Abstract
This paper assesses the evidence for and against the view that the processes that deliver ecosystem services are so fundamental within ecosystems that neither the services themselves nor the goods that they deliver to humans could be replaced technologically. I consider cases where the natural processes have been replaced and also the probably more common and usually less invasive cases where they have been enhanced by technological interventions. Supporting services are probably least amenable to technology, with the major exception of nutrient cycling, which has been extensively replaced by the use of chemical fertilizers. Final services offer more examples of actual or potential replacement, including the highly controversial example of geoengineering for climate regulation. Finally, there are numerous examples of replacement technologies for environmental goods, especially in the case of energy (fossil and many renewable fuels), fibres (artificial fibres) and biochemicals (industrial pharmaceuticals). The full economic costs of replacement technologies have rarely been explored, and in some cases it appears that the replacement is more expensive than the natural service. Enhancement technologies, in contrast, supplement the output of ecosystem services and are probably in most cases more benign. The doubts about true costs and the fact that many supporting and final services seem either irreplaceable or only replaceable at huge cost adds to the need to protect them.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barton J, Pretty J (2010) What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environ Sci Technol 44:3947–3955
Bateman I, Mace G, Fezzi C, Atkinson G, Turner K (2010) Economic analysis for ecosystem service assessments. National Ecosystem Assessment, DEFRA, London
Brennan L, Owende P (2010) Biofuels from microalgae—a review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:557–577
Brittain C, Kremen C, Klein A-M (2013a) Biodiversity buffers pollination from changes in environmental conditions. Glob Change Biol 19:540–547
Brittain C, Williams N, Kremen C, Klein A-M (2013b) Synergistic effects of non-Apis bees and honey bees for pollination services. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280(1754). doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2767
Buijse D, Coops H, Staras M, Jans LH, Van Geest GJ, Grift RE, Ibelings BW, Oosterberg W, Roozen FCJM (2002) Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe. Freshw Biol 47:889–907
Bürstmayer H, Ban T, Anderson JA (2009) QTL mapping and marker-assisted selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat: a review. Plant Breed 128:1–26
Charpentier M, Oldroyd G (2010) How close are we to nitrogen-fixing cereals? Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:556–564
Chichilnisky G, Heal G (1998) Economic returns from the biosphere. Nature 391:629–630
Cook SM, Khan ZR, Pickett JA (2007) The use of push-pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annu Rev Entomol 52:375–400
Cordell D, Drangert J-O, White S (2009). The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob Environ Chang 19:292–305
Daily GC, Alexander S, Ehrlich PR et al (1997). Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues in ecology 2. Ecological Society of America
Ehrlich PR (1968) The population bomb. Ballantine, New York
Elimelech M, Phillip WA (2011) The future of seawater desalination: energy. Technol Environ Sci 333:712–717
Foresight (2011) The future of food and farming. Final project report, The Government Office for Science, London
General Household Survey (2002) Living in Britain. Office for National Statistics, London
Grahman IA, Besser K, Blumer S, Branigan CA, Czechowski T, Elias L, Guterman I, Harvey D, Isaac PG, Khan AM, Larson TR, Li Y, Pawson T, Penfield T, Rae AM, Rathbone DA, Reid S, Ross J, Smallwood MF, Segura V, Townsend T, Vyas D, Winzer T, Bowles D (2010) The genetic map of Artemisia annua L. identifies loci afffecting yield of the antimalarial drug artemisinin. Sci 327:328–331
Godfray HCJ et al (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812
Goldman JC (1979) Outdoor algal mass cultures—1. Applications. Water Res 13:1–19
Haszeldine RS (2009) Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be? Science 325:1647–1652
Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink JL (2009) Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci 49:1–12
Heikkinen J, Ketoja E, Nuutinen V, Regina K (2013) Declining trend of carbon in Finnish cropland soils in 1974–2009. Glob Change Biol (in press)
Helgason T, Daniell TJ, Husband R, Fitter AH, Young JPW (1998) Ploughing up the wood-wide web? Low diversity of mycorrhizal fungi in arable crops. Nature 394:431–432
Jenkinson DS (2001) The impact of humans on the nitrogen cycle, with focus on temperate cereal agriculture. Plant Soil 228:3–15
Khan ZR, Pickett JA, van den Berg J, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM (2000) Exploiting chemical ecology and species diversity: stem borer and striga control for maize and sorghum in Africa. Pest Manag Sci 56:957–962
Kogan M (1998) Integrated pest management: historical perspectives and contemporary developments. Annu Rev Entomol 43:243–270
Li X, Weng J-K, Chapple C (2008) Improvement of biomass through lignin modification. Plant J 54:569–581
Lomborg B (2001) The skeptical environmentalist: measuring the real state of the world. Cambridge University
Lovasi GS, Quinn JW, Neckerman GM, Perzanowski MS, Rundle A (2008) Children living in areas with more street trees have lower asthma prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health 62:647–649
Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW (1972). The limits to growth. Universe Books, New York
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington
Naik SN, Goud VV, Rout PK (2010) Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:578–597
Partap UMA, Partap TEJ, Yonghua HE (2001) Pollination failure in apple crop and farmers’ management strategies in Hengduan mountains, China. Acta Hortic (ISHS) 561:225–230
Pierce FJ, Nowak P (1999) Aspects of precision agriculture. Adv Agron 67:1–85
Pretty J (2010) Health values from ecosystems. National Ecosystem Assessment, Chapter 23. DEFRA, London
Rodriguez H, Fraga R (1999) Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol Adv 17:319–339
Shepherd J (2009) Geoengineering the climate. Science, policy and uncertainty. The Royal Society, London, p 81
Sohi SP, Krull E, Lope-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron 105:47–82
Tilmes S, Müller R, Salawitch R (2008) The sensitivity of polar ozone depletion to proposed geoengineering schemes. Science 320:1201–1204
Trenberth KE, Dai A (2007) Effects of Mount Pinatubo volcanic eruption on the hydrological cycle as an analog of geoengineering. Geophys Res Lett 34:L15702
Wigley TML (2006) A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization. Sci 314:452–454
Yu X-D, Pickett JA, Ma Y-Z, Bruce T, Napier J, Jones HD, Xia L-Q (2012) Metabolic engineering of plant-derived (\(E)-\beta \)-farnesene synthase genes for a novel type of aphid-resistant genetically modified crop plants. J Integr Plant Biol 54:282–299
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to the following members of a seminar organized as part of the Royal Society People and Planet working group, at which some of these ideas were originally discussed: Roy Anderson, Stefano Brandani, Tim Fox, Charles Godfray, Louise Heathwaite, John Lawton, Ottoline Leyser, Georgina Mace, Jenny Nelson, Jon Price, Nilay Shah, Adel Sharif, John Shepherd, John Sulston, and Nikolaos Voulvoulis; and to the Royal Society staff involved (Claire Chivers, Ruth Cooper, Rachel Garthwaite, Nick Green, Marie Rumsby). Mike Childs, Charles Godfray, Louise Heathwaite, Ottoline Leyser, Jules Pretty and Dave Rafaelli all provided valuable comments on a draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fitter, A.H. Are Ecosystem Services Replaceable by Technology?. Environ Resource Econ 55, 513–524 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9676-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-013-9676-5