Does “No” mean “No”? A protest methodology
- 284 Downloads
In this paper, we propose a method of identifying and truncating protesters in Contingent Valuation surveys. We propose using a system of Willingness to Pay (WTP) questions that value multiple goods and that use both discrete choice and open-ended questions coupled with multiple questions about protest beliefs administered to the entire sample. Protesters can then be identified because they reject all bids, declare zero on all open-ended questions, and hold protest beliefs. The proposed procedure has been empirically tested on an air pollution data set from Poland, where 27 of the sample was identified as protesters. The adjustment for protesters increased the estimated WTP values by a factor of more than 3.
KeywordsAir quality Contingent Valuation Embedding Protest voters Sequencing
Contingent valuation methods
Willingness to pay
We would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of Tomasz Zylicz, Bengt Kristrom, Alan Randall, Michale Hanemann, J. Preston Parry, and Olvar Bergland. We also thank Heinz Family Foundation, Institute for the Study of World Politics and Henry Hart Rice Research Fellowship for funding this project, although all views are the authors’ alone.
- Arrow K et al (2002) Appendix I: report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. In: Cost-benefit analysis, 297–323, Elgar reference collection. International library of critical writings in economics, vol 152. Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, Mass., distributed by American International Distribution Corporation, Williston, VtGoogle Scholar
- Carson, RT, Groves T, Machina MJ (2000) Incentive and information properties of preference questions. Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, California (www.econ.ucsd.edu/%Ercarson/cgm,pdf)Google Scholar
- Council of the European Union (1999) Council Directive 1999/13/EC of 11 March 1999 on the limitation of emissions of volatile organic compounds due to the use of organic solvents in certain activities and installations. Official Journal 29:0001–0022Google Scholar
- Halstead JM, Luloff AE, ThomasStevens H (1992) Protest bidders in contingent valuation. Northeastern J Agric Resour Econ 21(2):160–169Google Scholar
- Hanemann WM, Kanninen B (1996) The statistical analysis of discrete-response. CV Data, Working paperGoogle Scholar
- Jorgensen BS, Syme GJ (1995) Market models, protest bids, and outliers in contingent valuation. J Water Resour: Plan Manage 121(5):400–402Google Scholar
- Zylicz T, Bateman I, Georgiou S, Markowska A, Dziegielewska D, Turner RK, Graham A, Langford I (1995) The Baltic drainage basin project: contingent valuation of eutrophication damage in the Baltic Sea region. CSERGE, Working PaperGoogle Scholar
- Zylicz, T (2000) Costing nature in a transition economy: case studies in Poland. Northampton Mass Edward Elgar Pub, Cheltenham UKGoogle Scholar