Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 91–112 | Cite as

Spatial distribution of species populations, relative economic values, and the optimal size and number of reserves



We examine the tradeoff between the number and average size of nature reserves. When the costs of enforcing reserve boundaries are negligible, we find analytically that the relative price of biodiversity has a positive impact on the optimal total reserved area but an ambiguous impact on the optimal number of reserves. Simulation modeling of floral diversity in a tropical timber concession reveals that the resolution of this ambiguity depends on spatial distributions of the populations of tree species: whether or not they are spatially aggregated (clumped). The impact of biodiversity price on optimal reserve number remains analytically ambiguous when enforcement costs are not negligible. Multiple reserves being economically superior to a single reserve now requires, in addition to aggregation, a biodiversity price that is sufficiently high to offset the effects of enforcement costs. Most of our simulation scenarios generate threshold biodiversity prices that do not exceed a leading estimate of the marginal value of a higher plant species in the bioprospecting literature. Several smaller reserves evidently can be economically superior to a single larger one even in the presence of enforcement costs.


Biodiversity Conservation Nature reserve Spatial aggregation Rainforest 

JEL codes

Q57 Q23 C15 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ando A, Camm J, Polasky S, Solow A (1998) Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279:2126–2128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balmford A, Gaston KJ, Rodrigues ASL (2000) Integrating costs of conservation into international priority setting. Conserv Biol 14:597–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boscolo M, Vincent JR (2003) Nonconvexities in the production of timber, biodiversity, and carbon sequestration. J Environ Econ Manage 46(2):251–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowes MD,Krutilla JV (1989) Multiple use management: The economics of public forestlands. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE, da Fonseca GAB (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291:125–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calkin DE, Montgomery CA, Schumaker NH, Polasky S, Arthur JL, Nalle DJ (2002) Developing a production possibility set of wildlife species persistence and timber harvest value. Can J For Res 32:1329–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambers RG (1988) Applied production analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiang AC (1984). Fundamental methods of mathematical economics, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman DB (1981) On random placement and species-area relations. Math Biosci 54:191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Condit R, Ashton PS, Baker P, Bunyavejchewin S, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, Hubbell SP, Foster RB, Itoh A, Lafrankie JV, Lee HS, Losos E, Manokaran N, Sukumar R, Yamakura T (2000) Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science 288:1414–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Condit R, Hubbell SP, LaFrankie JV, Sukumar R, Manokaran N, Foster RB, Ashton PS (1996) Species-area and species-individual relationships for tropical trees: a comparison of three 50 ha plots. J Ecol 84:549–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Condit R, Pitman N, Leigh EG, Chave J, Terborgh J, Foster RB, Nunez P, Aguilar S, Valencia R, Villa G, Muller-Landau HC, Losos E, Hubbell SP (2002) Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295:666–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diamond JM (1976) Island biogeography and conservation: strategy and limitation. Science 193:1027–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dick CW, Etchelecu G, Austerlitz F (2003) Pollen dispersal of tropical trees (Dinizia excelsa; Fabaceae) by native insects and African honeybees in pristine and fragmented Amazonian rainforest. Mol Ecol 12:753–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forest Stewardship Council (2002) FSC principles and criteria, www.fscoax.org/principal.htm (accessed June 27, 2003)Google Scholar
  16. Franklin IR (1980). Evolutionary changes in small populations. In: Soulé ME, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology: An evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  17. Gough B (ed) (2003). GNU scientific library reference manual, 2nd edn. Network Theory Ltd, Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Haight RG, ReVelle CS, Snyder SA (2000) An integer optimization approach to a probabilistic reserve site selection problem. Oper Res 48:697–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. He FL, Gaston KJ (2000) Estimating species abundance from occurrence. Am Nat 156:553–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. He FL, Legendre P (2002) Species diversity patterns derived from species-area models. Ecology 83:1185–1198Google Scholar
  21. He FL, Legendre P, LaFrankie JV (1997) Distribution patterns of tree species in a Malaysian tropical rain forest. J Veg Sci 8:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hof J, Raphael MG (1997) Optimization of habitat placement: a case study of the northern spotted owl in the Olympic Peninsula. Ecol Appl 7:1160–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  24. Hyde WF (1989) Marginal costs of managing endangered species: the case of the red-cockaded woodpecker. J Agric Econ Res 41:12–19Google Scholar
  25. International Tropical Timber Organization (1999) Manual for the application of criteria and indicators for sustainable management of natural tropical forests. Part B: Forest management unit indicators. www.itto.or.jp/policy/pds10/contents.html (accessed June 27, 2003)Google Scholar
  26. James N, Green MJB, Paine JR (1999) A global review of protected areas budgets and staff. WCMC Biodiversity Series No. 10, World Conservation PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson NL, Kotz S (1969) Discrete distributions. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  28. Juutinen A, Mäntymaa E, Mönkkönen M, Salmi J (2004) A cost-efficient approach to selecting forest stands for conserving species: a case study from Northern Fennoscandia. For Sci 50:527–539Google Scholar
  29. Kingsland SE (2002) Creating a science of nature reserve design: perspectives from history. Environ Model Assess 7:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laurance WF, Delamônica P, Laurance SG, Vasconcelos HL, Lovejoy TE (2000) Rainforest fragmentation kills big trees. Nature 404:836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laurance WF, Lovejoy TE, Vasconcelos HL, Bruna EM, Didham RK, Stouffer PC, Gascon C, Bierregaard RO, Laurance SG, Sampaio E (2002) Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conserv Biol 16(3):605–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leigh EG, Wright SJ, Herre EA (1993) The decline of tree diversity on newly isolated tropical islands: a test of a null hypothesis and some implications. Evol Ecol 7:76–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lichtenstein ME, Montgomery CA (2003) Biodiversity and timber in the Coast Range of Oregon: inside the production possibility frontier. Land Econ 79:56–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McDonnell MD, Possingham HP, Ball IR, Cousins EA (2002) Mathematical models for spatially cohesive reserve design. Environ Model Assess 7:107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Margules CR, Higgs AJ, Rafe RW (1982) Modern biogeographic theory: are there any lessons for nature reserve design?. Biol Conserv 24:115–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. May RM (1975). Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  37. Montgomery CA, Brown GM, Adams DM (1994) The marginal cost of species preservation: the northern spotted owl. J Environ Econ Manage 26:111–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Montgomery CA, Pollak RA, Freemark K, White D (1999) Pricing biodiversity. J Environ Econ Manage 38:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nalle DJ, Montgomery CA, Arthur JL, Polasky S, Schumaker NH (2004) Modeling joint production of wildlife and timber. J Environ Econ Manage 48:997–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nason JD, Allen Herre E, Hamrick JL (1998) The breeding structure of a tropical keystone plant resource. Nature 391:685–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Plotkin JB, Chave JM, Ashton PS (2002) Cluster analysis of spatial patterns in Malaysian tree species. Am Nat 160:629–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Plotkin JB, Muller-Landau HC (2002) Sampling the species composition of a landscape. Ecology 83:3344–3356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Plotkin JB, Potts MD, Leslie N, Manokaran N, LaFrankie JV, Ashton PS (2000a) Species-area curves, spatial aggregation, and habitat specialization in tropical forests. J Theoret Biol 207:81–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Plotkin JB, Potts MD, Yu DW, Bunyavejchewin S, Condit R, Foster R, Hubbell S, LaFrankie JV, Manokaran N, Lee HS, Sukumar R, Nowak MA, Ashton PS (2000b) Predicting species diversity in tropical forests. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97:10850–10854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Polasky S, Camm JD, Solow AR, Csuti B, White D, Ding R (2000) Choosing reserve networks with incomplete species information. Biol Conserv 94:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Polasky S, Camm JD, Garber-Yonts B (2001a) Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon. Land Econ 77:68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Polasky S, Csuti B, Vossler CA, Meyers SM (2001b) A comparison of taxonomic distinctness versus richness as criteria for setting conservation priorities for North American birds. Biol Conserv 97:99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Polasky S, Solow A (1999). Conserving biological diversity with scarce resources. In: Klopatek J, Gardner R (eds) Landscape ecological analysis: issues and applications. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Rausser GC, Small AA (2000) Valuing research leads: bioprospecting and the conservation of genetic resources. J Political Econ 108:173–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rohweder MR, McKetta CW, Riggs RA (2000) Economic and biological compatibility of timber and wildlife production: an illustrative use of production possibilities frontier. Wildlife Soc Bull 28:435–447Google Scholar
  51. Sah R, Zhao J (1998) Some envelope theorems for integer and discrete choice variables. Int Economic Rev 39:623–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simberloff D, Abele LG (1976) Island biogeography theory and conservation practice. Science 191:285–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Simpson RD, Sedjo RA, Reid JW (1996) Valuing biodiversity for use in pharmaceutical research. J Polit Econ 104:163–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Soulé ME (1980) Thresholds for survival: maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. In: Soulé ME, Wilcox BA (eds) Conservation biology: An evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  55. Soulé ME, Simberloff D (1986) What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves?. Biol Conser 35:19–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swallow SK, Parks PJ, Wear DN (1990) Policy-relevant nonconvexities in the production of multiple forest benefits. J Environ Econ Manage 19:264–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Taylor LR, Woiwod IP, Perry JN (1978) The density-dependence of spatial behaviour and the rarity of randomness. J Anim Ecol 47(2):383–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Terborgh J (1975) Faunal equilibria and the design of wildlife preserves. In: Golley FB, Medina E (eds) Tropical ecological systems: Trends in terrestrial and aquatic research. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Terborgh J (1976) Island biogeography and conservation: strategy and limitation. Science 193:1029–1030Google Scholar
  60. Thomas CD (1990) What do real population dynamics tell us about minimum viable population sizes?. Conserv Biol 4(3):324–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilcove DS, McMillan M, Winston KC (1993) What exactly is an endangered species? An analysis of the endangered species list, 1985–1991. Conserv Biol 7:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wright DH (1991) Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance. J Biogeogr 18:463–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology & Center for Ecosystem Science and PolicyUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific StudiesUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations