Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 681–695 | Cite as

A portfolio approach to climate investments: CAPM and endogenous risk

Original Paper


Is there a role for investments in climate change mitigation despite low expected return? We use a model of intertemporal expected utility maximisation to analyse this question. Similar to the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) the rate of return depends on the correlation of risk between the return on investments in climate change mitigation and the market portfolio, but in contrast to the classical CAPM we admit the fact that economic and environmental systems are jointly determined, implying that environmental risk is endogenous. Therefore, investments in climate change mitigation may reduce risk via self-protection and self-insurance. If risk reduction is accounted for in cost–benefit evaluations, climate investments may be justified despite low expected return. These aspects of climate investments are not, however, communicated via standard cost–benefit analyses of climate policy. Optimal climate policy may therefore be more ambitious than previously considered.


CAPM climate change endogenous risk climate investment risk management 

JEL Classification

D81 G12 Q28 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors wish to thank Therése Hindman Persson and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. Financial support from the RAMBU program of the Norwegian Research Council is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Barbier ED, Shogren JF (2004) Growth with endogenous risk of biological invasion. Econ Inq 42(4):587–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breeden DT (1979) An intertemporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities. J Financ Econ 7:265–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cline WT (1991) Scientific basis for the greenhouse effect. Econ J 101(407):904–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cline WT (2004) Meeting the challenge of global warming. Paper presented for the Copenhagen Consensus program of the National Environmental Assessment Institute, Denmark. http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Default.asp?ID=165Google Scholar
  5. Crocker T, Shogren JF (2003) Choosing environmental risk. In: Folmer H, Tietenberg T (eds) International yearbook on environmental and resource economics 2003/2004. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehrlich I, Becker GS (1972) Market insurance, self-insurance and self-protection. J Polit Econ 80:623–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisher AC, Narain U (2003) Global warming, endogenous risk and irreversibility. Environ Res Econ 25(4):395–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gollier C (2001) The economics of risk and time. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Howarth RB (2003) Discounting and uncertainty in climate change policy analysis. Land Econ 79(3):369–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howarth RB, Norgaard RB (1993) Intergenerational transfers and the social discount rate. Environ Res Econ 3:337–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ibbotson Associates (2001) Stocks, bonds, bills and inflation. Ibbotson Associates, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Kane S, Shogren JF (2000) Linking adaptation and mitigation in climate change policy. Clim Change 45:75–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lettau M, Ludvigson S (2001) Resurrecting the (C)CAPM: a cross-sectional test when risk premia are time-varying. J Polit Econ 109(6):1238–1287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marshall JM (1976) Moral hazard. Am Econ Rev 66(5):880–890Google Scholar
  15. Lind R (1982) A primer on the major issues relating to the discount rate for evaluating national energy options. In: Lind R, Arrow K, Corey GR (eds) Discounting for time and risk in energy policy. John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  16. Lintner J (1965) The valuation of risky assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev Econ Stat 47:13–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mehra R, Prescott EC (1985) The equity premium: a puzzle. J Monet Econ 15:145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mossin J (1996) Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica 35:768–783Google Scholar
  19. Nordhaus WD (1994) Managing the global commons: the economics of climate change. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Nordhaus WD, Boyer J (2000) Warming the world: economic models of global warming. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Rubinstein M (1976) The valuation of uncertain income streams and the pricing of options. Bell J␣Econ 7:407–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sandmo A (2000) The public economics of the environment. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J␣Finance 19:425–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shogren JF, Crocker TD (1991) Risk, self-protection, and ex ante economic value. J Environ Econ Manage 20:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shogren JF, Crocker TD (1999) Risk and its consequences. J Environ Econ Manage 37:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stein C (1973) Estimation of the mean of a multivariate normal distribution. In: Proceedings of the Prague Symposium on Asymptotic Statistics, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  27. Weitzman M (1998) Why the far distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. J␣Environ Econ Manage 36:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Weitzman M (2001) Gamma discounting. Am Econ Rev 91:260–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molde Research InstituteMoldeNorway
  2. 2.ECON AnalysisOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations