Environmental & Resource Economics

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 385–406 | Cite as

An Empirical Bayes Approach to Combining and Comparing Estimates of the Value of a Statistical Life for Environmental Policy Analysis

Article

Abstract

An empirical Bayes pooling method is used to combine and compare estimates of the value of a statistical life (VSL). The data come from 40 selected studies published between 1974 and 2002, containing 197 VSL estimates. The estimated composite distribution of empirical Bayes adjusted VSL has a mean of $5.4 million and a standard deviation of $2.4 million. The empirical Bayes method greatly reduces the variability around the pooled VSL estimate. The pooled VSL estimate is influenced by the choice of valuation method, study location, and union status of sample but not to the source of data on occupational risk or the consideration of non-fatal risk injury.

Keywords

value of a statistical life (VSL) empirical Bayes estimate environmental policy health policy contingent valuation method hedonic wage method 

JEL Classification

J17 C11 Q28 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, G. F. and P. S. Hussey (2000), Multinational Comparison of Health Systems Data 2050. The Commonwealth Fund, International Health Policy Report (October 2000)Google Scholar
  2. Arabsheibani R. G. and Marin A.(2000), ‘Stability of Estimates of the Compensation for Damage’. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20(3), 247–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, Dan A. (2000), ‘Some Problems in the Identification of the Price of Risk’, Paper presented at USEPA Workshop, Economic Valuation of Mortality Risk Reduction: Assessing the State of the Art for Policy Applications, Silver Spring, Maryland, November 6–7, 2001Google Scholar
  4. Carson R. T., N. E. Flores and N. F. Meade (2001), Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 19(2): 173–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carson R. T. (1996). Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods. Land Economics 72(1): 80–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cummings R. G. and L. O. Taylor (1995). Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: a Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation Method. American Economic Review 83(3): 649–665Google Scholar
  7. DerSimonian R. and N. Laird (1986). Meta-analysis in Clinical Trials, Controlled Clinical Trials 7(3): 177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickens W. T. (1984). Differences between Risk Premiums in Union and Nonunion Wages and the Case for Occupational Safety Regulation. American Economic Review 74(2): 320–323Google Scholar
  9. Eom Y. S. (1994). Pesticide Residue Risk and Food Safety Valuation: A Random Utility Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 Nov: 760–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher A., L. G. Chestnut and D. M. Violette (1989). The Value of Reducing Risks of Death: A Note on New Evidence. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8(1): 88–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garen J. (1988). Compensating Wage Differentials and the Endogeneity of Job Riskiness. Review of Economics and Statistics 70(1): 9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodman, L. A. (1960), ‘On the Exact Variance of Products’, American Statistical Association Journal, December, 708–713Google Scholar
  13. Gunderson M. and D. Hyatt (2001).Workplace risks and wages: Canadian Evidence from Alternative Models. Canadian Journal of Economics 34(2): 377–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammitt J. K. and J. D. Graham (1999). Willingness to Pay for Health Protection: Inadequate Sensitivity to Probability?. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8(1): 33–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hwang, H.-S., W. R. Reed, C. Hubbard (1992). Compensating Wage Differentials and Unobserved Productivity. Journal of Political Economy 100(4): 835–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kneisner, T. J. and J. D. Leeth (1991).Compensating Wage Differentials for Fatal Injury Risk in Australia, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 4(1): 75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krupnick A., A. Alberini, M. Cropper, N. Simon, B. O’ Brien, R. Goeree and M. Heintzelman(2002). Age, Health, and the Willingness to Pay for Mortality Risk Reductions: A Contingent Valuation Survey of Ontario Residents. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 24(2): 161–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lanoie P., C. Pedro and R. Latour(1995). The Value of a Statistical Life: A Comparison of Two Approaches. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 10(3): 235–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leigh P. J. and R. N. Folsom (1984). Estimates of the Value of Accident Avoidance at the Job Depend on Concavity of the Equalizing Differences Curve. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 24(1): 55–56Google Scholar
  20. Levy J. I., J. K. Hammitt and J. D. Spengler (2000). Estimating the Mortality Impacts of Particulate Matter: What Can Be Learned from Between-Study Variability?. Environmental Health Perspectives 108(2): 108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loomis J. B. and P. H. du Vair (1993). Evaluating the Effect of Alternative Risk Communication Devices on Willingness to Pay: Results from a Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Experience. Land Economics 69(3): 87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manly, B. F. J. (1997). Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd edition. London, Chapman & HallGoogle Scholar
  23. Marin A. and G. Psacharopoulos (1982). The Reward for Risk in the Labor Market: Evidence from the United Kingdom and Reconciliation with Other Studies. Journal of Political Economy 90(4): 827–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martinello F. and Ronald M. (1992). Workplace Risks and the Value of Hazard Avoidance. Canadian Journal of Economics 25(2): 333–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller T. R.(2000). Variations between Countries in Values of Statistical Life. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 34(2):169–188Google Scholar
  26. Miller P., C. Mulvey and K. Norris (1997). Compensating Differentials for Risk of Death in Australia. Economic Record 73(223): 363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore M. J. and W. Kip Viscusi (1988). Doubling the Estimated Value of Life: Results Using New Occupational Fatality Data. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 7(3): 476–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mrozek J. R. and L. O. Taylor (2002). What Determines the Value of Life? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22(1): 253–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Post E., Hoaglin D., Deck L. and Larntz K.(2001). An Empirical Bayes Approach to Estimating the Relation of Mortality to Exposure to Particulate Matter. Risk Analysis 21(5): 837–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sandy R. and R. F. Elliott (1996). Unions and Risks: their Impact on the Level of Compensation for Fatal Risk. Economica 63 May: 291–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scotton, Carol R. and Laura O. Taylor (2000), ‘New Evidence from the Labor Markets on the Value of a Statistical Life’, Working Paper, Atlanta: Department of Economics, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  32. Siebert S. W. and Wei X.(1994).Compensating Wage Differentials at Workplace Accidents: Evidence for Union and Nonunion Workers in the UK. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 9(1): 61–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Silverman B. W.(1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London, Chapman & HallGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, R. S. (1976). The Occupational safety and Health Act: Its Goals and Achievements. Washington, American Enterprise InstituteGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith V. K. and C. C. S. Gilbert (1984). The Implicit Risks to Life: A Comparative Analysis. Economic Letters 16(3–4):393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1999). The Benefits and Cost of the Clean Air Act, 1990 to 2010. Washington, USEPAGoogle Scholar
  37. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2005). Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Clean Air Intersale Rule. Washington, USEPAGoogle Scholar
  38. Viscusi K. W. (1978). Labor Market. Valuations of Life and Limb: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications. Public Policy 26(3):359–386Google Scholar
  39. Viscusi W. K. (1992). Fatal Tradeoffs: Public and Private Responsibilities for Risk. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Viscusi W. K. and J. E. Aldy (2003). The Value of Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates throughout the World,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27(1): 5–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Viscusi W. K. and W. N. Evans (1990). Utility Functions that Depend on Health Status: Estimates and Economic Implications. American Economic Review 80(3): 353–374Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyResearch Triangle ParkUSA
  3. 3.Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth SciencesDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations