Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 70, Issue 4, pp 835–860 | Cite as

Moving Toward Greener Societies: Moral Motivation and Green Behaviour

  • Lorenzo Cerda Planas
Article

Abstract

I provide an alternative explanation for why societies exhibit varied environmental behaviours. I use a Kantian moral approach at a microeconomic level. I show that two identical societies (in terms of income level and political system) might follow different paths with respect to their “green” behaviour. Additionally, I identify tipping points that could nudge a society from a polluting behaviour to a green one. I find that the perception of environment within the society can be an important factor in this shift.

Keywords

Green behaviour Kantian morale Moral motivation Tipping points 

JEL Classification

C62 D64 D72 H41 Q50 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I want to thank Bertrand Wigniolle, Eugenio Figueroa, and Scott Barrett for their invaluable help and support. I would also like to thank Maria Kuecken and Alessandra Pizzo for their thorough revision, as well as the various conference and seminar participants, two anonymous referees and the editor who have helped me formulate and articulate these ideas.

Supplementary material

References

  1. Andreoni J (1990) Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ J 100(401):464–477Google Scholar
  2. Baumgärtner S, Petersen T, Schiller J (2014) Bringing norms into action—the concept of responsibility. Working paper, University of LünenburgGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernauer T, Koubi V (2004) On the political determinants of environmental quality. Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Chicago and the Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  4. Bisin A, Verdier T (1998) On the cultural transmission of preferences for social status. J Pub Econ 70(1):75–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bisin A, Verdier T (2000) A model of cultural transmission, voting and political ideology. Eur J Polit Econ 16(1):5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bisin A, Verdier T (2001) The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences. J Econ Theory 97(2):298–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowles S (1998) Endogenous preferences: the cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions. J Econ Lit 36:75–111Google Scholar
  8. Brekke KA, Nyborg K (2008) Attracting responsible employees: Green production as labor market screening. Resour Energy Econ 30(4):509–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brekke KA, Kverndokk S, Nyborg K (2003) An economic model of moral motivation. J Pub Econ 87(9–10):1967–1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breton M, Sbragia L, Zaccour G (2010) A dynamic model for international environmental agreements. Environ Resour Econ 45(1):25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruvoll A, Halvorsen B, Nyborg K (2000) Household sorting of waste at source. Econ Surv 4(2000):26–35Google Scholar
  12. Buenstorf G, Cordes C (2008) Can sustainable consumption be learned? A model of cultural evolution. Ecol Econ 67(4):646–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Calvo E, Rubio SJ et al (2012) Dynamic models of international environmental agreements: a differential game approach. Int Rev Environ Resour Econ 6:289–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Comin D, Rode J (2013) From green users to green voters. Working Paper 19219, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  15. Corbett JB, Durfee JL (2004) Testing public (un) certainty of science media representations of global warming. Sci Commun 26(2):129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunwoody S (2007) The challenge of trying to make a difference using media messages. In: Creating a climate for change, pp 89–104Google Scholar
  17. Extreme Weather and Climate Change in the American Mind April 2013. http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/article/extreme-weather-public-opinion-April-2013
  18. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a north American free trade agreement. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  19. Hollander H (1990) A social exchange approach to voluntary cooperation. Am Econ Rev 80(5):1157–1167Google Scholar
  20. Kant I (1785) Groundwork of the metaphysics of moralsGoogle Scholar
  21. Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Lowe L, Visser PS (2006) The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: a study of popular concern about global warming. Clim Change 77(1–2):7–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuran T (1991) Now out of never: the element of surprise in the east european revolution of 1989. World Polit 44(10):7–48 ISSN 1086-3338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laffont J-J (1975) Macroeconomic constraints, economic efficiency and ethics: an introduction to kantian economics. Economica 42(168):430–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee TM, Markowitz E (2013) Disparity in the predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception worldwideGoogle Scholar
  25. Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change 77(1–2):45–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nyborg K (2011) I don’t want to hear about it: rational ignorance among duty-oriented consumers. J Econ Behav Organ 79(3):263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nyborg K, Rege M (2003) Does public policy crowd out private contributions to public goods. Pub Choice 115(3–4):397–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nyborg K, Howarth RB, Brekke KA (2006) Green consumers and public policy: on socially contingent moral motivation. Resour Energy Econ 28(4):351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Panayotou T (1993) Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Technical report, International Labour OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  30. Persson T, Roland G, Tabellini G (2000) Comparative politics and public finance. J Polit Econ 108(6):1121–1161 ISSN 00223808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rege M (2004) Social norms and private provision of public goods. J Pub Econ Theory 6(1):65–77 ISSN 1467-9779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rentmeester C (2010) A Kantian look at climate change. Essays Philos 11(1):76–86Google Scholar
  33. Roemer JE (2010) Kantian equilibrium. Scand J Econ 112(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saha S (2007) Democratic institutions and provision of public good. University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series qt55f3c17g, Department of Economics, UC Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  35. Schumacher I (2009) The dynamics of environmentalism and the environment. Ecol Econ 68(11):2842–2849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schumacher I (2014) An empirical study of the determinants of green party voting. Ecol Econ 105:306–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shafik N (1994) Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, pp 757–773Google Scholar
  38. Ulph DT, Daube MPK (2014) Moral behaviour, altruism and environmental policyGoogle Scholar
  39. Wirl F (2011) Global warming with green and brown consumers. Scand J Econ 113(4):866–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zahran S, Brody SD, Grover H, Vedlitz A (2006) Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Soc Nat Resour 19(9):771–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Paris 1 Panthéon - SorbonneParisFrance
  2. 2.Santiago CentroChile

Personalised recommendations