Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 459–479 | Cite as

Environmental Regulation and Industry Location in Europe

  • Abay Mulatu
  • Reyer Gerlagh
  • Dan Rigby
  • Ada Wossink
Open Access
Article

Abstract

This paper estimates the effect of environmental regulation on industry location and compares it with other determinants of location such as agricultural, education and R&D country characteristics. The analysis is based on a general empirical trade model that captures the interaction between country and industry characteristics in determining industry location. The Johnson–Neyman technique is used to fully explicate the nature of the conditional interactions. The model is applied to data on 16 manufacturing industries from 13 European countries. The empirical results indicate that the pollution haven effect is present and that the relative strength of such an effect is of about the same magnitude as other determinants of industry location. A significant negative effect on industry location is observed only at relatively high levels of industry pollution intensity.

Keywords

Pollution haven hypothesis Comparative advantage Industry location 

References

  1. Antweiler W, Copeland B, Taylor S (2001) Is free trade good for the environment?.  Am Econ Rev 91: 877–907Google Scholar
  2. Bauer DJ, Curran PJ (2005) Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: inferential and graphical techniques. Multivar Behav Res 40: 373–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker RA, Henderson JV (2001) Effects of air quality regulations on polluting industries. J Polit Econ 108: 379–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brambor T, Clark L, Golder M (2006) Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Polit Anal 14: 63–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chintrakarn P, Millimet DL (2006) The environmental consequences of trade: evidence from subnational trade flows. J Environ Econ Manage 52: 430–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cole MA, Elliott RJR (2003a) Determining the trade-environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. J Environ Econ Manage 46: 363–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cole MA, Elliott RJR (2003b) Do environmental regulations influence trade patterns? Testing old and new trade theories. World Econ 26: 1163–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Shimamoto K (2005) Why the grass is not always greener: the competing effects of environmental regulations and factor intensities on US specialization. Ecol Econ 54: 95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Copeland B, Taylor S (1994) North–South trade and the environment. Q J Econ 109: 755–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Copeland B, Taylor S (1995) Trade and transboundary pollution. Am Econ Rev 85: 716–737Google Scholar
  11. Copeland B, Taylor S (2003) International trade and the environment: theory and evidence. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  12. Ederington J, Levinson A, Minier J (2004) Trade liberlization and pollution havens. Adv Econ Anal Pol 4 (Article 6)Google Scholar
  13. Fullerton D (2006) The economics of pollution havens. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenstone M (2002) The impacts of environmental regulations on industrial activity: evidence from the 1970 and 1977 clean air acts and the census of manufactures. J Polit Econ 110: 1175–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huitema B (1980) The analysis of covariance and alternatives. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Jaffe AB, Peterson SR, Stavins RN (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of United States manufacturing—what does the evidence tell us?.  J Econ Lit 33: 132–163Google Scholar
  17. Javorcik B, Wei S (2004) Pollution havens and foreign direct investment: dirty secret or popular myth? Contrib Econ Anal Pol 3 (Article 8)Google Scholar
  18. Jeppesen T, List JA, Folmer H (2002) Environmental regulation and new plant location decisions: evidence from a meta-analysis. J Reg Sci 42(1): 19–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keller W, Levinson A (2002) Pollution abatement costs and direct foreign investment inflows in the United States. Rev Econ Stat 84: 691–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krugman P, Venables AJ (1995) Globalization and the inequality of nations. Q J Econ 110: 857–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leamer E (1984) Sources of international comparative advantage: theory and evidence. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Levinson A, Taylor MS (2008) Unmasking the pollution haven effect. Int Econ Rev 49: 223–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. List JA, Co CY (2000) The effects of environmental regulations on foreign direct investment. J Environ Econ Manage 40: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. List JA, McHone WW (2000) Measuring the effects of air quality regulations on “dirty” firm births: evidence from the neo- and mature-regulatory periods. Pap Reg Sci 79: 177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Low P, Yeats A (1992) Do ‘dirty’ industries migrate?. In: Low P (eds) International trade and the environment. World Bank, Washington DC, pp 89–103Google Scholar
  26. Midelfart-Knarvik KH, Overman HG, Venables AJ (2000a) Comparative advantage and economic geography: estimating the location of production in the EU. Centre for economic policy research discussion paper no. 2618Google Scholar
  27. Midelfart-Knarvik KH, Overman HG, Redding SJ, Venables AJ (2000b) The location of European industry, economic papers no. 142. European commission. D-G for economic and financial affairs, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  28. Millimet DL, List JA (2004) The case of the missing pollution haven hypothesis. J. Regul. Econ. 26: 239–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mulatu A, Florax R, Withagen C (2004) Environmental regulation and international trade: empirical results for Germany, the Netherlands and the US, 1977–1992. Contrib Econ Anal Pol 3 (Article 5)Google Scholar
  30. Pellegrini L, Gerlagh R (2006a) Corruption and environmental policies: what are the implications for the enlarged EU?.  Euro Environ 16: 139–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pellegrini L, Gerlagh R (2006b) Corruption, democracy and environmental policy: an empirical contribution to the debate. J Environ Devel 15: 332–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pratten C (1988) A survey of the economies of scale. In Commission of the European Communities: Research on the Costs of non-Europe, 2: Studies on the Economics of IntegrationGoogle Scholar
  33. Preacher K, Curran P, Bauer D (2003) Simple intercepts, simple slopes, and regions of significance in MLR 2-way interactions. Available from http://www.psych.ku.edu/preacher/interact/mlr2.htm
  34. Raspiller S, Riedinger N (2008) Do environmental regulations influence the location of french firms. Land Econ 84(3): 382–395Google Scholar
  35. Reinaud J (2004) Industrial competitiveness under the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. International Energy Agency Information PaperGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor S (2004) Unbundling the pollution haven hypothesis. Adv Econ Anal Pol 4 (Article 8)Google Scholar
  37. van Soest DP, List JA, Jeppesen T (2006) Shadow prices, environmental stringency, and international competitiveness. Eur Econ Rev 50: 1151–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Venables AJ (1996) Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries. Int Econ Rev 37: 341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wolfe R (2004) Crossing the river by feeling the stones: where the WTO is going after Seattle, Doha and Cancun. Rev Int Polit Econ 11: 574–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wooldridge J (2009) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach, 3rd edn. Thomson South-WesternGoogle Scholar
  41. Xing YO, Kolstad CD (2002) Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment?. Environ Resour Econ 21: 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abay Mulatu
    • 1
  • Reyer Gerlagh
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dan Rigby
    • 2
  • Ada Wossink
    • 2
  1. 1.Economics, LMBSLondon Metropolitan UniversityLondonUK
  2. 2.Economics, School of Social SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.Tilburg UniversityTilburgThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations