The hedonic price method was used to estimate the influence of parks on the rental prices of single-room dwellings in Setagaya Ward, Tokyo, Japan. A simple least squares method is not optimal when the data set contains spatial autocorrelation. To improve the accuracy of estimates, we employed spatial autoregression and kriging models, resulting in a higher validity of the spatial models compared to the least squares model. Kriging models were superior to others particularly in terms of prediction accuracy, indicating that these models should be employed if the objective is superior prediction rather than estimation. The results showed that the effect of parks on property values varied with the buffer distance and park size.
Hedonic approach Kriging Spatial autocorrelation Spatial regression models Urban parks
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Acharya G, Bennett LL (2001) Valuing open space and land-use patterns in urban watersheds. J Real Estate Finance Econ 22: 221–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
Anselin L, Bera AK, Florax R et al (1996) Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Reg Sci Urban Econ 26: 77–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu S, Thibodeau TG (1998) Analysis of spatial autocorrelation in house prices. J Real Estate Finance Econ 17: 61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire P, Sheppard S (1995) On the price of land and the value of amenities. Economica 62: 247–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho SH, Bowker JM, Park WM (2006) Measuring the contribution of water and green space amenities to housing values: an application and comparison of spatially weighted hedonic models. J Agri Resource Econ 31: 485–507Google Scholar