Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 359–376 | Cite as

Who Pays a Price on Carbon?

Open Access
Article

Abstract

We use the 2003 Consumer Expenditure Survey and emissions estimates from an input-output model based on the 1997 US economy to estimate the incidence of a price on carbon induced by a cap-and-trade program or carbon tax in the context of the US. We present results on how much different income deciles pay for a carbon tax as well as which industries see the largest increase in costs due to a carbon tax. We illustrate the main determinant of the regressivity: consumption patterns for energy-intensive goods. Furthermore, on a per-capita basis a carbon price is much more regressive than calculations at the household level. We discuss policy options to offset the adverse distributional effects of a carbon emissions policy.

Keywords

Distributional incidence Carbon tax Tradable permits 

JEL Classification

Q52 Q58 H22 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Don Fullerton, Josh Graff-Zivin, Matthew Kahn, Gilbert Metcalf, Peter Reiss, MargaretWalls, seminar and conference participants, and anonymous referees for comments. We are responsible for all errors. Grainger acknowledges financial support from the National Science Foundation, Grant No. 0114437.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Andrew C, Gerald P (2007) Who pays taxes and who receives government spending? An analysis of federal, state and local tax and spending distributions, 1991–2004. http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/wp1.pdf.
  2. Boyce JK, Riddle ME (2009) Cap and dividend: a state-by-state analysis, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://e3network.org/papers/CAP_DIVIDEND_states.pdf
  3. Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Institute (2008) Economic Input-Output Life Cycle Assessment (EIO-LCA) model [Internet], Available from: http://www.eiolca.net/. Accessed 19 Jul 2008
  4. Caspersen Erik, Metcalf Gilbert E (1994) Is a value added tax regressive? Annual versus lifetime incidence measures. Natl Tax J 47: 731–746Google Scholar
  5. Citro CF, Michael RT (1995) Measuring poverty: a new approach. National Academy Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Letter from David Elmendorf (CBO Director) to Rep. David Camp (House Ways and Means) dated 19 June 2009. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/103xx/doc10327/06-19-CapAndTradeCosts.pdf
  7. Consumer Expenditure Survey (2006) Microdata Extracts, NBER. Available http://www.nber.org/data/ces_cbo.html
  8. Cutler DM, Katz LF (1992) Rising inequality? Changes in the distribution of income and consumption in the 1980’s. Am Econ Rev 82(2)Google Scholar
  9. Dallas B, Rich S, Margaret W (2008) The incidence of US climate policy: where you stand depends on where you sit. Discussion Paper 08–28, Resources for the Future, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Don F, Metcalf GE (2002) Tax incidence handbook of public economics. In: Auerbach AJ, Feldstein M (ed) Elsvier, Amsterdam, pp 1788–1839Google Scholar
  11. Environmental Protection Agency (2009) EPA Economic Analysis of the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_111/20090623/hr2454_epasummary.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2009
  12. Fernandez-Villaverde J, Krueger D (2007) Consumption over the life cycle: facts from CEX data. Rev Econ Stat 89(3): 552–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fullerton D (2009) Distributional effects of environmental and energy policy: an introduction. In: Fullerton D (eds) Distributional effects of environmental and energy policy. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  14. Fullerton D, Heutel G (2007) The general equilibrium incidence of environmental taxes. J Public Econ 91: 571–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fullerton D, Rogers DL (1993) Who bears the lifetime tax burden?. Brookings Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  16. Goulder LH, Parry IWH, Burtraw D (1997) Revenue-raising versus other approaches to environmental protection: the critical significance of preexisting tax distortions. Rand J Econ 28: 708–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hassett KA, Aparna M, Metcalf GE (2009) The incidence of a US carbon tax: a lifetime and regional analysis. Energy J 30(2)Google Scholar
  18. Hendrickson CT, Lave LB, Matthews HS (2006) Environmental life cycle assessment of goods and services: an input-output approach. Resources for the Future Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  19. Kerkhof AC, Moll HC, Drissen E, Wilting HC (2008) Taxation of multiple greenhouse gases and the effects on income distribution: a case study of the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 67: 318–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Labandeira X, Labeaga JM (1999) Combining input-output analysis and micro-simulation to assess the effects of carbon taxation on Spanish households. Fisc Stud 20: 305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leontief W (1970) Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Rev Econ Stat 52(3): 262–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leontief W (1986) Input-output economics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynn CJ, Don F, Thomas G (2000) The Progressivity of Social Security Working Paper 7520, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  24. Metcalf GE (1999) A distributional analysis of green tax reforms. Natl Tax J 52: 665–681Google Scholar
  25. Metcalf GE (2009) A proposal for a US carbon tax swap: an equitable tax reform to address global climate change. Rev Environ Econ Policy 3: 63–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Metcalf GE, Sergey P, Reilly JM, Jacoby HD, Jennifer H (2008) Analysis of US greenhouse gas tax proposals. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Report 160Google Scholar
  27. Morgenstern RD, Ho M, Shih S-S, Zhang X (2004) The near-term impacts of carbon mitigation policies on manufacturing industries. Energy Policy 32: 1825–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paltsev S, Reilly J, Jacoby H, Gurgel A, Metcalf G, Sokolov A, Holak J (2007) Assessment of US cap-and-trade proposals. MIT CEEPR paper 07-005Google Scholar
  29. Parry IWH (2004) Are emissions permits regressive?. J Environ Econ Manag 47: 364–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parry IWH, Hilary S, Margaret W, Roberton W III (2005) The incidence of pollution control policies. RFF Discussion Paper 05-24Google Scholar
  31. Poterba JM (1989) Lifetime incidence and the distributional burden of excise taxes. Am Econ Review 79: 325–330Google Scholar
  32. Shammin MR, Bullard CW (2009) Impact of cap-and-trade policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions on U.S.Households. Ecol Econ 68: 2432–2438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. US Census Bureau (2007) Current Population Survey. Annual Social and Economic Supplement. Table HINC-06. Revised August 28, 2007. Available http://pubdb3.census.gov/macro/032007/hhinc/new06_000.htm
  34. US EPA (2007) Inventory of US greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2005. Available http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/downloads06/07ES.pdf
  35. West SE, Williams RC III (2004) Estimates from a consumer demand system: implications for the incidence of environmental taxes. J Environ Econ Manag 47: 535–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wier M, Birr-Pedersen K, Jacobsen HK, Klok J (2005) Are CO 2 taxes regressive? Evidence from the Danish experience. Ecol Econ 52: 239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and applied EconomicsUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Economics and Bren School of Environmental Science and ManagementUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  4. 4.Resources for the FutureWashingtonUSA
  5. 5.National Bureau of Economic ResearchCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations