Environmental and Resource Economics

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 1–12

Anomalies and Stated Preference Techniques: A Framework for a Discussion of Coping Strategies



This paper introduces a symposium on the issue of how stated preference (SP) research can best cope with ‘anomalies’ (i.e. systematic deviations from the predictions of standard economic theory) in survey responses. It proposes a framework for constructive debate, recognising (i) the legitimate aspirations of SP research, (ii) the relevance of evidence from sources other than best-practice SP, and (iii) the precautionary value of investigating strategies for coping with suspected anomalies, even if questions about the robustness of anomalies have not been finally resolved. Five alternative coping strategies, discussed in more detail in the symposium, are briefly introduced.


stated preference contingent valuation anomalies 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bateman, I.,  et al. 2002Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A ManualDepartment for Transport and Edward ElgarCheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  2. Camerer, C. 1995

    Individual Decision Making

    John, K.Alvin, R. eds. Handbook of Experimental EconomicsPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJ
    Google Scholar
  3. Hanemann, M. 1991‘Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?’American Economic Review81635647Google Scholar
  4. Kahneman, D.Tversky, A. eds. 2000Choices, Values, and FramesRussell Sage Foundation and Cambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. List, J.A. 2005‘Scientific Numerology, Preference Anomalies, and Environmental Policymaking’Environmental & Resource Economics323553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sugden, R. 1999

    Alternatives to the Neoclassical Theory of Choice

    Bateman, I.Willis, K. eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EC and Developing CountriesOxford University PressOxford
    Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsUniversity of East AngliaUK

Personalised recommendations