Giving Stated Preference Respondents “Time to Think”: Results From Four Countries
- 331 Downloads
Previous studies have found that contingent valuation (CV) respondents who are given overnight to reflect on a CV scenario have 30–40% lower average willingness-to-pay (WTP) than respondents who are interviewed in a single session. This “time to think” (TTT) effect could explain much of the gap between real and hypothetical WTP observed in experimental studies. Yet giving time to think is still rare in binary or multinomial discrete choice studies. We review the literature on increasing survey respondents’ opportunities to reflect on their answers and synthesize results from parallel TTT studies on private vaccine demand in four countries. Across all four countries, we find robust and consistent evidence from both raw data and multivariate models for a TTT effect: giving respondents overnight to think reduced the probability that a respondent said he or she would buy the hypothetical vaccines. Average WTP fell approximately 40%. Respondents with time to think were also more certain of their answers, and a majority said they used the opportunity to consult with their spouse or family. We conclude with a discussion of why researchers might be hesitant to adopt the TTT methodology.
KeywordsStated preference Hypothetical bias Contingent valuation Stated choice
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alvarez-Farizo B, Hanley N (2006) Improving the process of valuing non-market benefits: combining citizens’ juries with choice modelling. Land Econ 82(3): 465–478Google Scholar
- Cameron TA, DeShazo JR (2010) Differential attention to attributes in utility-theoretic choice models. J Choice Model 3(3): 73–115Google Scholar
- Cook J, Sur D, Clemens J, Whittington D (2009) Evaluating investments in typhoid vaccines in two slums in Kolkata, India. J Health Popul Nutr 27(6): 711–724Google Scholar
- Jeuland M, Clemens J, Cook J, Whittington DDCES Group (2009) Incorporating herd protection into cost-effectiveness calculations of new-generation oral cholera vaccines: a multi-site analysis. Value Health 12(6): 899–908Google Scholar
- Lauria DT, Whittington D, Choe K, Turingan C, Abiad V (1999) Household demand for improved sanitation services: a case study of Calamba, Phillipines. In: Willis K, Bateman I (eds) Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 540–584Google Scholar
- Lienhoop N, Macmillan D (2002) Valuing wilderness in Iceland: new approaches in contingent valuation. Icel J Geogr 18(19(1): 29–40Google Scholar