Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 107–117 | Cite as

Is Corporate Social Responsibility Associated with Lower Wages?

Article

Abstract

Firms with a reputation as socially responsible may have an important cost advantage: If workers prefer their employer to be socially responsible, equilibrium wages may be lower in such firms. We explore this hypothesis, combining Norwegian register data with data on firm reputation collected by an employer branding firm. Adjusting for a large set of background variables, we find that the firm’s social responsibility reputation is significantly associated with lower wages.

Keywords

Self-regulation Wage differentials CSR 

JEL Classification

C51 D21 D64 Q56 

Supplementary material

10640_2012_9617_MOESM1_ESM.doc (200 kb)
ESM (DOC 200 kb)

References

  1. Arora S, Gangopadhyay S (1995) Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance. J Econ Behav Organ 28(3):289–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron D (2007) Corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship. J Econ Manag Strateg 16(3):683–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron D (2009) A positive theory of moral management, social pressure, and corporate social performance. J Econ Manag Strateg 200918(1):7–43Google Scholar
  4. Benabou R, Tirole J (2010) Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica 77:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Besley T, Ghatak M (2005) Competition and incentives with motivated agents. Am Econ Rev 95(3):616–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Besley T, Ghatak M (2007) Retailing public goods: the economics of corporate social responsibility. J Public Econ 91(9):1645–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brekke KA, Nyborg K (2008) Attracting responsible employees: green production as labor market screening. Resour Energy Econ 30:509–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brekke KA, Nyborg K (2010) Selfish bakers, caring nurses? A model of work motivation. J Econ Behav Organ 75:377–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Lindley JK (2009) Dirty money: is there a wage premium for working in a pollution intensive industry? J Risk Uncertain 39:161–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cullis J, Lewis A, Winnett A (1992) Paying to be good? UK ethical investments. Kyklos 45:3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frank RH (2004) What price the moral high ground? Ethical Dilemmas in Competitive Environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  12. Heal G (2005) Corporate social responsibility: an economic and financial framework. Geneva Pap Risk Insur 30(3):387–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heckman JC, Lochner LJ, Todd PE (2006) Earnings functions, rates of return and treatment effects: the Mincer equation and beyond. In: Hanushek E, Welch F (eds) Handbook of the economics of education, vol 1. Ch 7. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 307–458Google Scholar
  14. Leete L (2001) Whither the nonprofit wage differential? Estimates from the 1990 census. J Labor Econ 19(1):136–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lemieux T (2006) The “Mincer equation”. Thirty years after ‘schooling, experience, and earnings’. In: Grossbard S (ed) Jacob Mincer: a pioneer of modern labor economics. Springer, Berlin, pp 127–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2008) Corporate social responsibility and the environment: a theoretical perspective. Rev Environ Econ Policy 2(2):240–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (2011) Greenwash: corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. J Econ Manag Strateg 20(1):3–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McWilliams A, Siegel D (2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strateg Manag J 21(5):603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McWilliams A, Siegel D (2001) Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Acad Manag Rev 26(1):117–127Google Scholar
  20. Mocan HN, Tekin E (2003) Nonprofit sector and part-time work: an analysis of employer–employee matched data on child care workers. Rev Econ Stati 85(1):38–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Portney PR (2008) The (not so) new corporate social responsibility: an empirical perspective. Rev Environ Econ Policy 2(2):261–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Telle K (2006) ‘It pays to be green’—a premature conclusion? Environ Resour Econ 35(3):195–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Waddock SA, Graves SB (1997) The corporate social performance—financial performance link. Strateg Manag J 18(4):303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Ragnar Frisch Center for Economic ResearchOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations