Anomalies and Stated Preference Techniques: A Framework for a Discussion of Coping Strategies
- 246 Downloads
This paper introduces a symposium on the issue of how stated preference (SP) research can best cope with ‘anomalies’ (i.e. systematic deviations from the predictions of standard economic theory) in survey responses. It proposes a framework for constructive debate, recognising (i) the legitimate aspirations of SP research, (ii) the relevance of evidence from sources other than best-practice SP, and (iii) the precautionary value of investigating strategies for coping with suspected anomalies, even if questions about the robustness of anomalies have not been finally resolved. Five alternative coping strategies, discussed in more detail in the symposium, are briefly introduced.
Keywordsstated preference contingent valuation anomalies
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bateman, I., et al. 2002Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A ManualDepartment for Transport and Edward ElgarCheltenhamGoogle Scholar
- Camerer, C. 1995
Individual Decision MakingJohn, K.Alvin, R. eds. Handbook of Experimental EconomicsPrinceton University PressPrinceton, NJGoogle Scholar
- Hanemann, M. 1991‘Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?’American Economic Review81635647Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D.Tversky, A. eds. 2000Choices, Values, and FramesRussell Sage Foundation and Cambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Sugden, R. 1999
Alternatives to the Neoclassical Theory of ChoiceBateman, I.Willis, K. eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EC and Developing CountriesOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar