Timing of Mitigation and Technology Availability in Achieving a Low-Carbon World
- 275 Downloads
This paper analyzes the economic and investment implications of a series of climate mitigation scenarios, characterized by different levels of ambition for long-term stabilization goals and transitional pathways. Results indicate that although milder climate objectives can be achieved at moderate costs, stringent stabilization paths, compatible with the 2°C target, might require significant economic resources. Innovation and technology are shown to be able to mitigate, but not structurally alter, this trade-off. Technologies that allow capturing CO2 from the atmosphere are shown to be important for expanding the feasibility space of stringent climate policies, though only if deployed at a scale which would represent a tremendous challenge. In general, the analysis indicates that the timing of mitigation is an important factor of cost containment, with early action being desirable. It also elaborates on the set of mitigation strategies and policies that would be required to achieve climate protection at maximum efficiency.
KeywordsClimate policy Stabilization costs
JEL ClassificationC72 H23 Q25 Q28
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blanford G, Richels R, Rutherford T (2009) Feasible climate targets: the roles of economic growth, coalition development and expectations, Energy Econ (in Press). doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.003
- Bosetti V, Carraro C, Galeotti M, Massetti E, Tavoni M (2006) WITCH: a world induced technical change hybrid model, The Energy J, Special issue on hybrid modeling of energy-environment policies: reconciling bottom-up and top-down, 13–38Google Scholar
- Bosetti V, Lubowski R, Golub A, Markandia A (2009a) Linking reduced deforestation and a global carbon market: impacts on costs, financial flows, and technological innovation Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Working Paper 56Google Scholar
- Bosetti V, Carraro C, Tavoni M (2009b) Climate change mitigation strategies in fast-growing countries: the benefits of early action, Energy Econ (in Press). doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2009.06.011
- Bosetti V, Carraro C, Tavoni M (2009c) Climate policy after 2012. Technology, timing, participation, CESifo economic studies, vol 55, 2/2009, pp 235–254Google Scholar
- Clarke L, Edmonds J, Jacoby H, Pitcher H, Reilly J, Richels R (2007) Scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric concentrations. Sub-report 2.1 a of synthesis and assessment product 2.1 by the US climate change science program and the subcommittee on global change research, Department of energy, Office of biological & environmental research, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Eliasch J (2008) Climate change: financing global forests. Office of Climate Change, UKGoogle Scholar