für Sport BASPO, MagglingenGoogle Scholar
  27. Landauer M, Pröbstl U, Haider W (2012) Managing cross-country skiing destinations under the conditions of climate change-scenarios for destinations in Austria and Finland. Tour Manag 33(4):741–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Layman RC, Boyce JR, Criddle KR (1996) Economic valuation of the Chinook salmon sport fishery of the Gulkana River, Alaska, under current and alternate management plans. Land Econ 113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lienhoop N, Ansmann T (2011) Valuing water level changes in reservoirs using two stated preference approaches: an exploration of validity. Ecol Econ 70(7):1250–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Loomis JB (1993) An investigation into the reliability of intended visitation behavior. Environ Resour Econ 3(2):183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Loomis J, Gonzalez-Caban A, Englin J (2001) Testing for differential effects of forest fires on hiking and mountain biking demand and benefits. J Agric Resour Econ 508–522Google Scholar
  32. Martinez-Cruz AL (2016) Handling excess zeros in count models for recreation demand analysis without apology. CER-ETH working paper 16/253.
  33. Martinez-Cruz AL, Sainz-Santamaria J (2017) Recreational value of two peri-urban forests in Mexico City. El Trimestre EconomicoGoogle Scholar
  34. Martínez-Espiñeira R, Chopin T, Robinson S, Noce A, Knowler D, Yip W (2015) Estimating the biomitigation benefits of integrated multi-trophic aquaculture: a contingent behavior analysis. Aquaculture 437:182–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moen J, Fredman P (2007) Effects of climate change on alpine skiing in Sweden. J Sustain Tour 15(4):418–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morey ER (1981) The demand for site-specific recreational activities: a characteristics approach. J Environ Econ Manag 8(4):345–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morey ER (1984) The choice of ski areas: estimation of a generalized CES preference ordering with characteristics. Rev Econ Stat 66:584–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morey ER (1985) Characteristics, consumer surplus, and new activities: a proposed ski area. J Public Econ 26(2):221–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mules T (2005) Economic impacts of national park tourism on gateway communities: the case of Kosciuszko National Park. Tour Econ 11(2):247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mullahy J (1997) Heterogeneity, excess zeros, and the structure of count data models. J Appl Econom 12:337–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Phaneuf DJ, Smith VK (2005) Recreation demand models. Handb Environ Econ 2:671–761Google Scholar
  42. Sælen H, Ericson T (2013) The recreational value of different winter conditions in Oslo forests: a choice experiment. J Environ Manag 131:426–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scarpa R, Tempesta T, Thiene M (2003) Non-participation, demand intensity and substitution effects in an integrable demand system: the case of day trips to the North-Eastern Alps. In: Hanley N, Shaw WD, Wright R (eds) The new economics of outdoor recreation. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  44. Scarpa R, Thiene M (2005) Destination choice models for rock climbing in the Northeastern Alps: a latent-class approach based on intensity of preferences. Land Econ 81(3):426–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Scarpa R, Thiene M, Tempesta T (2007) Latent class count models of total visitation demand: days out hiking in the eastern Alps. Environ Resour Econ 38(4):447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scarpa R, Thiene M, Train K (2008) Utility in willingness to pay space: a tool to address confounding random scale effects in destination choice to the Alps. Am J Agric Econ 90(4):994–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shaw D (1988) On-site samples’ regression: problems of non-negative integers, truncation, and endogenous stratification. J Econom 37(2):211–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simões P, Barata E, Cruz L (2013) Joint estimation using revealed and stated preference data: an application using a national forest. J For Econ 19(3):249–266Google Scholar
  49. Smith JW, Seekamp E, McCreary A, Davenport M, Kanazawa M, Holmberg K, Wilson B, Nieber J (2016) Shifting demand for winter outdoor recreation along the North Shore of Lake Superior under variable rates of climate change: a finite-mixture modeling approach. Ecol Econ 123:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Touring Club Switzerland (TCS, 2013). Ein Durchschnittsfahrzeug kostet 76 Rappen pro Kilometer: Schnelle und einfache Berechnung der Kilometerkosten dank dem TCS. Last accessed: 05 Dec 2016
  51. Tukey J (1949) Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5(2):99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Von Haefen RH (2002) A complete characterization of the linear, log-linear, and semi-log incomplete demand system models. J Agric Resour Econ 27(2):281–319Google Scholar
  53. Von Haefen RH, Phaneuf DJ (2003) Estimating preferences for outdoor recreation: a comparison of continuous and count data demand system frameworks. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45(3):612–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ward FA (1987) Economics of water allocation to instream uses in a fully appropriated river basin: evidence from a New Mexico wild river. Water Resour Res 23(3):381–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whitehead JC, Haab TC, Huang JC (2000) Measuring recreation benefits of quality improvements with revealed and stated behavior data. Resour Energy Econ 22(4):339–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitehead JC, Dumas CF, Herstine J, Hill J, Buerger B (2008a) Valuing beach access and width with revealed and stated preference data. Mar Resour Econ 23:119–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Whitehead JC, Pattanayak SK, Van Houtven GL, Gelso BR (2008b) Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: an assessment of the state of the science. J Econ Surv 22(5):872–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Energy Policy and EconomicsETH-ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Università della Svizzera Italiana, USILuganoSwitzerland
  3. 3.Economics Department, Stern School of BusinessNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsCentro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE)AguascalientesMexico

Personalised recommendations