Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 245–262 | Cite as

ISO 14001 Environmental Certification: A Sign Valued by the Market?

  • Joaquín Cañón-de-Francia
  • Concepción Garcés-Ayerbe


The main purpose of this work is to analyse whether ISO 14001 certification is interpreted by the capital market as a sign of environmental responsibility, modifying long-term efficiency expectations and the profitability of firms. Under competing assumptions that ISO 14001 certification is adopted by firms either proactively or reactively, we test competing hypotheses about how this certification affects the market value of firms. The analysis is based on a sample of 80 environmental certifications of the plant systems or processes of large Spanish firms which traded on the continuous market of the Madrid Stock Exchange from 1996 to 2002. Using event study methodology, we found that ISO 14001 certification has a negative effect on the market value of certain firms. Specifically, the results obtained seem to show that the market negatively views the allocation of resources to ISO 14001 certification in the case of less polluting and less internationalised firms. On the other hand, the results obtained do not suggest clear evidence that the economic impact of ISO 14001 certification is negative for more polluting and more internationalised firms.


Environmental Management System Environmental proactiveness ISO 14001 certification Market value Resource-based view Event study methodology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arora S, Gangopadhyay S (1995) Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance. J Econ Behav Organ 28: 298–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bansal P, Bogner W (2002) Deciding on ISO 14001: economics institutions and context. Long Range Plan 35: 269–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17: 99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boiral O (2007) Corporate greening through ISO 14001: a rational myth?. Organ Sci 18: 127–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bozeman B (1987) All organizations are public. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown SJ, Warner JB (1980) Measuring security price performance. J Finan Econ 8: 205–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown SJ, Warner JB (1985) Using daily stock returns: the case of event studies. J Finan Econ 14: 3–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chin K, Pun K (1999) Factors influencing ISO 14000 implementation in printed circuit board manufacturing industry in Hong Kong. J Environ Plan Manag 42: 123–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corrado C (1989) A non parametric test for abnormal security price performance in event studies. J Finan Econ 23: 385–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christainsen GB, Haveman RH (1981) The contribution of environmental regulations to the slowdown in productivity growth. J Environ Econ Manag 8: 381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Darnall N (2006) Why firms mandate ISO 14001 certification. Bus Soc 45: 354–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darnall N, Edwards D (2006) Predicting the cost of environmental management system adoption: the role of capabilities resources and ownership structure. Strateg Manag J 27: 301–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darnall N, Ringling D, Andrews R, Amaral D (2000) Environmental management systems: opportunities for improved environmental and business strategy?. Environ Qual Manag 9: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darnall N, Henriques I, Sadorsky P (2007) Do environmental systems improve business performance in an international setting?. J Int Manag 14(4): 364–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dasgupta S, Ho Hong J, Laplante B, Mamingi N (2006) Disclosure of environmental violations and stock market in the Republic of Korea. Ecol Econ 58: 759–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Backer P (1999) L‘impact économique et l‘efficacité environnementale de la certification ISO 14001/EMAS des entreprises industrielles. ADEME, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. Delgado JM, Ramírez M, Espitia M (2004) Intangible resources as a key factor in the internationalisation of Spanish firms. J Econ Behav Organ 53: 477–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delmas M (2001) Stakeholders and competitive advantage: the case of ISO 14001. Prod Oper Manag 10: 343–358Google Scholar
  19. DiMaggio PW, Powell W (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48: 147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dowell G, Hart S, Yeung B (2000) Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value?. Manag Sci 46: 1059–1074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fama E (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Finan 25: 383–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feldman SJ, Soyka P, Ameer P (1997) Does improving a firm’s environmental management system and environmental performance result in a Higher stock price?. J Invest 6: 87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Filbeck G, Gorman RF (2004) The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environ Res Econ 29: 137–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. González F (1995) La reacción de los precios de las acciones ante anuncios de dividendos: la evidencia empírica en el mercado español de valores. Investig Econ 2: 249–268Google Scholar
  25. González V (1997) La valoración por el mercado de capitales español de la financiación bancaria y de las emisiones de obligaciones. Investig Econ 82: 111–128Google Scholar
  26. Grant R (1991) The resource based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif Manag Rev 33: 114–135Google Scholar
  27. Guenster N, Derwall J, Bauer R, Koedijk K (2006) The economic value of corporate eco-efficiency. Working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=675628
  28. Gupta S, Goldar B (2005) Do stock markets penalize environment-unfriendly behaviour?. Evidence from India. Ecol Econ 52: 81–95Google Scholar
