Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 23–45 | Cite as

Turning Water into Carbon: Carbon Sequestration and Water Flow in the Murray–Darling Basin

Article

Abstract

Large scale forest plantations in the Murray–Darling Basin are a possible carbon sequestration mechanism which may be adopted in response to the introduction of a carbon price. However, increased tree plantation will be associated with reduced inflows to river systems because of increased transpiration, interception and evaporation. This could have significant implications for regions vulnerable to drought. This study examines the interaction between carbon pricing, water pricing, and agricultural land use in the Murray–Darling Basin and its impact on water flow under current and climate change settings.

Keywords

Carbon sequestration Forestry Water Murray–Darling Basin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adamson D, Mallawaarachchi T, Quiggin J (2007) Water use and salinity in the Murray–Darling Basin: a state-contingent model. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 51: 263–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamson D, Mallawaarachchi T, Quiggin J (2006) State-contingent modelling of the Murray–Darling Basin: implications for the design of property rights. Paper presented at the 50th Annual Conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, Sydney, 8 Feb 2008Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008) Water and the Murray Darling Basin—a statistical profile, Australia 2000–2001 to 2005–2006, Catalogue No. 4610.0.55.007Google Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001) CATA 2001: Catalogue No: 2040.0.30.002, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Government (2008) Carbon pollution reduction scheme: Australia’s low pollution future. Department of Climate Change, White Paper, vol 1. Australian Government, Canberra, Dec 2008Google Scholar
  6. Australian Soil Research Information System (ASRIS) (2008) Geographic context—Atlas ASC Soil Order Layer, Murray–Darling Basin, URL: http://www.asris.csiro.au/mapping/viewer.htm. Accessed Nov 2008
  7. Barratt D, Parsons M, Welsh W, Nation E (2007) Investigating land use-change-scenario impacts: potential effects of reforestation on water yield in the Upper Murray River Basin, Water 2010 Technical Paper 5. Australian Government, Bureau of Rural Science, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown AE, Podger GM, Davidson AJ, Dowling TI, Zhang L (2007) Predicting the impact of plantation forestry on water users at local and regional scales: an example of the Murrumbidgee River Basin, Australia. For Ecol Manage 251(1–2): 82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bureau of Meteorology (2008) Historic rainfall data. URL: http://www.bom.gov.au/jsp/ncc/cdio/weatherData/av?p_nccObsCode=18&p_display_type=dataFile&p_stn_num=080015. Accessed Nov 2008
  10. Chambers RG, Quiggin J (2000) Uncertainty, production, choice, and agency. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiew FHS, Vaze J, Viney NR, Jordan PW, Perraud J-M, Zhang L, Teng J, Young WJ, Penaarancibia J, Morden RA, Freebairn A, Austin J, Hill PI, Wiesenfeld CR, Murphy R (2008) Rainfall-runoff modelling across the Murray–Darling Basin. A report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Murray–Darling Basin Sustainable Yields Project. Water for a Healthy Country Flagship. CSIRO, p 70Google Scholar
  12. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) (2008) Water availability in the Murray–Darling Basin. Summary of a report to the Australian Government from the CSIRO Murray–Darling Basin Sustainable Yields Project, CSIRO, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  13. Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia (2004) Soil salinity tolerance of plants for agriculture and revegetation. URL: http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/content/lwe/salin/smeas/plant_salt_tolerance.htm. Accessed Jan 2009
  14. Farley KA, Jobbagy EG, Jackson RB (2005) Effects of afforestation on water yield: a global synthesis with implications for policy. Glob Chang Biol 11: 1565–1576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forestry Plantation Queensland, personal correspondence, Nov 2008, details available upon requestGoogle Scholar
  16. Fortunaso KL, Montagu KD, Barton CVM, Cowie AL, Rawson A, Wilson BR, George BH (2008) Carbon sequestration predictor for land use change in inland areas of New South Wales. New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Version 3.1, Sep 2008Google Scholar
  17. Garnaut R (2008a) The Garnaut climate change review: final report. Cambridge University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  18. Garnaut R (2008b) The Garnaut climate change review, economic modelling—technical paper 2: climate data methodology and assumptions. Cambridge University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  19. Harris-Adams K, Kingwell R (2009) An analysis of the spatial and temporal patterns of greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture in Western Australia and the opportunities for agroforestey offsets. Australian Agriculture and Resource Economics Society, Annual Conference, Cairns, 11–13 Feb 2009Google Scholar
  20. Herron N, Davis R, Jones R (2002) The effects of large-scale afforestation and climate change on water allocation in the Macquarie River catchment, NSW, Australia. J Environ Manag 65: 369–381Google Scholar
