Value of a Statistical Life—the Case of Poland
- First Online:
- 134 Downloads
This study investigates the relationship between wages and the risk of work-related death for male blue-collar workers. The size of the premium for risk and its statistical significance depend heavily on the inclusion of industry dummy variables into the regression. Irrespective of the type of risk variable used, controlling for industry at a finer breakdown lowers the price of risk and its statistical significance. Estimates of the value of a statistical life (VSL) proved to be more robust when an aggregated risk measure at three-digit occupational level was used. In this case, the VSL varied from 0.79 million USD (for the model with industry dummy variables at the three-digit level) to 2.41 million USD (for the model without industry dummy variables). To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study estimating VSL using the compensating wage differential approach for countries in Central-Eastern Europe.
KeywordsCompensating wage differential Job risks Value of statistical life
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Black D, Galdo J, Liu L (2003) How robust are hedonic wage estimates of the price of risk? Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
- Dickens WT (1984) Differences between risk premiums in union and nonunion wages and the case for occupational safety regulation. Am Econ Rev 74(2): 320–323Google Scholar
- Leigh JP, Folsom RN (1984) Estimates of the value of accident avoidance at the job depend on the concavity of the equalizing differences curve. Q Rev Econ Bus 24(1): 56–66Google Scholar
- Riboud M, Sanchez-Paramo C, Silva-Jauregui C (2002) Does eurosclerosis matter? Institutional reform and labor market performance in central and eastern European countries in the 1990s. World Bank working paper no. 591Google Scholar
- Thaler R, Rosen S (1975) The value of saving a life: evidence from the labor market. In: Terleckyj NE(eds) Household production and consumption. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 265–300Google Scholar