  29. Hamilton JT (1995) Pollution as news: media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. J Environ Econ Manag 28: 98–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hart S, Ahuja G (1996) Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus Strategy Environ 5: 30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jaffe A, Peterson S, Portney P, Stavins R (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?. J Econ Lit 33: 132–163Google Scholar
  32. Khanna M, Quimio W, Bojilova D (1998) Toxic release information: a policy tool for environmental protection. J Environ Econ Manag 36: 243–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kothari SP, Warner J (2007) Econometrics of even studies. In: (eds) In: Espen Eckbo B (ed) Handbook of corporate finance. North-Holland, Elsevier, pp, pp 3–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. King A, Lenox M (2001) Does it really pay to be green?. An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. J Ind Ecol 5: 105–116Google Scholar
  35. King A, Lenox M (2002) Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Manag Sci 48: 289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klassen T, Mclaughlin C (1996) The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Manag Sci 42: 1199–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klassen R, Whybark D (1999) The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Acad Manag J 42: 599–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Konar S, Cohen MA (1997) Information as regulation: the effect of community right to know laws on toxic emissions. J Environ Econ Manag 32: 109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Konar S, Cohen MA (2001) Does the market value environmental performance. Rev Econ Stat 83: 281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Link S, Naveh E (2006) Standardization and discretion: does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits?. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 53: 508–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mckinlay A (1997) Event studies in economics and finance. J Econ Lit 35: 13–39Google Scholar
  42. McWilliams A, Siegel D (1997) Event studies in management research: theoretical and empirical issues. Acad Manag J 40: 626–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Melnyk S, Sroufe R, Calantone R (2002) Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. J Oper Manag 336: 1–23Google Scholar
  44. Montabon F, Melnyk S, Sroufe R, Calantone R (2000) ISO 14000: assessing its perceived impact on corporate purchasing performance. J Supply Chain Manag 36: 4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nehrt C (1996) Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strateg Manag J 17: 535–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Noci G, Verganti R (1999) Managing green product innovation and small firms. R&D Manag 29: 3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Patell J (1976) Corporate forecast of earnings per share and stock price behavior: empirical tests. J Account Res autumn 246–274Google Scholar
  48. Porter M (1991) America’s green strategy. Sci Am 264: 168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Porter M, Van der Linde C (1995) Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harv Bus Rev 73: 120–134Google Scholar
  50. Potoski M, Prakash A (2005) with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities’ environmental performance. J Policy Anal Manag 24: 745–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Radonjic G, Tominc P (2006) The impact and significance of ISO 14001 certification on the adoption of new technologies; the case of Slovenia. Manag Environ Qual 17: 707–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rondinelli D, Vastag G (2000) Panacea, common sense, or just a label? The value of ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems. Eur Manag J 18: 499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ruiz FJ, Espitia M (1996) La formación de precios de las acciones alrededor del pago de dividendos en el Mercado de capitales español. R Esp de Fin y contab 25: 179–198Google Scholar
  54. Rumelt R (1984) Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In: Lamb RB (eds) Competitive strategic management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 556–570Google Scholar
  55. Russo M, Fouts P (1997) A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad Manag J 40: 534–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Russo M, Harrison N (2001) An empirical study of the impact of ISO 14001 registration on emissions performance, Paper presented at the Ninth greening of industry network annual conference, Bangkok, Thailand. http://lcb1.uoregon.edu/mrusso/Text-GINa.htm
  57. Sarkis J, Kitazawa S (2000) The relationship between ISO14001 and continuous source reduction programs. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20: 225–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Scott WR (1992) Organizations: rational natural and open systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  59. Sharma S, Vredenburg H (1998) Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg Manag J 19: 729–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sharpe W (1964) Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Finan 19(3): 425–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Telle K (2006) It pays to be green—a premature conclusion?. Environ Resour Econ 35: 195–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Toms JS (2002) Firms resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: some UK evidence. Br Account Rev 34: 257–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wagner M, Schaltegger S, Wehrmeyer W (2001) The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: what does theory propose and what does empirical evidence tell us?. Greener Manag Int 34: 95–108Google Scholar
  64. Xepapadeas A, Zeeuw A (1999) Environmental policy and competitiveness: the porter hypothesis and the composition of capital. J Environ Econ Manag 37: 165–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ziegler A, Schröder M, Rennings K (2007) The effect of environmental and social performance on the stock performance of European corporations. Environ Resour Econ 37: 661–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joaquín Cañón-de-Francia
    • 1
  • Concepción Garcés-Ayerbe
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Economía y Dirección de EmpresasUniversity of Zaragoza (Spain)ZaragozaSpain

Personalised recommendations