  21. Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2000) The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10(2): 423–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones RN, Whetton P, Walsh K, Page C (2001) Future impact of climate variability, climate change and land use change on water resources in the Murray–Darling Basin. Overview and Draft Program of Research, CSIRO, SepGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones RN, Preston B, Brooke C, Aryal S, Benyon R, Blackmore J, Chiew F, Kirby M, Maheepala S, Oliver R, Polglase P, Prosser I, Walker G, Young B, Young M (2008) Climate change and Australian water resources: first risk assessment and gap analysis. Australian Greenhouse Office and the National Water Commission, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones R, Durack P (2005) Estimating the impacts of climate change on Victoria’s runoff using a hydrological sensitivity model. CSIRO Atmospheric Research, AspendaleGoogle Scholar
  25. Mallawaarachchi T, Foster A (2009) Dealing with irrigation drought, the role of water trading in adapting to water shortages in 2007–2008 in the southern Murray–Darling Basin. Australian Bureau of Agriculture and Resource Economics, Research Report 09.6, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  26. McKenzie N, Jacquier D, Isbell R, Brown K (2004) Australian soils and landscapes: an illustrated compendium. CSIRO Publishing, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  27. Murray–Darling Basin Authority (2009) Annual Report 2008–2009, MDBA Publication No. 41/09, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  28. Murray–Darling Basin Commission (2005) Basin Salinity Management Strategy Operational Protocols, Canberra. URL:http://www.mdbc.gov.au/subs/dynamic_reports/bsms_op_protocols/HTML/appendix/2_1.htm. Accessed Nov 2008
  29. Murray–Darling Basin Commission (2003) Murray–Darling Basin Water Resources Fact Sheet, Nov 2003. URL: http://www.mdbc.gov.au/__data/page/20/water_resourcesver2.pdf. Accessed May 2008
  30. Murray–Darling Basin Commission (2002) Murray–Darling Basin Agreement, Schedule C, Attachment A, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  31. NSW Department of Primary Industries (2008) Summer crop gross margin budgets 2007/2008, Orange. URL: http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/farm-business/budgets. Accessed June 2008
  32. Parsons M, Frakes I, Garrand A (2007) Science for Decision Makers:. Plantations and Water Use, Bureau of Rural Science. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  33. PF Olsen Australia, personal correspondence, Nov 2008, details available upon requestGoogle Scholar
  34. Private Forests Tasmania (2004) Farm Forestry Series—Radiata Pine. URL: http://www.privateforests.tas.gov.au/files/active/0/2005_04_radiatia_costs_and_labour_estimates.pdf. Accessed Nov2008
  35. Productivity Commission (2009) Government Drought Support, Report No. 46, Final Inquiry Report, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  36. Quiggin J (2001) Environmental economics and the Murray–Darling River system. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 45(1): 67–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quiggin J, Adamson D, Schrobback P, Chambers S (2008) The implications for irrigation in the Murray–Darling Basin, paper commissioned for the Garnaut climate change review. Risk and Sustainable Management Group, School of Economics, University of Queensland, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Dijk AIJM, Hairsine PB, Arancibia JP, Dowling TI (2007) Reforestation, water availability and stream salinity: a multi-scale analysis in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia. For Ecol Manag 251: 94–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Dijk A, Evens R, Hairsine P, Khan S, Nathan R, Paydar Z, Viney N, Zhang L (2006) Risks to the shared water resources of the Murray–Darling Basin. Murray–Darling Basin Commission, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  40. Victorian Department of Primary Industries (2008) Blue Gum for Farm Forestry, Jan 2008, Agricultural Note, AG0851, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  41. Victorian Department of Primary Industries (2003) Radiata pine for farm forestry. Agricultural Note, AG0210, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  42. Wentworth Group of Concerted Scientist: (2006) Australia’s climate is changing Australia. Wentworth Group of Concerted Scientist, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  43. Wong P (2008) Water for the Future, Senator the Hon Penny Wong speech to the 4th Annual Australian Water Summit, Sydney, 29 Apr 2008Google Scholar
  44. Young MD, McColl JC (2009) Double trouble: the importance of accounting for and defining water entitlements consistent with hydrological realities. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 53: 19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR (2001) Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 37(3): 701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang L, Dowling T, Mocking M, Morris J, Admas G, Hickel K, Best A, Vertessy R (2003) Predicting the effects of large-scale afforestation on annual flow regime and water allocation: an example for the Goulburn Broken catchments. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Technical Report, 03/2005Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Risk and Sustainable Management Group, School of EconomicsUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations