Ecosystem Service Value and Agricultural Conversion in the Amazon: Implications for Policy Intervention
We explore the welfare implications of agricultural expansion in the Brazilian Amazon by comparing spatially explicit estimates of soybean rents and the value of ecosystem services. Although these estimates are generated from different datasets, models, and estimation techniques, the values are comparable, such that the value of ecosystem services is greater than soybean rents for about 61% of the total area and 24% of the area where soybean rents are positive if protected areas are well enforced. Based on the balance between the benefits and costs of conversion, failure to value ecosystem services reduces total social welfare by 7.13 billion dollars annually relative to an optimum. Policy instruments that internalize the value of ecosystem services via protected lands, land conversion taxes, conservation subsidies, or excise taxes can avoid much of this loss. Regardless of intervention regime, policy makers should be cognizant of the diminishing net benefits of converting natural ecosystems to agriculture. Realizing the final 3.8% requires the conversion of an additional 15% natural ecosystems to soybean production.
KeywordsEcosystem services Agriculture Land use policy Tax policy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bowman M, Soares-Filho B et al Persistence of cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon: a spatial analysis of theh rationale for beef production. Land Use Policy (Under Review)Google Scholar
- Braziliense C (2011) Aldo Rebelo, the Forestry Code and 65 suggestions—Aldo Rebelo, o Código Florestal e 65 sugestões. Cerreio Braziliense 2010 Available via http://www.correiobraziliense.com.br/app/noticia/brasil/2010/06/28/interna_brasil,199730/index.shtml. Cited 10 Mar 2011
- CRS (2006) Brazil’s agricultural production and exports: selected data. In: Hanrahan CE (ed) CRS report for congress. Congressional Research Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Mann M, Kaufmann R et al Pasture conversion and competitive land rents in the Amazon (in preparation)Google Scholar
- MEA (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment synthesis report. In: Reid W (ed) Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- MFFR (2008) Tax system and administration in Brazil. In: Maciel E, Ferreira Verdi M, Rodrigues J, Wasilewski LF (eds) General-coordination of tax polixy. Ministry of finance federal revenue, BraziliaGoogle Scholar
- Moreira H, Assuncao J (2001) Towards a truthful land taxation mechanism in Brazil. LACEA, MontevideoGoogle Scholar
- Santhanna S (2011) Fellowship of Mato Grosso goes to Brasilia to defend the ’New Forest Code’—Comitiva de Mato Grosso vai à Brasília em defesa do ‘Novo Código Florestal’. Available via http://www.expressomt.com.br/noticiaBusca.asp?cod=123170&codDep=3. Cited 11 Mar 2011
- Soares Filho B, Dietzsch L, Moutinho P et al (2008) Reduction of carbon emissions associated with deforestation in Brazil: the role of the Amazon Region Protected Areas Program (ARPA). World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), BrasiliaGoogle Scholar
- WHRC (2007) Three essential strategies for reducing deforestation. In: Developed by Alianca da Terra, Amigos da Terra, Instituto Centro de Vida, IMAZON, IPAM, ISA. Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, and Wood Hole Research Center. Woods HoleGoogle Scholar
- WWF (2011) New threat to Amazon as Brazilian legislators lay siege to forest law. World Wildlife Foundation 2010 Available via http://wwf.panda.org/?194008/New-threat-to-Amazon-as-Brazilian-legislators-lay-siege-to-forest-law. 1 Mar 2011