Advertisement

Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 489–519 | Cite as

Economic Incentives and Residential Waste Management in Taiwan: An Empirical Investigation

  • Hai-Lan Yang
  • Robert InnesEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper presents an empirical study of how three waste management policies have affected residential waste generation and recycling behavior in Taiwan over the past decade. The three policies are unit-pricing of garbage in Taipei, a mandatory recycling program in Kaohsiung, and a nationwide policy of charging for plastic bags. We estimate policy effects on total waste, total recycling, and recycling of four specific materials, all measured by weight per capita. Unlike prior work, we find that unit-pricing and mandatory recycling policies lead to significant increases in recycling of most materials, as well as increased levels of total recycling and garbage reduction. The “plastic bag” policy is generally found to lower material-specific and total recycling rates, as well as total garbage volumes.

Key words

recycling solid waste management unit pricing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors owe thanks to Justin Tobias, Satheesh Aradhyula, Gary Thompson, and an anonymous reviewer for many penetrating comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

References

  1. Callan S. J., Thomas J.M. (1997) The Impact of State and Local Policies on the Recycling Effort. Eastern Economic Journal 23:411–423Google Scholar
  2. Choe C., Fraser I. (1999) An Economic Analysis on Household Waste Management. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 38:234–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Doe, J. (2004), ‘A Bag Habit We Need to Break’, Planet Ark Google Scholar
  4. Fullerton D., Kinnaman T. C. (1995) Garbage, Recycling and Illicit Dumping. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 29:78–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fullerton D., Kinnaman T.C. (1996) Household Responses to Pricing Garbage by the Bag. American Economic Review 86:971–983Google Scholar
  6. Fullerton D., Wu W. (1998) Policies for Green Design. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 36:131–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Herel, S. (2004), ‘Paper or Plastic? Pay Up’, San Francisco Chronicle, Nov. 20Google Scholar
  8. Hong S., Adams R. M., Love H. A. (1992) An Economic Analysis of Household Recycling of Solid Waste: The Case Study of Portland, Oregon. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 25:136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hong S. (1999) The Effects of Unit Pricing System Upon Household Solid Waste Management: The Korean Experience. Journal of Environmental Management 57:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hong S., Adams R. (1999) Household Responses to Price Incentives for Recycling: Some Further Evidence. Land Economics 75:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jenkins R. R., Martinez S. A., Palmer K., Podolsky M. J. (2003) The Determinants of Household Recycling: A Material-Specific Analysis of Recycling Program Features and Unit Pricing. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 45:294–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kinnaman T. C., Fullerton D. (2000) Garbage and Recycling with Endogenous Local Policy. Journal of Urban Economics 48:419–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Miranda M. L., Aldy J. E. (1998) Unit Pricing of Residential Municipal Solid Waste: Lessons from Nine Case Study Communities. Journal of Environmental Management 52:79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miranda M. L., Everett J. W., Blume D., Roy B. A. (1994) Market-Based Incentives and Residential Municipal Solid Waste. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13:681–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nestor V, Podolsky M. J. (1998) Assessing Incentive-Based Environmental Policies for Reducing Household Waste Disposal. Contemporary Economic Policy 16:401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reschovsky J. D., Stone S. E. (1994) Market Incentives to Encourage Household Waste Recycling: Paying for What You Throw Away. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13:120–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Saltzman, C., V. G. Duggal and M. L. Williams (1993), ‘Income and the Recycling Effort: A Maximization Problem’, Energy Economics, 33–38Google Scholar
  18. Sterner T., Bartelings H. (1999) Household Waste Management in a Swedish Municipality: Determinants of Waste Disposal, Recycling and Composting. Environmental and Resource Economics 13:473–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Strathman J. G., Rufolo A. M., Mildner G. C. (1995) The Demand for Solid Waste Disposal. Land Economics 71:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Houtven G. L., Morris G. E. (1999) Household Behavior Under Alternative Pay-As-You-Throw Systems for Solid Waste Disposal. Land Economics 75:515–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, 260 Heady HallIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations