Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 43–58 | Cite as

Modeling the Economics of Biodiversity and Environmental Heterogeneity

  • William Brock
  • Ann Kinzig
  • Charles PerringsEmail author
Article

Abstract

It has long been recognized that major drivers of biodiversity loss include both the harvest of wild species and the conversion of habitat for productive purposes. Land that is converted may or may not be lost as habitat for many species. In some cases, monoculture production for example, land conversion reduces the number niches and hence the level of biodiversity. In other cases, it has the opposite effect. We address the problem of anthropogenic biodiversity change due to the effects of both harvest rates and land use decisions on landscape heterogeneity. If the optimal structure of the landscape is extremely homogeneous, forces of competitive exclusion will lead to a single surviving species. If it is extremely heterogeneous, multiple species will coexist, with each species exclusively dominating the patch type to which it is best suited. Where changes in biodiversity due to changes in landscape heterogeneity are not taken into account in land use decisions, they are external effects of those decisions. We identify measures of these effects.

Keywords

Biodiversity Environmental heterogeneity Externality 

JEL Classification

Q21 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barbier E, Schulz C (1997) Wildlife, biodiversity and trade. Environ Dev Econ 2(2): 145–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brander JA, Taylor MS (1997) International trade and open-access renewable resources: the small open economy case. Can J Econ 30(3): 526–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brock WA, Xepapadeas A (2002) Optimal management when species compete for limited resources. J Environ Econ Manag 44(2): 189–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Conway GR (1993) Sustainable agriculture: the trade-offs with productivity, stability and equitability. In: Barbier EB (eds) Economics and ecology : new frontiers and sustainable development. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 46–65Google Scholar
  5. Crane P, Kinzig A (2005) Nature in the metropolis. Science 308(5726): 1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jackson LE, Pascual U, Hodgkin T (2007) Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121: 196–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kinzig AP, Harte J (2000) Implications of endemics-area relationships in estimates of species extinctions. Ecology 81(12): 3305–3311Google Scholar
  8. Kinzig AP, Levin SA, Dushoff J, Pacala S (1999) Limiting similarity, species packing, and system stability for hierarchical competition-colonization models. Am Nat 153(4): 371–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kinzig AP, Ryan P, Etienne M, Elmqvist T, Allison H, Walker BH (2006) Resilience and regime shifts: assessing cascading effects. Ecol Soc 11(1):article 13 (online)Google Scholar
  10. Loreau M, Mouquet N, Gonzalez A (2003) Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. PNAS 22: 12765–12770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  12. May RM, Lawton JH, Stork NE (1995) Assessing extinction rates. In: Lawton JH, May RM (eds) Extinction rates. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. McNeely JA, Scherr SJ (2003) Ecoagriculture: strategies to feed the world and save wild biodiversity. Island press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Norberg J, Swaney DP, Dushoff J, Lin J, Casagrandi R, Levin SA (2001) Phenotypic diversity and ecosystem functioning in changing environmentas: a theoretical framework. Proc Nat Acad Sci 98(20): 11376–11381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pereira HM, Daily GC (2006) Modeling biodiversity dynamics in countryside landscapes. Ecology 87: 1877–1885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Polasky S, Costello C, McAusland C (2004) On trade, land-use and biodiversity. J Environ Econ Manag 48: 911–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Polasky S, Nelson E, Lonsdorf E, Fackler P, Starfield A (2005) Conserving species in a working landscape: land use with biological and economic objectives. Ecol Appl 15: 1387–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperilled species in the United States. Bioscience 48: 607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Worm B, Barbier EB, Beaumont N, Duffy JE, Folke C, Halpern BS, Jackson JBC, Lotzke HK, Micehli F, Palumbi SR, Sala E, Selkoe KA, Stachowicz JJ, (2006) Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314: 787–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations